Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T14:18:40.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Priori, Objectivity, and Judgement Crossing the Paths of Kantianism, Phenomenology and Neo-Empiricism: A Tribute to Giulio Preti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Paolo Parrini
Paolo Parrini*
Affiliation:
University of Florence, Italy
*
Paolo Parrini, Department of Humanities, Piazza Brunelleschi, 3-4, Firenze 50121, Italy. Email: parrini@unifi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Tribute
Information
Diogenes , Volume 61 , Issue 2: Trends and Debates in Contemporary Epistemology , May 2014 , pp. 59 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carnap, R (1956) Meaning postulates [1952]. In Carnap, R, Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 222–229.Google Scholar
Carnap, R (1961) Der logische Aufbau der Welt * Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie [1928]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Costa, V, Franzini, E, Spinicci, P (2002) La fenomenologia. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D (2006) Hintikka on phenomenology. In Auxier, RE, Hahn, LE (eds) The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 373–387.Google Scholar
Gutting, G (1971) Husserl and logical empiricism, Metaphilosophy, 2: 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M (1975) Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1976) Sein und Zeit [1927]. In Gesamtausgabe 2. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann. [English trans. Being and Time by Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: State University of New York Press 1996].Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1979) Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs [1925]. In Gesamtausgabe 20. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1991) Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik [1929]. In Gesamtausgabe 5. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1992) History of the Concept of Time, transl. by Kiesel, Th. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J (2006) Reply to Dagfinn Føllesdal. In Auxier, RE, Hahn, LE (eds) The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 388–391.Google Scholar
Huemer, W (2003) Logical empiricism and phenomenology: Felix Kaufmann. In Stadler, F (ed.) The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism, Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E (1950) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie [1913]. In Husserl, E, Gesammelte Werke, iii. Nijhoff: The Hague.Google Scholar
Husserl, E (1984) Logische Untersuchungen [1900]. In Husserl, E, Gesammelte Werke, XIX-1. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1995) Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können [1783]. In Kants Werke, Akademie Textausgabe, IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, pp. 253–383.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1998) Kritik der reinen Vernuft [1781/1787]. In Kants Werke, Akademie Textausgabe, IV & III. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. [English trans. Critique of Pure Reason, trans., ed. Guyer, P, Wood, AW, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998].Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1940) Phenomenology and logical empiricism. In Farber, M (ed.) Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 124–142.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1941) Strata of experience, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1: 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1978) The Infinite in Mathematics: Logico-Mathematical Writings, ed. by McGuinness, B. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2003) Schlick and Husserl on the essence of knowledge. In Parrini, P, Salmon, M, Salmon, W (eds) Logical Empiricism. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2004) Fenomeno e cosa in sé: tre livelli di impossibilità fenomenologica. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) Fenomenologia applicata. Esempi di analisi descrittiva. Milan: Guerini, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2006a) La nozione fenomenologica di dato. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, R (ed.) (2006b) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2007) Filosofia della conoscenza. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Livingston, P (2002) Husserl and Schlick on the logical form of experience, Synthese, 132: 239–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraglia, R (2006) Dove iniziano gli a priori materiali? Schlick, Wittgenstein e le radici di un equivoco. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Mohanty, JN (1996) Kant and Husserl, Husserl Studies, 13: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrini, P (1998) Knowledge and Reality. An Essay in Positive Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2002) L’empirismo logico. Aspetti storici e prospettive teoriche. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2006) A priori materiale e forme trascendentali della conoscenza. Alcuni interrogativi epistemologici. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2011) Il valore della verità. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2012) Fenomenologia ed empirismo logico. In Cimino, A, Costa, V (eds) Storia della fenomenologia. Rome: Carocci, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2014) About the parting of the ways: three roads or four? Schlick's reviews for the Viertteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie and Husserl's phenomenology, Philosophical Inquiries, ii(2): 141–177.Google Scholar
Piazza, T (2002) Fenomenologia nell’Aufbau? Carnap, Husserl e la costituzione del mondo. In Lanfredini, R(ed.) Forma e contenuto. Aspetti di teoria della conoscenza, della mente e della morale. Milan: LED, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
Piazza, T (2004) The quest for the synthetic a priori: Husserl's and Schlick's debate revisited. In Chrudzimski, A, Huemer, W (eds) Phenomenology and Analysis. Essays on Central European Philosophy. Heusenstamm: Ontos-Verlag. pp. 233–256.Google Scholar
Preti, G (2002) Écrits philosophiques. Les Lumières du rationalisme italien, Textes choisis et présentés par Scarantino, L. M. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Quine, WVO (1961) Two dogmas of empiricism [1951]. In Quine, WVO, From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, WVO (1977) Truth by convention [1936]. In Quine, WVO, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T (2011) Kant and Phenomenology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1925) Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre [1918]. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M (1969a) Gibt es ein materiales Apriori? [1930]. In Schlick, M, Gesammelte Aufsätze 1926–1936, ed. Waismann, F. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1969b) Form and Content. An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking [1932]. In Schlick, M, Gesammelte Aufsätze 1926–1936, ed. Waismann, F. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, pp. 159–249.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1979) Philosophical Papers, ed. Mulder, HL, Van de Velde-Schlick, BFB. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shelton, J (1988) Schlick and Husserl on the foundations of phenomenology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48: 557–561.10.2307/2107481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P (1992) Wittgenstein, Schlick and the a priori. In Simons, P, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, F, ed. (1997) Phänomenologie und Logischer Empirismus: Zentenarium Felix Kaufmann. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W (1957) Das Wahrheitsproblem und die Idee der Semantik. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Pitte, M (1984) Schlick's critique of phenomenological propositions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45: 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar