Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:43:11.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond the Frame of Practical Reason: The Indian Evidence Act and Its Performative Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Ranabir Samaddar*
Affiliation:
Calcutta Research Group, India
*
Ranabir Samaddar, Calcutta Research Group, FE 390 (G.F), Salt Lake City, Kolkata 700106, India. Email: ranabir@mcrg.ac.in

Abstract

This article is about the Indian Evidence Act. It explains how evidence is the script that carries law's unconscious. One one hand, evidence is the site of reason, and on the other hand it is the performative site of the unconscious. The operation of the Evidence Act requires a court, arguments, ways of producing evidence, counter-arguments, scrutiny of the nature of the evidence submitted, and finally the disputation around what constitutes an evidence – and then the judgement. This article argues, through a brief presentation of the history of the Act, how law in this way combines the normative and the performative – science of inquiry and the unpredictable script of the outcome, procedure and the spectacle built around elements such as live deposition and the hermeneutic power of the image, rational considerations and emotion, virtuality and the event, serious business in the court and the element of drama. The article suggests (with a bit of irony) the injunction that to see what law is and how it functions we can go to the cinema, and to see what cinema is we can go to the court.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almog, S, Reichman, A (2004) Casablanca: judgment and dynamic enclaves in law and cinema. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 42(2): 201227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S (2011) The mysterious alien – Indian street jugglers in Victorian London. Economic and Political Weekly xlvi(14): 5965.Google Scholar
Banerjee, TK (1963) Background to Indian Criminal Law. Calcutta: R. Cambray & Co.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P (2002) A Princely Impostor? The Kumar of Bhawal and the Secret History of Indian Nationalism. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Cole, SA (2001) Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, SA (2004) Fingerprint identification and the criminal justice system – historical lessons for the DNA debate. In Lazer, D (ed) DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.6390.Google Scholar
Das, S, Chattopadhyay, B (1990) Rural crime in police perceptions – a case study of the village crime notebooks of Gazole Police Station in Bengal. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Golden Jubilee Session. Gorakhpur: Gorakhpur University, pp.647662.Google Scholar
Evans, C (2003) A Question of Evidence. The Casebook of Great Forensic Controversies, from Napoleon to O. J. Simpson. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Foucault, M [Maurice Florence] (1984) Foucault. In Huisman, D (ed) Dictionnaire des philosophes. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hay, D (1975) Property, Authority and the Criminal Law. In Hay, D, Linebaugh, P, Thompson, EP, Albion's Fatal Tree. London: Allen Lane, pp.3863.Google Scholar
Holmes, S (1995) Passions and Constraints. On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jarasandha (1967) Louhakapat. Calcutta: Mitra & Ghosh.Google Scholar
Kannabiran, KG (2003) Malimuth Committee. Safeguard the rights of the accused. PUCL Bull., www.pucl.org/Topics/Law/2003/malimath.htm.Google Scholar
Kolsky, E (2010) Colonial Justice in British India. White Violence and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lal, V (1995) Criminality and colonial anthropology. Introduction to Rai Bahadur M. Pauparao Naidu, The History of Railway Thieves [1915], with Illustrations and Hints on Detection. Gurgaon: Vintage Press, pp.i–xxvii.Google Scholar
Morgan, G, Rushton, P (2005) Visible bodies. power, subordination, and identity in the eighteenth century Atlantic world. Journal of Social History 39(1): 3964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Papke D (2001) Law, cinema, and ideology. Hollywood legal films of the 1950s. UCLA Law Review 48(6): 14731493.Google Scholar
Reichman, A (2007) The production of law (and cinema). bepress Legal Series, http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1997.Google Scholar
Samanta, AK, ed (1995) Terrorism in Bengal. A Collection of Documents, 6 vols. Calcutta: Government of West Bengal.Google Scholar
Samaddar, R (1998) Memory, Identity, Power. Politics in the Jungle Mahals, 1890–1950. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Samaddar, R (2002a) Colonial Constitutionalism. Identity, Culture and Politics 3(1): 135; http://calternatives.org/resource/pdf/Colonial%20Constitutionalism.pdf.Google Scholar
Samaddar, R (2002b) The destiny of a translated constitutional culture. Transeuropeennes 22: 7588.Google Scholar
Samaddar, R (2008) Crimes, Passion, and Detachment. Colonial Foundations of Rule of Law. In Kannabiran, K, Singh, R (eds) Challenging the Rule(s) of Law. Colonialism, Criminology and Human Rights in India. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 355381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaddar, R (2010) Emergence of the Political Subject. New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, UK (2007) The State, Democracy, and Anti-Terror Laws in India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Singha, R (2000) A Despotism of Law – Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tendulkar, V (1978) Silence! The Court is in Session, trans. Adarkar, Priya. Kolkata: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, J, Ali, SA (2001) Laws of Evidence [1898], vol. 1, ed. Rao, S. V. Joga. New Delhi: Butterworths.Google Scholar