Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:18:21.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defense of Utopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Lyman Tower Sargent
Lyman Tower Sargent*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Missouri-St Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a number of recent and forthcoming articles and papers, I have argued that while utopia can be dangerous, utopian visions are absolutely essential, that we must choose utopia. Today, I want to try to give you the essence of that argument while also relating it to some new issues. Let me summarize my argument:

  1. 1. Hope/desire for a better life in this life is a central aspect of the human experience.

  2. 2. That hope/desire has often been distorted by ideology and religion.

  3. 3. That hope/desire has often been captured to serve the economic and political ends of the powerful.

  4. 4. When that hope/desire is distorted or captured, it can become dangerous.

  5. 5. That danger usually comes about because the hope/desire is warped so that the better life is only for a select few or in-group, thus creating an out-group, an other, who can be neglected, harmed, even killed to achieve the end. Such groups have included members of other religions, indigenous peoples, other ethnic groups, ideologies, and so forth. The boundaries of the other have often been changed to include some formerly in the in-group.

  6. 6. Even so, that hope/desire for a better life is the only effective means of overcoming such distortion/capture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almog, Shulamit (2001) ‘Literary Legal Utopias - Alexander’s Visit to Kasiah and Law at the End of Days’, Utopian Studies 12(2): 164–173.Google Scholar
Almog, Shulamit and Reichman, Amon (2003) ‘On Law and Utopia: Rules vs. Principles. A Comment on Ramiro Avilés’s Reply’, Utopian Studies 14(1): 143–148.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1990a) ‘The Apotheosis of the Romantic Will: The Revolt Against the Myth of an Ideal World’, in his The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas, ed. Hardy, Henry, pp. 207–237. London: John Murray. Originally published in Italian in Lettere italiane 27 (1975).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1990b) Decline of Utopian Ideas in the West. Tokyo: The Japan Foundation, 1978. Rpt. as ‘The Decline of Utopian Ideas in the West’ in his The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas: 20–48.Google Scholar
Camus, Albert (1972) Neither Victims nor Executioners, trans. Dwight Macdonald. Chicago: World Without War Publications. Originally published in Combat (1946) and trans. in Politics (July-August 1947).Google Scholar
Davis, J[ames] C[olin] (1981) Utopia and the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing 1516-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop (1967) ‘Varieties of Literary Utopias’, in Utopias and Utopian Thought, ed. Manuel, Frank E.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1967; London: Souvenir Press, 1973, pp. 25–49. Originally published in Daedalus 94(2) (spring 1965): 323–347.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. Buckminster (1969) Utopia or Oblivion: The Prospects for Humanity. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1971) A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Polak, Fred[erick] L[odewijk] (1961) The Image of the Future: Enlightening the Past, Orientating the Present, Forecasting the Future, trans. Elise Boulding, 2 vols. Leyden: A. W. Sythoff; New York: Oceana Publications. Originally published as De Toekomst is verleden tijd: Cultuur-futuristische verkenningen, 2 vols, Utrecht: W. de Haan, 1955. Reprinted as The Image of the Future, trans. and abridged Elise Boulding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.Google Scholar
Ramiro Avilés, Miguel Á[ngel] (2003) ‘On Law and Utopia: A Reply to Shulamit Almog’, Utopian Studies 14(1): 132–142.Google Scholar
Ramiro Avilés, Miguel Á[ngel] (2002) Utopía y derecho: El sistema jurídico en las sociedades ideales. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Instituto de Derechos Humanos ‘Bartolomé de Las Casas’/Marcel Pons Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (1966) ‘Existentialism and Utopianism: A Reply to Frederick L. Polak’, The Minnesota Review 6(1): 72–75.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (1994) ‘The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited’, Utopian Studies 5(1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (2003) ‘The Problem of the “Flawed Utopia”: A Note on the Costs of Utopia’ in Baccolini, Raffaella and Moylan, Tom (eds), Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, pp. 225–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (2004b) ‘Utopische Literatur und die Schaffung nationaler und personaler Identitäten’ [Utopianism and the Politics of Identity], in Rüsen, Jörn and Fehr, Michael (eds), Die Unruhe der Kultur: Potentiale des Utopischen. Weilerswist: Velbrueck Publishers.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (2004a) ‘The Necessity of Utopian Thinking: A Cross-National Perspective’, in Rüsen, Jörn, Fehr, Michael and Rieger, Thomas W. (eds), Thinking Utopia: Steps Into Other Worlds, pp. 1–14. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower (2006) Contemporary Political Ideologies: A Comparative Analysis, 13th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Talmon, Jacob (1957) Utopianism and Politics. London: Conservative Political Centre.Google Scholar
Williams, George H[untston] (1962) Wilderness and Paradise in Christian Thought: The Biblical Experience in the History of Christianity & the Paradise Theme in the Theological Idea of the University. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar