Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-vrt8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:04:28.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Durkheim, Wittgenstein and the Norms of Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Razmig Keucheyan
Razmig Keucheyan*
Affiliation:
Université de Paris-IV
*
Razmig Keucheyan, Maison de la recherche de Paris 4, ISHA, 28 rue Serpente, 75006 Paris Email: rkeucheyan@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In their respective fields of philosophy and sociology, Ludwig Wittgenstein and E´mile Durkheim are known for having associated two types of norms usually considered to be distinct: social norms and cognitive norms. They shared the same idea that the rules which govern the activity of the mind – for examples the laws of logic – are fundamentally linked to those which subtend social activity. For Wittgenstein and Durkheim, cognitive norms are thus a type of social norm.

The objective of this article is to compare the way in which Wittgenstein and Durkheim thematise the relationship between social norms and cognitive norms. It begins by clarifying the author’s understanding of ‘‘cognitive norms’’. It then presents Durkheim’s and Wittgenstein’s analyses of these norms, and it finally attempts to define some of the similarities and differences existing between their approaches to this problem.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 4: Philosophical Reflections Across Cultures , November 2010 , pp. 63 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Gordon, Hacker, Peter (1984) Scepticism, Rules and Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1993) “The Individual Strikes Back”, in Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David (1982) “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 13(4): 267–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert (1994) Making it Explicit! Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Comment. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, William (1999) The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Demeulenaere, Pierre (2000) “Individualism and Holism: New Controversies in Philosophy of Social Sciences”, Mind and Society, 2(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile (1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Pascal (2001) “The Norms of the Mental: Are They Social?”, Mind and Society, 3: 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Pascal, Mulligan, Kevin (2003) “Normes éthiques et normes cognitives”, Cités, 5 :171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob (1999) Écrits posthumes. Nmes: Jacqueline Chambon.Google Scholar
Homans, George (1961) Social Behaviour: its Elementary Forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Keucheyan, Razmig (2003) “Sens commun et réalité sociale : perspectives philosophiques et sociologiques” Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, 42(2) : 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1996) Règles et langage privé. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1972) Émile Durkheim. His Life and Work, a Historical and Critical Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Monk, Ray (1991) Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter (2001) “Norms” in International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 16. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2003) The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tooby, John, Cosmides, Leda (1992) “The Psychological Foundation of Culture” in Jerome, Barkow, Cosmides, Leda, John, Tooby (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1979) Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough. Atlantic Heights, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1983) Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar