Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T01:15:08.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biogenesis and Anthropogenesis: How Recurrent, How Unique?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Extract

The fall of the nineteenth century abounded in discoveries of natural laws, that is, strict and unequivocal rules of the development of life. These laws stated for example that ontogeny of individuals repeats, or recapitulates, phylogeny of the species; that big and specialized forms originate in evolution from small and unspecialized ones, while the reverse is not true; that endothermic animals are larger-sized and more compact in cool than in warm climates, and so on. Louis Dollo, a Belgian palaeontologist, proposed the so-called law of irreversibility of evolution which stated that an organic structure lost in evolution cannot reappear with all the peculiarities of its design. This law seems indeed to be true but not particularly original. It was Heraclitus who first observed that one could not enter the same river twice. Dollo's law says essentially the same thing. The flow of evolutionary events combines so many processes in so many ways that past evolutionary events cannot recur exactly. “What is done, is done forever”. Time itself introduces asymmetry into the evolutionary process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gould, S.J., 1970, ”Dollo on Dollo's Law: Irreversibility and the Status of Evolutionary Laws”, J. Hist. Biology, 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowler, P.J., 1983, The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A.R., 1889, Darwinism: an Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mosimann, J., and Martin, P., 1975, “Simulating Overkill by Paleoindians“ American Scientist, 63.Google Scholar
MARTIN, P., and WRIGHT, H.E., eds., 1967, Pleistocene Extinctions. The Search for a Cause, New Haven and London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schopf, T.J.M., 1979, ”Evolving. Paleontological views on deterministic and stochastic approaches”, Paleobiology, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar