No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Biological Aspects of the Relationships Between Music and Language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
Extract
Unesco and the International Council of Music have begun work on a musicological project of considerable extent, since it is a universal history of music in ten volumes. At present, the provisional title is Music as a Language of Man: A World History of Music.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1983 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)
References
Beecher, M.D., Petersen, M.R., Zoloth, S.R., Moddy, D.B., Stebbins, T.C., “Perception of Conspecific Vocalization by Japanese Macaques. Evidence for Selective Attention and Neural Lateralization,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 1979, Vol. 16, nos. 5-6, p. 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J.E., Gordon, H.W., “Musical Tests for Functional Lateralization with Intracarotid Amobarbital,” Nature, 1971, Vol. 230, p. 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F.H.C., “Thinking about the Brain,” Sci. American, 1979, Vol. 241, no 3, p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J.E., Rosner, B.J., “Categories and Boundaries in Speech and Music,” Percept. Psychophys., 1974, Vol. 16, p. 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T., The Biology of Ultimate Concern, New York, New American Library, 1967.Google Scholar
Von Economo, C., “Über Progressive Cerebration,” Kl. Wochenschrift, Vienna, 1951, no. 44, p. 597.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J.L., “A Difference Limen for Vowel Formant Frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1955, no. 27, p. 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, J.P., “Field and Laboratory Studies of the Vocalizations of Talopoin Monkeys, Miopithecus talopoin,” Behavior, 1974, no. 41, p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N., “The Anatomical Basis of Hemispheric Differentiation,” Experimental Studies of Hemisphere Function in the Human Brain, ed. Dimond-Baumont, , 1973.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N., “Anatomical Asymmetry as the Basis for Cerebral Dominance,” Fed. Proc., 1978, 37 (9), p. 2263.Google ScholarPubMed
Imberty, M., (a) “Acculturation Tonale and structuration perceptive du temps musical chez l'enfant"; (b) “Peut-on parler de compétence musicale à propos de la structuration du temps musical chez l'enfant?,” Basic Musical Functions and Musical Ability, papers given at a seminar arranged by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, ed. Astrand, Hans, 1981, publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, no. 32, p. 131.Google Scholar
Kimura, D., “Functional Asymmetry of the Brain in Dichotic Listening,” Cortex, 1967, 3, p. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., “Speech Perception in Early Infancy: Perceptual Constancy for the Vowel Categories /a/ and /o/,” J. Accoust. Soc. Amer., 1977, 61, suppl. 1, S39 (A), p. 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., “Models and Mechanisms in Speech Perception. Species Comparisons Provide Further Contributions,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 1979, Vol. 16, no. 5–6.Google Scholar
Levy, J., Nebes, R.D., Sperry, R.W., “Expressive Language in the Surgically Separated Minor Hemisphere,” Cortex, 1971, Vol. 7, p. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libermann, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Harris, K.S., Macneilage, P., “A Motor Theory of Speech Perception,” Proc. Speech Communication Seminar, Stockholm, 1962.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Ph., On the Origin of Language. An Introduction to the Evolution of Human Speech, London-New York, MacMillan, 1975.Google Scholar
Monrad-Krohn, G.H., “The Third Element of Speech; Prosody and its Disorders,” Problems of Dynamic Neurol, Jerusalem, 1963, p. 101.Google Scholar
Nicholis, G., Prigogine, J., “Fluctuation in Non-Equilibrium Systems,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1971, 68, p. 2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D.B., “On the Perception of Speech Sounds as Biologically Significant Signals,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 1979, Vol. 16, no. 5–6, p. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, J., “Order Through Fluctuations: Self-Organizations and Social System,” Evolution and Consciousness, ed. Jantsch, E., Waddington, C.H., London-Amsterdam, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., 1976, p. 93.Google Scholar
Sinz, R., Chronopsychophysiologie, Chronobiologie und Chronomedizin, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, R.W., “Forebrain Commissurotomy and Conscious Awareness,” J. Med. and Phil., 1977, Vol. 2, no. 2, p. 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K.N., “The Quantal Nature of Speech: Evidence from Articulatory-Acoustic Data,” Human Communication: A Unified View, ed. Denes, David Jr., New York, McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
Ustvedt, H.J., “Über die Untersuchung der musikalischen Funktionen bei Patienten mit Gehirnleiden, besonders bei Patienten mit Aphasie,” Acta Med. Scan., Suppl. LXXXVI, Stockholm -Helsinki.Google Scholar
Wallin, N.L., “Some Notes on the Neurobiological and Genetic Aspects and Musical Ability,” papers given at a seminar arranged by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, ed. Hans Astrand, publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 1981, 32, p. 179.Google Scholar
Wallin, N.L., “Den musikaliska hjärnan. En kritisk essä om musik och perception i biologisk belysning,” with an English summary, KUNGL, Musikaliska Akademiens Skriftserie, 3,” Skrifter frän musikvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborg, 6, Stockholm, 1982.Google Scholar
Zaidel, E., “Language, Dichotic Listening and the Disconnected Hemispheres,” Brain Inform. Serv. Conference Report, 42, Los Angeles, 1976, p. 103.Google Scholar
Zaidel, E., “Lexical Organization in the Right Hemisphere,” Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience, ed. P.A. Buser, A. Rougel-Buser, 1977, Inserm. Symposium, 6, 1978.Google Scholar
Zoloth, S., Green, S., “Monkey Vocalization and Human Speech: Parallels in Perception?,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 1979, Vol. 16, no. 5-6, p. 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar