Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:23:51.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Karoo tupilakosaurid: a relict from Gondwana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Anne Warren
Anne Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3083
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new temnospondyl, Thabanchuia oomie gen. et sp. nov., is described from three skulls and associated postcranial elements from the Early Triassic Lystrosaurus Zone of South Africa. T. oomie is the best-preserved member of the Tupilakosauridae, a temnospondyl taxon previously known only from disarticulated material from Russia and Greenland, but shown here to include Kourerpeton bradyi, an articulated specimen with no locality data but presumed to be from North America. Tupilakosaurids are the only Mesozoic survivors of the dvinosaurian radiation, the sister group to the archegosaurs of the Permian plus the stereospondyl clade. It is postulated that their occurrence in Russia, Greenland and North America represents a reinvasion from Gondwana, where they survived the Late Permian extinctions along with the stem of the stereospondyl clade. T. oomie is probably immature but, like other members of the dvinosaurian clade, was fully aquatic, had ossified ceratobranchials and most likely an increased number of vertebrae and reduced limbs. Like Tupilakosaurus, T. oomie had diplospondylous centra.

Keywords

anatomyceratobranchialdiplospondylyDvinosauriaphylogenySouth AfricatemnospondylTriassic.
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , 1998 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandyopadhyay, S. 1988. A kannemeyeriid dicynodont from the Middle Triassic Yerrapalli Formation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 320, 185–233.Google Scholar
Bolt, J. R. 1974. Evolution and functional interpretation of some suture patterns in Paleozoic labyrinthodont amphibians and other lower tetrapods. Journal of Paleontology 48, 434–58.Google Scholar
Brandtoft, E. 1972. A new description of Tupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen with an evaluation of the phylogenetic relationship of the species. MSc Thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark [in Danish].Google Scholar
Bystrow, A. P. 1938. Dvinosaurus als neotenische form der Stegocephalen. Acta Zoologica Stockholm 19, 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, C. L. 1956. Triassic dicynodonts compared. Memoirs of the University of California 13, 305–41.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1996. Elongate early tetrapods: why 'Lizzie' had little limbs. Special Papers in Paleontology 52, 139–48.Google Scholar
Case, E. C. 1935. Description of a collection of associated skeletons of Trimerorhachis. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 4, 227–40.Google Scholar
Chase, J. N. 1965. Neldasaurus wrightae, a new rhachitomous labyrinthodont from the Texas Lower Permian. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 133, 156–225.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. Clack, J. A. 1991. Fish-like gills and breathing in the earliest known tetrapod. Nature 352, 234–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. I. Clack, J. A. 1995. ROMER's gap: tetrapod origins and terrestriality. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle: Paris 17, 373–88.Google Scholar
Coldiron, R. W. 1978. Acroplous vorax Hotton (Amphibia, Saurerpetontidae) restudied in light of new material. American Museum Novitates 2662, 1–27.Google Scholar
Damiani, R. J. Warren, A. 1996. A new look at members of the superfamily Brachyopoidea (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the Early Triassic of Queensland and a preliminary analysis of brachyopoid relationships. Alcheringa 20, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman, B. C. 1990. A revision of the cranial morphology of the Lower Permian temnospondyl amphibian Acroplous vorax Hotton. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 10, 390–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, C. 1975. Tetrapod limblessness: evolution and functional corollaries. American Zoologist 15, 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. 1983. Gnathostome vertebrae and the classification of the Amphibia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 79, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goette, A. 1897. über den Wirbelbau bei den Reptilien und einigen anderen Wirbelthieren. Zeitschrift fuer Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 62, 343–94.Google Scholar
Huene, F. von 1959. Neues über Tupilakosaurus. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Monatshefte 5, 230–3.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1865. On a collection of vertebrate fossil from the Panchet rocks, near Ranigunj, Bengal. Palaeontologia Indica (4) 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Jupp, R. Warren, A. A., 1986. The mandibles of the Triassic labyrinthodont amphibians. Alcheringa 10, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, J. W. 1977. The distribution of the Karoo vertebrate fauna. Bernard Price Institute Memoir 1, 1–129.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. Reisz, R. R. 1997. A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny. In Sumida, S. Martin, K. L. M. (eds) Amniote Origins. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1990. The radiations of temnospondyl amphibians. In Taylor, P. D. Larwood, G. P. (eds) Major Evolutionary Radiations, Systematics Association Special Volume 42, 321–49. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. 1954. Tupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen n. g. et n. sp., an interesting Batrachomorph from the Triassic of East Greenland. Meddelelser om GrØnland 72, 1–33.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. 1967. New observations on the skull roof of the holotype of Tupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 47, 225–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochev, V. G. Shishkin, M. A. 1989. On the principles of global correlation of the continental Triassic on the tetrapods. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 34, 149–73.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1962. Late Permian terrestrial vertebrates USA and USSR. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 52, 1–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1979. Aspects of the biology of Trimerorhachis (Amphibia, Temnospondyli). Journal of Paleontology 53, 1–17.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. Lammers, G. E. 1976. A new brachyopoid amphibian. In Churcher, C. S. (ed.) Athlon: Essays in palaeontology in honour of Loris Shano Russell, Miscellaneous Publication of the Royal Ontario Museum, 45–57. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1977. The origin and early evolution of tetrapod vertebrae. In Andrews, S. M., Miles, R. S. Walker, A. D. (eds) Problems in Vertebrate Evolution, Linnean Society Symposium Series 4, 289–318. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1947. Review of the Labyrinthodontia. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 99, 1–367.Google Scholar
Sequeira, S. E. K. Milner, A. R. 1996. A revision of the family Saurerpetontidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) from the Pennsylvanian and Permian of North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16, 64A.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M. A. 1961. New data on Tupilakosaurus. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 136, 938–41.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M. A. 1967. A brachyopid labyrinthodont from the Triassic of the Russian platform. International Geological Review 1967 9, 93–108.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M. A. 1973. The morphology of the early Amphibia and some problems of the lower tetrapod evolution. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta 137, 1–260.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M. A. 1989. On the resegmentation of vertebrae in the early tetrapods. Acta Musei Reginaehradecensis S. A.: Scientiae Naturales 22, 105–15.Google Scholar
Shishkin, M. A., Rubidge, B. S. Hancox, P. J. 1995. Vertebrate biozonation of the Upper Beaufort Series of South Africa—a new look on correlation of the Triassic biotic events in Euramerica and Southern Gondwana. In Sun, A. Wang, Y. (eds) Sixth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota, short papers, 1995, 39–41. Beijing: China Ocean Press.Google Scholar
Tripathi, C., Dass, S. Jamwal, J. S. 1983. A record of labyrinthodont vertebrac from the Lower Triassic limestone of Matauli Section, Githi Valley, Kumaon Higher Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 29, 102–5.Google Scholar
Warren, A. Marsicano, C. 1998. A reappraisal of the members of the Family Brachyopidae from the Triassic of the Sydney, Carnarvon and Tasmania Basins, Australia. Alcheringa 22, 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1926. The evolution and origin of the Amphibia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 214, 189–257.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1956. The brachyopid labyrinthodonts. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History): Geology 8, 317–91.Google Scholar
Williston, S. W. 1915. Trimerorhachis, a Permian temnospondyl amphibian. Journal of Geology 23, 246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, A. M. 1996. New material of the small temnospondyl Lapillopsis from the Early Triassic Arcadia Formation of Australia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16, 74A.Google Scholar
Yates, A. M. Warren, A. A. (in press). The phylogeny of the 'higher temnospondyls' (Vertebrata, Choanata). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London.Google Scholar