Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:36:27.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science and Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Paolo Parrini
Paolo Parrini*
Affiliation:
University of Florence
*
Paolo Parrini, Department of Philosophy, University of Florence, via Bolognese 52, 50139 Florence, Italy Email: Parrini@unifi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paolo Parrini discusses here the links between science and philosophy from an epistemological viewpoint, addressing the problem by distinguishing between its historical and theoretical dimensions. He discusses the necessary link between formal epistemology and history, and in this frame identifies different areas of intersection between science and philosophy.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 4: Philosophical Reflections Across Cultures , November 2010 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boniolo, Giovanni, Dorato, Mauro eds. (2001) La legge di natura. Analisi storico-critica di un concetto. Milan: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Calosi, Claudio (in press) “Minimality, Geometry and Simultaneity” in Iris.Google Scholar
Casamonti, Michele, Le legge di natura. Per un’interpretazione epistemica. Milan: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
De Finetti, Bruno (1989) La logica dell’incerto, ed. Mondadori, M., Milan: Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Gimbel, Steven, Walz, Anke eds. (2006) Defending Einstein. Hans Reichenbach's Writings on Space, Time and Motion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962/1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. International Encyclopedia of United Science Vol. 2 Number 2, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, Roberta ed. (2003) Mente e corpo. La soggettività fra scienza e filosofia. Milan: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
Malament, David (1977) “Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity”, Noûs 11, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrini, Paolo (2004) Filosofia e scienza nell’Italia del Novecento. Figure, correnti, battaglie. Milan: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
Parrini, Paolo (2009) “La scienza come ragione pensante” in Pianeta Galileo 2008, ed. Peruzzi, A. Florence: Consiglio Regionale della Toscana. (English trans., “Science as Thinking Reason”, Diogenes, 224 2009, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
Parrini, Paolo (in press) “Epistemological Conventionalism beyond the Geochronometrical Problems” in De Caro, Mario e Rosaria Egidi eds. Architecture of Theoretical and Practical Knowledge. Epistemology, Agency and Sciences. Rome: Carocci (in press).Google Scholar
Peruzzi, Alberto (2009) Modelli della spiegazione scientifica. Florence: Firenze University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1921) “Der gegenwärtige Stand der Relativitätsdiskussion” in Logos 10, 316–378, English trans. Maria Reichenbach in Reichenbach, Hans (1959) Modern Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra, Stachel, John (1999) “Did Malament Prove the Non-Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity?” in Philosophy of Science 66, 208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, Paul Arthur (1951) ed. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz (1918, 1925 2) Allgemeine Erkenntslehre, Ital. trans. Teoria generale della conoscenza. Milan: Angeli. (English trans., General Theory of Knowledge. Wien / New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974).Google Scholar