Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:15:42.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of the Archaeologist in Present-Day Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

François Djindjian
François Djindjian*
Affiliation:
University of Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne and CNRS
*
François Djindjian, 8 rue Scheffer, 75016 Paris, France Email: francois.djindjian@wanadoo.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper is aimed to reveal the useful role that the archaeologist, evading from the ivory tower of his erudition of the societies of the past, may play for the change of the societies in the future. From two examples chosen in the XIX° century, we are focalizing on the very deep impact the archaeology may have in the society at a regional scale (the museum of Lubny in Ukraine) and at a worldwide scale (the Universal Exhibitions in Paris) for the evolution of the societies. Resulting from crisis due to internal mechanisms specific to our operation, the contemporary societies may collapse like the societies of the past. Such mechanisms have a systemic and non historical nature, which are involving us to discover the main processes, responsible of collapses. Then, the archaeologist, like the climatologist, may operate the knowledge of the past to forecast the happy or unhappy evolutions of the future. The archaeologist, servicing the contemporaneous society, may be useful, not only in discovering the remains of the past but also in making the inventory of the contemporary cultures as in forecasting the evolutions of the societies.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 58 , Issue 1-2: The Humanities Today , May 2011 , pp. 53 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diamond, J (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Djindjian, F (1991) Méthodes pour l’archéologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Doran, J E (1990) “Computer-based Simulation and Formal Modelling in Archaeology: A Review”, in Voorrips, A (ed.), Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology : A Flexible Framework, pp. 93–114. Bonn: Holos.Google Scholar
Doran, J E, Palmer, M (1995) “The EOS Project: Integrating Two Models of Palaeolithic Social Change”, in Gilbert, N, Conte, R (eds), Artificial Societies, pp. 103–125. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Ferber, J (1995) Les Systèmes multi-agents: Vers une intelligence collective. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007) Synthèse du quatrième rapport (AR4) des groupes I, II et III du GIEC. Internet site www.ipcc.ch.Google Scholar
Le Roy Ladurie, E (2004) Histoire humaine et comparée du climat: Canicules et glaciers, XIII°–XVIII° siècles. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
de Mortillet, G (1867) Promenades préhistoriques à l’Exposition universelle. Paris: Reinwald.Google Scholar
de Mortillet, A (1900) “Exposition Universelle de 1900: Catalogue de l’exposition de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris”, Bulletins de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris, 1(1): 254–294. Paris: Reinwald.Google Scholar
Müller-Schessel, N (2001) “Fair Prehistory: Archaeological Exhibits at French Expositions Universelles”, Antiquity, 75: 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C, James, S, Fish, P, Rogers, J D (2004) The Archaeology of Global Change : The Impacts of the Humans on their Environment. Washington: Smithsonians Books.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, Cooke, K L (eds) (1979) Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change. New York, San Francisco, and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostovtseff, M I (1998) Histoire économique et sociale de l’empire romain. Laffont: Bouquins.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A (1993) La conquête du passé: Aux origines de l’archéologie. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Suprunenko, O B (2000) Археологiя в дiяльностi першого приватного музею Украiни: Лубенський музей К.М. Скаржинськоi. Kiev-Poltava: Кол.авт. НАН Украiни. Iнститут археологii.Google Scholar
Tainter, J (1988) The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tainter, J (2006)“ Archaeology of Overshoot and Collapse”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, A (1980) On Democracy, Revolution and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woolridge, M (2002) An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N, Cowgill, G (1988) The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilisations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar