Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T13:31:44.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXI.—Results of Removal and Transplantation of Ovaries.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

F. H. A. Marshall  and
W. A. Jolly
F. H. A. Marshall
Affiliation:
Carnegie Fellow and Lecturer on the Physiology of Reproduction
W. A. Jolly
Affiliation:
Assistant to the Professor of Physiology, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is well known that double ovariotomy, when performed prior to puberty, exercises a prejudicial effect not only upon the generative organs but also upon the whole organism. There is, however, some disagreement as to the results of this operation when performed after puberty, and particularly in regard to the occurrence of heat or menstruation.

It is the purpose of this paper to adduce further evidence upon this question, as well as to describe experiments the result of which indicates that the nature of the ovarian influence is chemical rather than nervous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , 1907 , pp. 589 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Amico-Roxas, , Arch. di. Obstet, e. Gin., 1901.Google Scholar
Arendt, , Naturforscher-Versammlung, 1898, Dusseldorf.Google Scholar
Crambr, , Münek. Med. Woch., 1906.Google Scholar
Basso, , Arch. f. Gynäk., vol. lxxvii., 1905.Google Scholar
Bell, , Liverpool Medico-Chirurgical Jour., 1906.Google Scholar
Benkiser, , Verhandl. der deutsch Gesell, f. Gynäk., Fourth Congress, Leipzig, 1891.Google Scholar
Bond, , Brit. Med. Jour., Part II, 1906.Google Scholar
Buys, and Vandervelte, . Quoted by Knauer.Google Scholar
Carmichael, , Jour. Obstet. and Gynæc., vol. xi., 1907.Google Scholar
Doran, , Jour. Obstet. and Gyn., vol. ii., 1902; Lancet, Part II., 1905.Google Scholar
Dudley, , Intern. Gyn. Congress, Amsterdam, 1899.Google Scholar
Foà, , Arch. Ital. de Biol., vol. xxxiv., 1900.Google Scholar
Glass, , Med. News, New York, 1899.Google Scholar
Grigorieff, , Centralbl. f. Gynäk., vol. xxi., 1899.Google Scholar
Herlitzka, , Arch. Ital. de Biol., vol. xxxiv., 1900.Google Scholar
Hobday, , Veterinary Record, vols. xii. and xiv.; Vet. Jour., vol. lxii., 1906.Google Scholar
Hofmeier, , Zeitsch. f. Geb. u. Gynäk., vol. v.Google Scholar
Knauer, , Arch. f. Gynäk. vol. lx., 1900.Google Scholar
Limon, , Jour. de Phys. et de Path. Gen., vol. xvi., 1904.Google Scholar
M'Cone, , Amer. Jour. of Obstet., vol. xl., 1899.Google Scholar
Marshall, and Jolly, , Phil. Trans. B., vol. cxcviii., 1905.Google Scholar
Meredith, , Brit. Med. Jour., Part I., 1904.Google Scholar
Morris, , New York Med. Jour., 1895 and 1906; Amer. Jour, of Obstet., 1903.Google Scholar
Pinard, and Pozzi, . See Brit. Med. Jour., Part I., 1906 (p. 883).Google Scholar
Ribbert, , Arch. f. Entwick-Mechanik., vol. vii., 1898.Google Scholar
Romanes, , Darwin and After Darwin, vol. ii., 1895.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, , St Peters. Mediz. Woch., 1899.Google Scholar
Schultz, , Centralbl. f. All. Path. u. Path. Anat., vol. xi., 1900.Google Scholar
Shattock, and Seligmann, , Royal Soc. Proc., vol. lxxiii., 1904.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, , Arch. f. Gynäk., vol. li., 1896.Google Scholar