Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:05:25.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traces of Objectivity: Causality and Probabilities in Quantum Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Michel Bitbol
Michel Bitbol*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
*
Michel Bitbol, CNRS, Archives Husserl, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45, rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. Email: michel.bitbol@ens.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unlike a widespread opinion, the constitution of objectivity (in Kant’s sense) does not require a strict, determinist, application of the category of causality to phenomena manifested in space-time. Some stochastic theories, using probabilities at their fundamental level, are just as able to constitute a domain of objects as determinist theories. In this paper, the conditions to be fulfilled for numbers to be considered as probabilities of intrinsic properties of an object of experience are displayed. These conditions, that synthesize George Boole’s relations and John Bell’s inequalities, are discussed in detail. Where they are not fulfilled, they make us suspect that it is impossible to achieve the detachment of an object from the instruments that give access to it.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 2011 , pp. 30 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharonov, Y, Anandan, J, Vaidman, L (1993) ‘Meaning of the Wave Function’, Physical Review, A47: 4616–4626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , On the Soul http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html.Google Scholar
Aspect, A, Dalibard, J, Roger, G (1982) ‘Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49: 1804–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitbol, M (1997) Mécanique quantique, une introduction philosophique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bitbol, M (1998) ‘Some Steps Towards a Transcendental Deduction of Quantum Mechanics’, Philosophia naturalis, 35: 253–280.Google Scholar
Bohm, D, Hiley, B J (1993) The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bohr, N (1961) Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: Science Editions Inc.Google Scholar
Boole, G (1952) ‘On The Theory of Probabilities’, in id., Studies in Logic and Probability. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Boole, G (1958) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Born, M (1983) ‘On the Quantum Mechanics of Collisions’, in Wheeler, J A, Zurek, W H (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 52–55. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bouwmester, D, Pan, Jian-Wei, Daniell, M, Weinfurter, H, Zeilinger, A (1999) ‘Observation of 3-Photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82: 1345–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, G G (1994) ‘Kant and the Quantum Theory’, in Parrini, P (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 131–155. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E (1956) Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chiao, R Y, Garrison, J (1999) ‘Réalité ou localité: laquelle faut-il abandonner?’ (unpublished paper from a conference at the UIP, Paris).Google Scholar
Chiao, R Y, Kwiat, P G, Steinberg, A M (1995) ‘Quantum Non-Locality in 2-Photons Experiments at Berkeley’, Quantum and Semi-Classical Optics, 7: 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destouches-Février, P (1951) La structure des théories physiques. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Dickson, M (1995) ‘An Empirical Reply to Empiricism: Protective Measurement Opens the Door for Quantum Realism’, Philosophy of Science, 62: 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A (1971) ‘Quantum Mechanics and Reality’, in Einstein, A, Born, M, The Born-Einstein Letters. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, B (1975) ‘Use of Inequalities for the Experimental Test of a General Conception of the Foundation of Microphysics i’, Phys. Rev. D 11: 1424–1435.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, B (1978) ‘Use of Inequalities for the Experimental Test of a General Conception of the Foundation of Microphysics ii’, Phys. Rev. D 18: 349–378.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, B (1979) À la recherche du réel. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, B (1984) ‘Non-Separability and the Tentative Descriptions of Reality’, Physics Reports, 110: 201–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Espagnat, B (1990) ‘Towards a separable empirical reality’, Foundations of Physics, 20: 1147–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Février, P (1956) L’interprétation physique de la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M (1995) The Quark and Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Haroche, S, Brune, M, Raimond, J M (1997) ‘Reversible Decoherence of a Mesoscopic Superposition of Field States’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79: 1964–1967.Google Scholar
Haroche, S, Raimond, J M, Brune, M (1997) ‘Le chat de Schrödinger se prête à l’expérience’, La Recherche, 301, septembre.Google Scholar
Heelan, P (1970) ‘Complementarity, Context-Dependence, and Quantum Logic’, Foundations of Physics, 1(2): 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W (1930) The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory. New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W (1983) ‘The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics’, in Wheeler, J A, Zurek, W H (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 62–84. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W (2002) Der Teil und das Ganze. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Hermann, G (1996) Les fondements philosophiques de la mécanique quantique, prés. par Soler, L. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Hughes, R I G (1989) The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jammer, M (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1953) Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1964) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1971) ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose’, in Reiss, Hans (ed.), Kant's Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kistler, M (1999) Causalité et lois de la nature. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Kojève, A (1990) L’idée du déterminisme dans la physique classique et dans la physique moderne. Paris: Le livre de poche.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A N (1950) Foundations of the Theory of Probability. New York: Chelsea Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Leite-Lopes, J, Escoubès, B (1995) Sources et évolution de la physique quantique, Sources et évolution de la mécanique quantique. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Lewis, D (1986) ‘Causation’, in id., Philosophical Papers II. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Mittelstaedt, P (1994) ‘The Constitution of Objects in Kant's Philosophy and in Modern Physics’, in Parrini, P (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 115–129. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelstaedt, P (1998) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Mugur-Schächter, M (1997) ‘Mécanique quantique, réel et sens’, in Bitbol, M, Laugier, S (éds), Physique et réalité, un débat avec Bernard d’Espagnat, pp. 106–155. Paris: Frontières-Diderot.Google Scholar
Omnès, R (1999) Quantum Philosophy. Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J (1970) Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitowsky, I (1994) ‘George Boole's “Conditions of Possible Experience” and the Quantum Puzzle’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(1): 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K (1995) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proust, J (1997) Comment l’esprit vient aux bêtes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1979) Philosophical Papers: II (1925–1936). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E (1995) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, ed. Bitbol, M. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
Selleri, F (1994) Le grand débat de la théorie quantique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Smith, B C (1998) On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P (1966) The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
von Wright, G H (1974) Causality and Determinism. New York: Columbia UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurek, W H (1982) ‘Environment-Induced Superselection Rules’, Physical Review, D26: 1862–1880.Google Scholar