Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T00:28:26.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hominization and Apes

An Unnatural Kinship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Frédéric Joulian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of human origins is a kaleidoscopic field, a multitude of objects, reflections, and disciplines a swirl in an ever-changing tumult. The extreme diversity of the elements of information that are indispensable to this field of study (teeth, bones, apes, genes, ancient objects, present-day objects, biomechanical factors, cultural constructions …) appears all by itself to be enough to consign any attempt at synthesis to the realm of the Utopian. It hardly seems reasonable to expect the disparate sciences that fuel the field (paleoanthropology, archaeology, molecular biology, physics, psychology, and others) and the contradictory conceptions of scientific activity that they defend (human sciences, natural sciences, experimental sciences, exact sciences) to be joined with any regularity. As for formulating an overall problematics of the interdependent phenomena encountered in the field, one would have to be more than optimistic to entertain such dreams. And yet this is exactly the program that prehistory and paleoanthropology are laboring to construct tinder the label “the study of the origins of man,” an expression that includes both diachronic processes (human evolution) and activities or behaviors from particular moments, elements that are exceedingly difficult to compare given the separation of their geographic and temporal contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 45 , Issue 180 , December 1997 , pp. 73 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanckaert, C., 1998. “La 'naturalisation' de l'Homme de Linne à Darwin. Archéologie du débat Nature/Culture,” in A. and Ducros, J. and Joulian, F., eds. La culture est-elle naturelle? Histoire, épistémologie et applications récentes du concept de culture.Google Scholar
Boesch-Achermann, H. and Boesch, C., 1994. “Hominization in the rainforest: the chimpanzee's piece of the puzzle.” Evolutionary Anthropology 3 (1): 9–16.Google Scholar
Brugal, J.-Ph., 1995. “Archéologie et zoologie pour un nouveau concept, la paléoéthologie humaine.” Préhistoire Anthropologie Méditerranéenne, Vol. 4: 17–26.Google Scholar
Bunn, H.T., Bartram, L., and Kroll, E., 1988. “Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processing.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7: 412–457.Google Scholar
Burgat, F., 1996. Animal, mon prochain. Paris.Google Scholar
Carpenter, C.R., 1965. “The howler of Barro Colorado Island,” in de Vore, I., ed., Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes. New York. Pp. 250–291.Google Scholar
Chance, M., 1974. “Une dimension absente en biologie: le comportement,” in Morin, E., Piattelli-Palmarini, M., eds., L'unité de I'Homme. I. Le primate et l'homme, “Colloque de la Fondation Royaumont.” Paris. Pp. 218–227.Google Scholar
Chavaillon, J., 1986. “Premiers outils et vie en société,” in Sakka, M., ed., Définition et origines de l'homme. Paris. Pp. 309–315.Google Scholar
Chavaillon, J., 1996. L'âge d or de I'humanité. Chroniques du paléolithique. Paris.Google Scholar
Coppens, Y. 1994, “East side story: the origin of humankind.” Scientific American 270 (5): pp. 62–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Dahlberg, F., ed.,1981. Woman the Gatherer. New-Haven.Google Scholar
de Vore, I., Washburn, L.S., 1963. “Baboon ecology and human evolution,” in Clark-Howell, F. and Bourlière, F., eds., African Ecology and Human Evolution. New-York. Pp. 335–367.Google Scholar
de Waal, F., 1992. De la Reconciliation chez les primates, Paris.Google Scholar
de Waal, F., 1996. “L'activité sexuelle pacificatrice des bonobos.” Pour la Science, 211, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar
de Waal, F., 1997. Le bon singe. Les bases naturelles de la morale. Paris.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., 1989. Human Ethology. New-York.Google Scholar
Foley, R., 1991. “Introduction: investigating the origins of human behaviour,” in Foley, R. A., ed., The Origins of Human Behaviour, “One world archaeology.” London. Pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Foley, R., and Lee, P., 1989. “Finite social space, evolutionary pathways, and reconstructing hominid behavior.” Science 243, pp. 901–906.Google ScholarPubMed
Gardner, R.A., and Gardner, T., 1969. “Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee.” Science 165, pp. 664–672.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghiglieri, M., 1987. “Sociobiology of the great apes and the hominid ancestors.” Journal of Human Evolution 16, pp. 319–358.Google Scholar
Ghiglieri, M., 1989. “Hominoid sociobiology and Hominid social evolution,” in Heltine, P. G. and Marquardt, L. A., eds., Understanding Chimpanzees. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pp. 370–379.Google Scholar
Goodall, J., and Hamburg, D.A., 1975. “Chimpanzee behavior as a model for the behavior of early man,” American Handbook of Psychiatry, vol.6., in Hamburg, D. A. and Brodie, K. H., eds., New Psychiatric Frontiers. New York. Pp. 14–43.Google Scholar
Hewes, G., 1973. “Primate communication and the gestural origin of language.” Current Anthropology 14, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B., 1984. Des guenons et des femmes. Essai de sociobiologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Imanishi, K., 1961. “The origins of human family: a primatological approach.” Japanese Journal of Ethnology 25, pp. 110–130.Google Scholar
Isaac, G., 1978. “Le Partage de la nourriture chez les hominides.” Pour la Science 8, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Isaac, G., 1981. “Stone age visiting cards: approaches to the study of early land-use patterns,” in Hodder, I., Isaac, G., and Hammond, N., eds., Patterns of the Past. Studies in Honor of D. Clarke. Cambridge. Pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
Isaac, G., 1984. “The Archaeology of human origins: studies of the lower Pleistocene in east Africa, 1971-1981,” in Wendorf, F. and Close, A. E., eds., Advances in World Archaeology New-York. Vol. 3, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
Isaac, G., 1989. “Cutting and carying: archaeological emergence of the genus Homo,” in Durant, J. R., ed., Human origins. Oxford. Pp. 106–122.Google Scholar
Johanson, D., and White, T., 1979. “A systematic assessment of early african hominids.” Science 203, pp. 321–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Joulian, F., 1993. “Chasse, charognage et hominization.” Prehistoire et Anthropologie Méditerranéenne, v. 2: pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
Joulian, F., 1995a. “‘Human and non-human primates,' des limites de genre bien problématiques en préhistoire“. Préhistoire et Anthropologie Méditerranéenne, Vol. 4: pp. 5–15.Google Scholar
Joulian, F., 1995b, “Mise en evidence de différences traditionnelles dans le cassage des noix chez les chimpanzés (Pan troglodytes) de la Côte d'Ivoire, implications paléoanthropologiques.” Journal des Africanistes 65 (2): pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
Joulian, F., 1996. “Comparing chimpanzee and early hominid techniques: some contributions to cultural and cognitive questions,” in Mellars, P. A. and Gibson, K. R., eds., Modelling the Early Human Mind. Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Pp.173–189.Google Scholar
Joulian, F., forthcoming, “Techniques du corps et actions élémentaires sur la matière chez les primates et les premiers hominidés,” in Sigaut, F. and Lewis, G., eds., Culture et usages du corps. Colloque de la Fondation Fyssen.Google Scholar
Kawamura, , 1959. “ The process of sub-culture propagation among Japanese macaques.” Primates 2: pp. 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, A. and de Kooij, M., 1963. “Protohominid behavior in primates.” Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 10: pp. 61–88.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J., 1968. “On the evolution of tool-using behaviour.” American Anthropology 70: pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Landau, M., 1991. Narratives of Human Evolution. New Haven.Google Scholar
Leakey, M., C. S. Feibel, I. McDougall, and Walker, A., 1995. “New four million year old hominid species from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya.” Nature 376: pp. 565–571.Google ScholarPubMed
Leakey, R., and Lewis, R., 1985. Les origines de l'homme. Paris.Google Scholar
Lee, P., 1988, “Comparative ethological approaches in modelling hominid behaviour.” Ossa 14: pp. 113–126Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1957, Technique et société chez l'animal et chez l'homme. Originalité biologique de l'Homme. Paris, Fayard. coll. “Recherches et débats,” no.18, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1964/65, Le Geste et la parole, vols. 1 and 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K., 1981, L'homme dans le Fleuve du vivant. Paris.Google Scholar
Matsuzawa, Y., 1994, “Field experiments on use of stone tools by chimpanzees in the wild,” in Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M., and Heltne, P. G., eds., Chimpanzee Cultures. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pp. 351–370.Google Scholar
McGrew, W.C., 1981, “The female chimpanzee as a human evolutionary prototype,” in Dahlberg, F., ed., Woman the Gatherer. New Haven.Google Scholar
McGrew, W.C., 1992, Chimpanzee Material Culture. Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moore, J., 1996, “Savanna chimpanzees, referential models and the last common ancestor,” in McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L., and Nishida, T., eds., Great Apes Societies. Cambridge. Pp. 275–292.Google Scholar
Morin, E., 1973, Le paradigme perdu: la nature humaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., 1972, La société contre nature. Paris.Google Scholar
Oakley, K., 1959, Man the Tool-maker. Chicago.Google Scholar
Parker, S., and Gibson, K., 1977, “Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes.” Journal of Human Evolution 6: pp. 623–641.Google Scholar
Parker, S., and Gibson, K., 1979, “A model of the evolution of language and intelligence in early hominids.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: pp. 367–407.Google Scholar
Picq, P., 1994, “The socioecology of Australipithecus afarensis: an attempt at reconstruction,” in Thierry, B., Anderson, J., Roeder, J.-J., and Herrenschmmidt, N., eds., Current Primatology I. Strasbourg. Pp. 175–186.Google Scholar
Pigeot, N., 1991, “Réflexions sur l'histoire technique de l'homme: de l'évolution cognitive: l'évolution culturelle.” Paléo 3: pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
Premack, D. and Premack, A.J., 1984, L'esprit de Sarah. Paris.Google Scholar
Routhier, P., 1997. “A quoi sert Lucy?" National Hebdo 662: p. 21. Russon, A., forthcoming. “The nature and evolution of intelligence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).” Primates.Google Scholar
Sabater-Pi, J., 1978, El chimpancé y los origenes de la cultura. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, S. and Lewin, R., 1994. Kanzi. The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind. New York.Google Scholar
Sept, J., 1992, “Was there no place like home? A new perspective on early hominid sites from the mapping of chimpanzees' nests.”Current Anthropology 33 (2): pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
Stoczkowski, W., 1995, “Le Bipède et sa science. Histoire d'une structure de la pensée naturaliste.” Gradhiva 17: pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
Strum, S. and Mitchell, W., 1987. “Baboon model and muddles,” in Kinzey, W. G., ed., The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models. Albany. Pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Susman, R., 1991. “Who made the Oldowan tools? Fossil evidence for tool behavior in Plio-Pleistocene hominids.” Journal of Anthropological Research 47 2: pp. 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, N.M., 1981. On Becoming Human. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tanner, N.M., 1987. “The Chimpanzee model revisited and the gathering hypothesis,” in Kinzey, W. G., ed., The Evoliction of Hacman Behavior: Primate Models. New York. Pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1956. La Place de I homme dans la nature: le groupe zoologique humain. Paris.Google Scholar
Teleki, G., 1975. “Primate subsistence patterns: collector-predators and gatherer-hunters.” Joicrnal of Human Evolution 4: pp. 125–184.Google Scholar
Tasello, M., 1990. “Cultural transmission in the tool and communicatory signaling of chimpanzees,” in Parker, S. and Gibson, K., eds., Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes. Comparative Developmental Perspectives. New York. Pp. 274–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., and de Vore, I., 1987. “The reconstruction of hominid behavioural evolution through strategic modeling,” in Kinzey, W. G., ed., Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models. Albany. Pp. 183–238.Google Scholar
Toth, N., et al., 1993. “Pan the tool-maker: investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus).” Journal of Archaeological Science 20: pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
Vauclair, J., 1992. L'lntelligence de l'anirnal. Paris.Google Scholar
White, T.D., Suwa, G., and Asfaw, B., 1994. “Aicstralopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia.” Nature 371: pp. 306–312.Google ScholarPubMed
Wrangham, R., 1987. “The Significance of African apes for reconstructing human social evolution,” in Kinzey, W. G., ed., The Evolution of Human Behavior: Prirnate Models. New York. Pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Wynn, T., and McGrew, W.C., 1989. “An Ape's view of the Oldowan.” Man 24: pp. 383–398.Google Scholar
Zihlman, et al., 1978. “Pygmy chimpanzee as a possible prototype for the common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees and gorillas.” Nature 275: pp. 744–746, 20.Google ScholarPubMed