Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:20:19.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXXVIII.—On the Morphological Relationships of the Molluscoida and Cœlenterata, and of their leading Members, inter se

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

John Denis MacDonald
Affiliation:
Surgeon of H.M S. “Icarus.”

Extract

Few departments of zoology have recently suffered more remarkable changes, both in classification and accepted views of structure, than the Polypi or Cœlenterata, and their immediate allies in the ascending scale, the Molluseoida,—greatly depending upon the more extended study of those animals of late years. We have been thus enabled to discover natural affinities which prima facie evidence would scarcely ever have indicated, as well as intrinsic differences which the same kind of evidence has hitherto been incapable of revealing to the mind.

Leading from the Protozoa to the Mollusca proper, the Cœlenterata and Molluscoida constitute an unbroken series of animals forming a considerable section of invertebrata, distinguished from the Protozoa by the development of true ova, and from the Mollusca by the property of gemmation developing compound examples of the principal types. Furthermore, the motion of the blood, or its equivalent, is effected either by ciliary action or by a propulsive organ; but when the latter occurs it is unfurnished with valves, so that the course of the circulation may be reversible in the same canals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1864

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 516 note * It will be seen, in the course of this paper, that I have availed myself of the useful terms employed by Professor Huxley, more particularly with reference to the Cœlenterata.

page 516 note † See Professor Allman's remarks on this subject, in his valuable work on the fresh-water Polyzoa. Published by the Ray Society.

page 517 note * This family name is objectionable, as having been chosen from a supposititious genus founded upon a mutilated specimen of Cydippe, indifferently drawn.

page 517 note † Would it be too far-fetched to suppose that these sinuses are, as it were, retrospective of the tentacula of Actinia?

page 520 note * It will be observed that the homologues of the oral tentacula of Tubularia do not exist in Lucernaria, while they are the sole prehensile organs of Coryne and Hydra.