Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T10:00:39.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XX.—The Genus Dictyoconus and its Allies: A Review of the Group, together with a Description of Three New Species from the Lower Eocene Beds of Northern Baluchistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Lieut.-Colonel L. M. Davies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The author recalls the various opinions which have been expressed as to the relationships of Blanckenhorn's genus Dictyoconus to other foraminiferal types. He shows how Dictyoconus has been affiliated to the genera Lituola, Lituonella, and Coskinolina by such authorities as Messrs Schlumberger, Douvillé, and Schubert in the past; but has since been dissociated from them by Professor Cushman in his recent monograph on the Foraminifera. The author then discusses the grounds for this dissociation, which seem to him to be inadequate; and he describes his discovery, in certain Lower Eocene beds of Northern Baluchistan, India, of numerous specimens of Didyoconus, Coskinolina, and Lituonella, mixed indiscriminately together within the same narrow limestone bands, and deceptively similar in external appearance. He describes the differences between these genera—differences which are confined to the peripheral portion of the test—and shows how sections of the three Indian forms reveal the closest agreement in their internal characters as a whole; their generic characters alone affording the means of distinguishing between them. He therefore regards these Indian forms as affording clear evidence of the close affiliation of these three genera. These Indian forms, which are the first representatives of their respective genera to be found so far east, are very similar to such western forms as Dictyoconus egyptiensis (Chapman), Coskinolina liburnica Stache, and Lituonella roberti Schlumberger and Douvillé; but they have individual peculiarities of their own, and so are described by the author as three new species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , 1930 , pp. 485 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Airaghi, Z. L. In, “Foraminiferi Eocenici di S. Genesio,” etc., Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat., 43, pp. 159–74. 1904.Google Scholar
(2) Airaghi, Z. L. “Il Conulites aegyptiensis Chapman c la Baculogypsina sphœrulata (Parker e Jones),” etc., Atti Soc. itnl. Sci. nat., 43, pp. 182–8, pl. 5. 1904.Google Scholar
(3) Blanckenhorn, M., “Neues zur Geologie und Paläontologie Aegyptens,” Z. deuts. Geol. Gen., vol. 52, fas. 3, pp. 403–79. 1900. (a) Pp. 419, 434–6.Google Scholar
(4) Carpenter, W. B., Parker, W. K., and Jones, T. R., “Introduction to the Study of the Foraminifera,” Ray Soc. Pub., pp. 229–35, text-figs, xxxvii and xxxviii; pl. xiii, figs. 16–17. 1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Carter, H. J., “Further Observations on the Structure of Foraminifera,” etc., J. Bombay Br. Asiat. Soc., vol. vi. 1861.Google Scholar
(6) Carter, H. J. “Further Observations on the Structure of Foraminifera,” etc., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, vol. viii (1861), pp. 309–33, 366–82, 447–70; pls. xv–xvii. 1862.Google Scholar
(7) Chapman, F., “On a Patellina-Limestone and another Foraminiferal Limestone from Egypt,” Geol. Mag. Lond., n.s., Dec, 4., vol. vii, pp. 3–17, pl. ii. 1900. (a) Pp. 11–12, pl. ii, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar
(8) Chapman, F., “The Foraminifera,” etc. 1902. (a) Pp. 135, 156–7, 276, pl. 8, figs. K, k; and fig. 36, p. 275.Google Scholar
(9) Cushman, J. A., “Fossil Fornminifera from the West Indies,” Pub. Carnegie Inst., No. 291, p. 43, text-figs. 3 1919.Google Scholar
