Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:41:59.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Culture: Pragmatic and Philosophical Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Marcelo Dascal
Marcelo Dascal*
Affiliation:
University of Tel Aviv
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the coming decades, the so-called telematic technologies are destined to grow more and more encompassing in scale and the repercussions they will have on our professional and personal lives will become ever more accentuated. The transformations resulting from the digitization of data have already profoundly modified a great many of the activities of human life and exercise significant influence on the way we design, draw up, store and send documents, as well as on the means used for locating information in libraries, databases and on the net. These changes are transforming the nature of international communication and are modifying the way in which we carry out research, engage in study, keep our accounts, plan our travel, do our shopping, look after our health, organize our leisure time, undertake wars and so on. The time is not far off when miniaturized digital systems will be installed everywhere - in our homes and offices, in the car, in our pockets or even embedded within the bodies of each one of us. They will help us to keep control over every aspect of our lives and will efficiently and effectively carry out multiple tasks which today we have to devote precious time to. As a consequence, our ways of acting and thinking will be transformed. These new winds of change, which are blowing strongly, are giving birth to a new culture to which the name ‘digital culture’ has been given. It is timely that a study should be made of the different aspects and consequences of this culture, but that this study should not be just undertaken from the point of view of the simple user who quickly embraces the latest successful innovation, in reaction essentially to market forces. The major challenge for this culture resides not so much in the development of even more tiny microchips, faster processors or more refined software, but in the honing of conceptual instruments which will give us the ability to analyse and evaluate the radical changes that this revolution is bringing about and which it will continue to provoke in all of our lives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , August 2006 , pp. 23 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cassell, J., et al. (2000) Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosland, M. P. (1978) Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (1978) La sémiologie de Leibniz [The Semiology of Leibniz]. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (1987) Leibniz. Language, Signs and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M. (2002) ‘Leibniz y las tecnologías cognitivas’, in Andrieu, A., Echeverría, J., and Roldan, C. (eds), Ciencia, Tecnología y Bien Común: La Actualidad de Leibniz, pp. 359–88. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (2003) Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. (1966) Œuvres [Works], edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dresner, E. and Dascal, M. (2001) ‘Semantics, Pragmatics and the Digital Information Age’. Studies in Communication Sciences 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1981) Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foner, L. N. (2000) ‘Are we having fun yet? Using social agents in social domains’, in Dautenhaha, K. (ed.), Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, pp. 323–348. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Th. (1962) Leviathan, edited by Plamenatz, John. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1999) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe [Collected Writings and Letters], 6th series, volume 4. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Maudlin, L. (1994) ‘Chatterbots, tinyMUDS and the Turing Test’, in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. (1938) ‘Foundations of the Theory of Signs’, in Neurath, O., Carnap, R. and Morris, C. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1980) ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3: 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1984) Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2002) Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Haakonssen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1996) ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, in Geirsson, H. and Losonsky, M. (eds), Readings in Language and Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ‘ELIZA - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine’, Communications of the Association Computing Machinery 9: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Design: A New Foundation for Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar