Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:59:33.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diplodoselache woodi gen. et sp. nov., an early Carboniferous shark from the Midland Valley of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

John R. F. Dick
John R. F. Dick
Affiliation:
25 Harington Green, Formby, Liverpool L37 1 PN, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new fossil elasmobranch from the Lower Carboniferous Oil Shale groups (Viséan) of the Edinburgh area shows a mosaic of characters typical of at least two groups of early sharks. Its most distinctive feature is the small bicuspid teeth of “Diplodus” type. This, together with the long dorsal fin and the structure of the single, shallowly inserted dorsal spine, form a suite of characters previously considered unique to late Palaeozoic xenacanth sharks. Other features, such as the large equilobate tail and the structure of the pectoral fins, may have been retained from an ancestor of a more typical Palaeozoic elasmobranch appearance found in anacanthous and ctenacanth sharks. It is suggested that the xenacanths evolved from an ancestor within the anacanth-ctenacanth assemblage early in Carboniferous times and became adapted to a freshwater environment. This ancestor probably possessed a complex dermal skeleton including growing scales with both thickened and thin concave bases.

The fauna of the fish-bearing nodules amongst which this shark has been found is interpretedas being lagoonal in origin. The shark was probably a medium sized (c. 0·75–2·0 m lng)predator inhabiting the surface waters of the lagoon.

Keywords

ElasmobranchiiXenacanthiformesViséanCalciferous Sandstone Seriesskeletal anatomy
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , 1981 , pp. 99 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1833–1844. Recherches sur les poissions fossiles (5 vols). Neuchâtel & Soleure.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, F. M. 1876. The development of elasmobranch fishes. JANAT PHYSIOL LONDON 11, 128–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Balfour, F. M. 1881. On the development of the skeleton of the paired fins of Elasmobranchii, considered in relation to its bearings on the nature of the Vertebrata. PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON 1881, 656–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix-Almgreen, S. E. 1975. The paired fins and shoulder girdle in Cladoselache, their morphology and phyletic significance. COLLOO INT CENT NATL RECH SCI 218, 111–23.Google Scholar
Brongniart, C. 1888. Sur un nouveau poisson fossile du terrain houiller de Commentry (Allier), Pleuracanthus gaudryi. BULL SOC GEOL FRANCE (3) 16, 546–50.Google Scholar
Davis, J. W. 1892. On the fossil fish-remains of the Coal-Measures of the British Islands. Part 1. Pleuracanthidae. SCI TRANS R DUBLIN SOC (2) 4, 703–48.Google Scholar
Dean, B. 1909. Studies on fossil fishes (Sharks, chimaeroids and arthrodires). MEM AMER MUS NAT HIST 9, 221–87.Google Scholar
Dick, I. R. F. 1976. Lower Carboniferous Chondrichthyans from the Scottish Oil Shale Group. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Newcastle upon Tyne University.Google Scholar
Dick, J. R. F. 1978. On the Carboniferous shark Tristychius arcuatus Agassiz from Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 70, 63–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, J. R. F. & Maisey, J. G. 1980. The Scottish Lower Carboniferous shark Onychoselache traquairi. PALAEONTOLOGY 23, 363–74.Google Scholar
Fournier, G. & Pruvost, P. 1922. Découverte d'un poisson nouveau dans le Marbre noir de Denée. BULL ACAD R BELG CL SCI (5) 8, 210–18.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1889. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens, Band 2, Heft 4, 98–112. Prague: Rivnac.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1890. Fauna der Gaskohle under der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens, Band 3, Heft 1, 1–48. Prague: Rivnac.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, C. 1873. Über das Archipterygium. JENA Z NATUR-WISS 7, 131–41.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, G. R. 1832. Notices of new genera and species. In Curvier, G. (English trans, by Griffith E.) The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organisation, Vol. 14 Insecta. London: Whitaker, Treacher.Google Scholar
Greensmith, J. T. 1965. Calciferous Sandstone Series sedimentation at the eastern end of the Midland Valley of Scotland. J SEDIM PETROL 35, 223–42.Google Scholar
Gross, W. 1973. Kleinschuppen, Flossenstacheln und Zähne von Fischen aus Europäischen und Nordamerikanischen Bonebeds des Devons. PALAEONTOGRAPHICA (A) 142, 51–155.Google Scholar
Harris, J. E. 1951. Diademodus hydei, a new fossil shark from the Cleveland Shale. PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON 120, 683–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotton, N. 1952. Jaws and teeth of American xenacanth sharks. J PALEONTOL 26, 489–500.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1906. Neue Rekonstructionen von Pleuracanthus sessilis und Polyacrodus (Hybodus) hauffianus. SITZUNGSBER GES NATURFORSCH FREUNDE BERLIN 1906, 155–9.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1965. On the origin of girdles and paired fins. ISRAEL J ZOOL 14, 141–72.Google Scholar
Moore, L. R. 1968. Cannel coal, bogheads and oil shales. In Murchison, D. G. & Westoll, T. S. (eds) Coal and coal-bearing strata, 19–29. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. 1936. The structure and affinities of the fossil elasmobranch fishes from the Lower Carboniferous rocks of Glencartholm, Eskdale. PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON 1936, 761–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. 1939. The early evolution and relationships of the elasmobranchs. BIOL REV 14, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. & Miles, R. S. 1971. Palaeozoic fishes, 2nd edn.London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørvig, T. 1966. Histological studies of ostracoderms, placoderms and fossil elasmobranchs. 2. On the dermal skeleton of two late Palaeozoic elasmobranchs. ARK ZOOL (2) 19, 1–39.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. 1967. Class Selachii. In Harland, W. B.et al. (eds) The fossil record, 666–73. Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1810. Indice d'ittiologia Siciliana. Messina.Google Scholar
Reif, W.-E. 1978. Types of morphogenesis of the dermal skeleton in fossil sharks. PALÄONTOL Z 52, 110–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate paleontology, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. 1967. Comments on elasmobranch evolution. In Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F. & Rail, D. P. (eds) Sharks, skates and rays, 3–35. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. 1975. Comments on the origin and basic radiation of the gnathostome fishes with particular reference to their feeding mechanism. COLLOQ INT CENT NATL RECH SCI 218, 101–9.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. & Williams, M. 1977. Relationships of fossil and living elasmobranchs. AM ZOOL 17, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stensiö, E. A. 1961. Permian vertebrates. In Raasch, G. O. (ed.) Geology of the Arctic, 231–47. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Thacher, J. K. 1877. Median and paired fins; a contribution to the history of vertebrate limbs. TRANS CONNECTICUT ACAD ARTS SCI 3, 281–310.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1881. Notice of new fish remains from the Black-band Ironstone of Borough Lee near Edinburgh. GEOL MAG (2) 8, 34–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1884. Description of a fossil shark (Ctenacanthus costellatus) from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Eskdale, Dumfriesshire. GEOL MAG (3) 1, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1888. Notes on Carboniferous Selachii. GEOL MAG (3) 5, 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1903. On the distribution of fossil fish-remains in the Carboniferous rocks of the Edinburgh district. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 40, 687–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, C. D. 1954. Catalogue of the type and figured specimens of fossil fishes and amphibians in the Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh. TRANS EDINBURGH GEOL SOC 16 (1), 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S. 1968. Vertebrate faunas of coal-bearing strata. In Murchison, D. G. & Westoll, T. S. (eds) Coal and coal-bearing strata, 179–93. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Wood, S. P. 1975. Recent discoveries of Carboniferous fishes in Edinburgh. SCOTT J GEOL 11, 251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1908. The fossil fishes of the Hawkesbury series at St Peters. MEM GEOL SURV NEW SOUTH WALES PALAEONTOL 10, 1–32.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1924. On a hybodont shark (Trisrycfuus) from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Eskdale (Dumfriesshire). Q J GEOL SOC LONDON 80, 338–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1968. The morphology and developmental history of the scales of the Paleozoc sharks Hofmesella? sp. and Orodus. PROC 4TH NOBEL SYMP STOCKHOLM (1967), 399–412.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1973. Interrelationships of early chondrichthyans. In Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S. & Patterson, C. (eds) Interrelationships of fishes, 1–14. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. & Case, G. R. 1976. Cobelodus aculeatus (Cope) an anacanthous shark from Pennsylvanian black shales of North America. PALAEONTOGRAPHICA (A) 154, 107–203.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. & Richardson, E. S. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. FIELDIANA GEOL MEM 4, 1–352.Google Scholar