(10) Cushman, J. A., Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res., vol. ii, pp. 80, 97, pl. 11, figs. 1–5. 1927. (a) Pp. 80–1.Google Scholar
(11) Cushman, J. A., Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res., vol. iii, p. 22, fig. 22. 1927. (a) P. 22, fig. 21; (b) pp. 22–3; (c) p. 22, pl. 5, figs. 1a–b, 2, 14, 20a–b, 21, 22, 23a–b, 24a–b.Google Scholar
(12) Cushman, J. A., “Foraminifera, their Classification and Economic Use.” 1928. (a) Pp. 105, 112, etc.; (b) pp. 128, 130, etc.; (c) pp. 124–5, pl. 13, figs. 1a–b, 2, 14, 20a–b, 21, 22, 23a–b, 24a–b; (d) pp. 178, 180–3, pl. 23.Google Scholar
(13) Davies, L. M., “Notes on the Geology of Kohat,” etc., J. Asiat. Soc. Beng., n.s., vol. xx, pp. 207–24. 1924. (a) Pp. 211, 216, 218–9.Google Scholar
(14) Davies, L. M., “Remarks on Carter's Genus Conulites (=Dictyoconoides, Nuttall),” etc., Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. lix, pp. 237–53, pls. 16–20. 1926. (a) Pp. 246–7, pl. 17, figs. 7–7b; (b) pp. 252–3, pl. 20, figs. 13–13b; (c) pp. 247–8, pl. 18, fig. 8; (d) pp. 240–5, pl. 16, figs. 1–4a, pl. 17, figs. 5–6.Google Scholar
(15) Davies, L. M., “Notes on the. Correlation of Pinfold's Chharat Series with the Eocene Stages of Sind and Europe,” Trans. Min. Geol. Insl. Ind., vol. xx, pp. 195–215. 1926. (a) Pp. 199, 202–3, 205; (b) pp. 211, 213–5.Google Scholar
(16) Davies, L. M., “The Ranikot Beds at Thal,” etc., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. lxxxiii, pp. 260–90, pls. xviii–xxii. 1927. (a) Pp. 260, 279–81, 284, pl. xxi, figs. 10–15, pl. xxii, figs. 1–6.Google Scholar
(17) Davies, L. M., “Supplement to ‘Notes on the Correlation of Pinfold's Chharat Series,’” etc., Trans. Min. Geol. Inst. Ind., vol. xxi, pp. 313–21. 1927.Google Scholar
(18) Davies, L. M., “On the Discovery of an Indian Species of Blanckenhorn's Genus Dictyoconus,” Proc. Fourteenth Indian Sci. Cong., pp. 241–2. 1927.Google Scholar
(19) Defrance, , Dict. Sci. Nat., vol. xxxii, p. 177. 1824.Google Scholar
(20) Douvillé, H., Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Ser. 3, vol. xxviii, pp. 1001–2. 1900.Google Scholar
(21) Douvillé, H., C. R. Soc. géol. Fr., n. 3, pp. 22–3. 1901.Google Scholar
(22) Douvillé, H., Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Ser. 4, vol. i, p. 156. 1901.Google Scholar
(23) Douvillé, H., “Les Foraminifères de l'Éocène dans la région do Suez,” C. R. Soc. géol. Fr., pp. 106–7. 1920.Google Scholar
(24) Douvillé, H., “Le gebel Geneffé, d'après les explorations de M. J. Barthoux,” C. R. Soc. géol. Fr., pp. 133–5. 1921.Google Scholar
(25) Douvillé, H., “Les premières Nummulites dans l'Éocène du Béarn,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. clxxviii, pp. 36–41. 1924. (a) Pp. 38–9.Google Scholar
(26) Douvillé, H., “La Forme conique chez les Foraminifères,” etc., Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Ser 4, vol. xxvi, pp. 21–6, pl. ii. 1926. (a) P. 22, text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
(27) Douvillé, , H., “L'Éocène inférieur an Nord-Ouest de l'Inde, d'après les travaux du Major Davies,” (C.R. Soc. géol. Fr., pp. 92–5. 1928. (a) P. 94.Google Scholar
(28) Douvillé, H., “Un sondage profond en Floride,” C.R. Soc. géol. Fr., p. 156. 1929.Google Scholar
(29) Fichtel, L. von, and von Moll, J. P. C., “Testacea Microscopien,” pp. 53–4, pl. vi, figs. a–d, 1803.Google Scholar
(30) Lamarck, J. B. P., Ann. Mus., vol. v, p. 243. 1804.Google Scholar
(31) Morgan, T. H., “A Critique of the Theory of Evolution,” p. 67.Google Scholar
(32) Nuttall, W. L. F., “The Stratigraphy of the Laki Series,” etc., Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. lxxxi, pp. 417–53, pls. xxiii–xxvii. 1925. (a) Pp. 432, 445, pl. xxvii, figs. 1–3; (b) table, p. 432, etc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(33) Nuttall, W. L. F., “Two Species of Eocene Foraminifera from India,” etc., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, vol. xvi, pp. 378–88, pls. xx–xxi. 1925. (a) Pp. 378, 384–7, pl. xxi, figs. 1–9; (b) pp. 378, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(34) Nuttall, W. L. F., “The Larger Foraminifera of the Upper Ranikot Series,” etc., Geol. Mag. Lond., vol. lxiii, pp. 112–21, pls. x–xi. 1926. (a) P. 119, pl. xi, figs. 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(35) Nuttall, W. L. F., “The Zonal Distribution of the Larger Foraminifera of the Eocene of Western India,” Geol. Mag. Lond., vol. lxiii, pp. 494–504. 1926. (a) P. 497; table ii, p. 498; table iii, p. 500.Google Scholar
(36) Orbigny, A. D', Ann. Sci. nat., vol. vii, p. 270. 1826.Google Scholar
(37) Orbigny, A. D'Mém. Soc. géol. Fr., Ser. 1, vol. iv, p. 39, pl. iv, figs. 3–4. 1840.Google Scholar
(38) Prever, P. L., and Silvestri, A., “Contribute allo Studio delle Orbitolininæ,” Boll. Soc. geol. ital., vol. xxiii, pp. 467–86, figs. 1–5. 1904.Google Scholar
(39) Schlumberger, C., and Douvillé, H., “Sur deux Foraminifères éocènes,” Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., Ser. 4, vol. v, pp. 291–304, text-figs. 1–7, pl. ix. 1905. (a) Pp. 298–303, pl. ix; (b) pp. 294–7, text-figs. 1–7; (c) fig. 5, pl. ix; (d) p. 301, pl. ix, figs. 3–4.Google Scholar
(40) Schubert, R. J., “Über Lituonella und Coskinolina liburica Stache sowie dcren Bcziehungen zu den anderen Dictyoconinen,” Jahrb. geol. RchsAnst. Wien, vol. lxii, pp. 195–208, pl. x. 1912. (a) P. 207; (b) pp. 199–200, 205–207.Google Scholar
(41) Silvestri, A., “Sul Dictyoconus ægyptiensis (Chapman),” Atti Ace. ‘Nuovi Lincei,’ 58, pp. 129–31, fig. 2. 1905.Google Scholar
(42) Silvestri, A., “La Chapmania gassinesis Silv.,” Riv. ital. Palœont., vol. xi, pp. 113–20, pl. ii. 1905. (a) Fig. 1, p. 115; (b) fig. 8, pl. ii; (c) figs. 6–7, pl. ii; (d) fig. 2, p. 117.Google Scholar
(43) Silvestri, A., “Sulla Diffusione stratigrafica del Genre ‘Chapmania’ Silv. e Prever,” Mem. Pont. Ace. Sci. Nuovi Lincei Roma, Ser. 2, vol. viii, pp. 31–60, pl. i. 1925. (a) P. 43, text-fig. 10; (b) p. 41, text-fig. 9; (c) p. 34, text-figs. 1–3, etc.; (d) p. 35, text-fig. 4; p. 40, text-fig. 8; (e) p. 40, text-fig. 8.Google Scholar
(44) Silvestri, A., “Rinvenimento di ‘Dictyoconus’ nell? Eocene della Isole Ionie,” Mem. Pont. Ace. Sci. Nuovi-Lincei Roma, Ser. 2, vol. ix, pp. 1–8, pl. i. 1926. (a) Pp. 6–7, text-fig, p. 7; (b) pp. 3, 5, 8, pl. i, fig. 3; (c) pl. i, figs. 1–2.Google Scholar
(45) Stache, G., “Neue Beobachtungen in den Schichten der liburnischen Stufe,” Verch. geol. RchsAnst. (StAnst.) Wien, pp. 334–8. 1875.Google Scholar
(46) Wadia, D. N., and Davies, L. M., “The Age and Origin of the Gypsum associated with the Salt Deposits of Kohat,” etc, Trans. Min. Geol. Inst. Ind., vol. xxiv, pp. 202–22, pls. 9–14. 1929. (a) P. 208.Google Scholar
(47) Williamson, W. C., “Monograph on the Recent Foraminifera of Great Britain,” Ray Soc. Pub., pp. 46–7, figs. 86–9. 1858.Google Scholar
(48) Woodring, W. P., “Middle Eocene Foraminifera of tlie Genus Dictyoconus from the Republic of Haiti,” J. Wash. Acad. Sci., vol. xii, No. 10, pp. 244–7. 1922.Google Scholar
(49) Woodring, W. P., “Some New Eocene Foraminifera of the Genus Dictyoconus,” Geology of the Republic of Haiti. Appendix I, pp. 608–10, pls. ix, xiii. 1924. (a) Pp. 608 ff., pl. ix.Google Scholar
(50) Zittel, K. A. von, “Palæontology,” vol. i. 1913. (a) P. 25.Google Scholar