Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:54:23.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Non- and Anti-Democratic in Post-Modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Masahiro Hamashita*
Affiliation:
Kobe College

Abstract

Is, or has, democracy a universal value? This is the main question raised by this paper, which distinguishes between two aspects of democracy: political institution in opposition to despotism, and political belief against any kind of slavery and subordination. The role played by intellectuals in the development of contemporary democracy, and the relation of democracy to mass culture and the influence of mass media on a true democratic attitude, are studied within the frame of an overall ‘mass aesthetization' which characterizes contemporary societies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hallowell, John H. (1946) The Decline of Liberalism as an Ideology. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hallowell, John H. (1954) The Moral Foundation of Democracy. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1985) Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. by Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert (2003) Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre (1950) ‘Tyranny and Wisdom’, in Leo Strauss, On Tyranny. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1955) Die deutsche Katastrophe. Wiesbaden: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth (1959) Die verspätete Nation. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Kenneth R. (2004) ‘Philosophic Roots, The Role of Leo Strauss, and the War in Iraq’, in Stelzer, Irwin (ed.), Neoconservatism. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar