Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:46:55.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIX.—Chromosome Linkage * and Syndesis in Œnothera†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

David G. Catcheside
David G. Catcheside
Affiliation:
Assistant in Botany, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, attempts have been made recently to bring Œnotheran cytology into lino with the parasynaptic theory of meiosis. Boedijn (2, 3) has described a peculiar conjugation of the chromosomes which he identifies as parasynaptic; Kihara (23) prefers to suppose the “doppelketten” origin of chromosome rings, such as he has found in Rumex; while Darlington (7) has put forward an extension of Belling's (1) hypothesis of segmental interchange.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , 1930 , pp. 467 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Citations

1. Belling, J. “The Attachments of Chromosomes at the Reduction Divisions in Flowering Plants,” J. Genetics, xviii, 177–205, 1927, figs. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boedijn, J. “Die typische und heterotypische Kernteilung der Œnotheren,” Zeits. f. Zellen- u. Geweblehre, i, 265–277, 1924, figs. 17.Google Scholar
3. Boedijn, J. “Die Zusammenhang zwischen Chromosomen und Mutationen bei Œ. Lamarckiana,” Rec. Trav. bot. Néerlandais, xxii, 173–261, 1925, figs. 32.Google Scholar
4. Cleland, R. K. “Chromosome Arrangements during Meiosis in Certain Œnotheras,” Amer. Naturalist, lvii, 562–566, 1923, figs. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cleland, R. E. “Chromosome Behaviour during Meiosis in the Pollen Mother-cells of Certain Œnotheras,” Amer. Naturalist, lix, 475–479, 1925, figs. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cleland, R. E. “The Genetics of Œnothra in relation to Chromosome Behaviour, with Special Reference to Certain Hybrids,” Verh. d. V. Int. Kongr. Vererb., i, 554–567, 1927.Google Scholar
7. Darlington, C. D. “Ring Formation in Œnothera and other Genera,” J. Genetics, xx, 345–364, 1929, 1 diagram.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. East, E. M., and Hayes, H. K.. “Further Experiments on Inheritance in Maize,” Bull. Conn. Ayr. Exp. Stat., No. 188, pp. 31, 1915, 7 pls. (Cited by L. W. Sharp, Introduction to Cytology, 1926.)Google Scholar
9. Gates, R. R. “A Study of Reduction in Œnothera rubrinervis,” Bot. Gazette, xlvi, 1–34, 1908, pls. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gates, R. R. “The Behaviour of the Chromosomes in Œnothera lata × Œ. gigas,” Bot. Gazette, xlviii, 179–199, 1909, pls. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gates, R. R. “The Trisomic Mutations of Œnothera,” Ann. Bot., xxxvii, 543–563, 1923, pl. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gates, R. R. “The Chromosomes of a Triploid Œnothera Hybrid,” Ann. Bot., xxxvii. 565–569, 1923, pl. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gates, R. R. “The Cytology of Œnothera,” Bib. Genet., iv, 401–492, 1928, figs. 39.Google Scholar
14. Gates, R. R., and Sheffield, F. M. L.. “Chromosome Linkage in Certain Œnothera Hybrids,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, ccxvii, 367–394, 1929, pls. 2, figs. 7.Google Scholar
15. Gates, R. R., and Thomas, N.. “A Cytological Study of Œnothera mut. lata and Œ. mut. semilata in Relation to Mutation,” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., lix, 523–571, 1914, pls. 3, figs. 7.Google Scholar
16. Geerts, J. M. “Cytologische Untersuchungen ciniger Bastarde von Œnothera gigas,” Ber. d. deul. bot. Gesells., xxix, 160–166, 1911, pl. 1.Google Scholar
17. Håkansson, A. “Beiträge zur Zytologie eines Epilobium-Bastardes,” Bot. Notiser, 1924, 269–278, figs. 23.Google Scholar
18. Håkansson, A. “Zur Zytologie der Gattung Godetia,” Hereditas, vi, 257–274, 1925, figs. 64.Google Scholar
19. Håkansson, A. “Über das Verhalten der Chromosomen bei der heterotypischen Teilung schwedischer Œnothera Lamarckiana und eineger ihrer Mutanten und Bastarde,” Hereditas, viii, 255–304, 1926, pl. 1, fig. 5.Google Scholar
20. Håkansson, A. “Die Reduktionsteilung in den Samenanlagen einiger Œnotheren,” Hereditas, xi, 129–181, 1928.Google Scholar
21. Hance, R. T. “Variations in the Number of Somatic Chromosomes in Œnothera scintillans de Vries,” Genetics, iii, 225–275, 1918, pls. 7, figs. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Ishikawa, M. “Studies on the Embryo-sac and Fertilization in Œnothera,” Ann. Bot., xxxii, 279–317, 1918, pls. 7, figs. 34.Google Scholar
23. Kihara, H. “Über das Verhalten ‘end-to-end’ gebunden Chromosomen von Rumex acelosella und Œnothera bieunis wahrend der heterotypischen Kernteilung,” Jahrb.f. wiss. Bol., lxvi, 429–460, 1927, figs. 89.Google Scholar
24. Leliveld, J. A. “Some Remarks on the Cytology of Œnothera,” Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerlandais, xxva, 237–243, 1928, figs. 6.Google Scholar
25. Lutz, A. M. “Œnothera Mutants with Diminutive Chromosomes,” Amer. J. Bot., iii, 502–526, 1916, pl. 1, figs. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Van Overeem, C. “Über Formen mit abweichender Chromosomenzahl bei Œnothera,” Beih. Bot. Centralbl., xxxix, 1–79, 1922, pls. 15, figs. 8.Google Scholar
27. Renner, O. “Versuche uber die gametische Konstitution der Œnotheren,” Zeitschr. f. Abst. u. Vererb., xviii, 121–294, 1917, figs. 48.Google Scholar
28. Schwemmle, J. “Vergleichend zytologische Untersuchungen an Onagracecn. II. Die Reduktionsteilung von Encharidium concinnuum,” Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., lxv, 778–818, 1926, pls. 10.Google Scholar
29. Sheffield, F. M. L. “Cytological Studies of Certain Meiotic Stages in Œnothera,” Ann. Bot., xli, 779–816, 1927, pls. 3, figs. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Sheffield, F. M. L. “Chromosome Linkage in Œnothera, with Special Reference to some F1 Hybrids,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, cv, 207–230, 1929, pls. 2.Google Scholar
31. Shull, G. H. “The Third Linkage Group in Œnothera,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., xi, 715–718, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Shull, G. H. “Œnothera Cytology in Relation to Genetics,” Amer. Nat., lxii, 97–114, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Valcanover, R. “Contribution à l'étude de la réduction dans l'Œnothera biennis,” La Cellule, xxxvii, 203–222, 1926, pls. 3.Google Scholar
34. Von Wettstein, F. “Kreuzungsversuche mit multiploiden Moosrassen,” Biol. Centralbl., xliii, 71–83, 1923, 1 graph.Google Scholar