Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:33:24.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXV.—Size in Relation to Internal Morphology. No. I.—Distribution of the Xylem in the Vascular System of Psilotum, Tmesipteris, and Lycopodium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Claude W. Wardlaw
Claude W. Wardlaw
Affiliation:
Assistant in Botany, Glasgow University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his Presidential Address to the Royal Society of Edinburgh in October 1920, Professor Bower (2) called attention to the question of Size in relation to stelar morphology, and advanced evidence (with particular reference to the Filicales) to show how the principle of similar structures has affected the internal morphology of the vascular system of plants. In dealing with the application of this principle he remarks that “the stems and roots of most plants are approximately cylindrical. The same is the case as a rule for their conducting tracts also. The cylinder is one of those solid forms in which the proportion of external surface to bulk is exceptionally low. Any deviation from the cylindrical form, either by external projections or by involutions, necessarily leads to an increase in the proportion of surface to bulk. The surface varies only as the square of the linear dimensions, but the bulk as the cube. It follows, therefore, that in carrying out any of those physiological functions of a living organism which depend on surface, as do all those of the acquisition and inter change of material, the actual size of the part which exercises that function is a matter of the greatest moment. The larger the plant is, the more dependent will it then be upon its form and detailed structure, not only for its stability, but also for the performance of its functions of absorption and transit of liquids and gases. This will apply not only to the external surface, but also to those internal surfaces which limit one tissue tract from another.” In illustration of this, examples were taken from the stems, tubers, and petioles of the Filicales, and the size-factor was also found applicable to the large prop-roots of palms, such as Areca and Verschaffeltia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , 1925 , pp. 503 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bertrand, C. Eg., “Recherches sur les Tmésiptéridées,” Archives botaniques du Nord de la France, Lille, 1881–1883.Google Scholar
2. Bower, F. O., “Size, a Neglected Factor in Stelar Morphology.” Opening Address, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xli, 1921.Google Scholar
3. Bower, F. O., “The Relation of Size to the Elaboration of Form and Structure in the Vascular Tracts in Primitive Plants,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xliii, 1923.Google Scholar
4. Bower, F. O., “Remarks on the Present Outlook on Descent.” Opening Address, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xliv, 1923.Google Scholar
5. Bower, F. O., Origin of a Land Flora. Macmillan & Co., London, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chamberlain, C. J., “Prothallia and Sporelings of Three New Zealand Species of Lycopodium,” Bot. Gaz., vol. lxiii, 1917.Google Scholar
7. Cramer, C., Pflanzenphysiologische Untersuchungen, Nägeli und Cramer, iii, 1855.Google Scholar
8. Dixon, H. H., “Transport of Organic Substances in Plants.” Presidential Address, British Association, Hull, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ford, Miss S. O., “The Anatomy of Psilotum triquetrum,” Ann. Bot., vol. xviii, 1904.Google Scholar
10. Haberlandt, G., Physiological Plant Anatomy. Macmillan & Co., 1914.Google Scholar
11. Holloway, J. E., “A Comparative Study of the Anatomy of Six New Zealand Species of Lycopodium,” Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. xlii, 1910.Google Scholar
12. Holloway, J. E., “Studies in the New Zealand Species of the Genus Lycopodium.” Part III, “The Plasticity of the Species,” Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. li, 1919.Google Scholar
13. Holloway, J. E., “The Prothallus and Young Plant of Tmesipteris,” Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 1, 1917.Google Scholar
14. Jones, C. E., “The Morphology and Anatomy of the Stem of the Genus Lycopodium,” Trans. Linn. Soc., Series 2, Bot., vol. vii, 1905.Google Scholar
15. Nägeli, W., Zeitschrift f. wiss. Botanik, Schleiden und Nägeli, iii, 1846.Google Scholar
16. Strasburger, E., “Bau und Verrichtungen der Leitungsbahnen,” Histologische Beiträge, iii, 1891.Google Scholar
17. Sykes, Miss M. G., “The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipteris,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxii, 1908.Google Scholar
18. Wigglesworth, G., “The Young Sporophytes of Lycopodium complanatum and L. clavatum,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxi, 1907.Google Scholar