No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Priori, Objectivity, and Judgement Crossing the Paths of Kantianism, Phenomenology and Neo-Empiricism: A Tribute to Giulio Preti
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0392192100300682/resource/name/firstPage-S0392192100300682a.jpg)
- Type
- Tribute
- Information
- Diogenes , Volume 61 , Issue 2: Trends and Debates in Contemporary Epistemology , May 2014 , pp. 59 - 72
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2016
References
Carnap, R (1956) Meaning postulates [1952]. In Carnap, R, Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 222–229.Google Scholar
Carnap, R (1961) Der logische Aufbau der Welt * Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie [1928]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D (2006) Hintikka on phenomenology. In Auxier, RE, Hahn, LE (eds) The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 373–387.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1976) Sein und Zeit [1927]. In Gesamtausgabe 2. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann. [English trans. Being and Time by Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: State University of New York Press 1996].Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1979) Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs [1925]. In Gesamtausgabe 20. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1991) Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik [1929]. In Gesamtausgabe 5. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1992) History of the Concept of Time, transl. by Kiesel, Th. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J (2006) Reply to Dagfinn Føllesdal. In Auxier, RE, Hahn, LE (eds) The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 388–391.Google Scholar
Huemer, W (2003) Logical empiricism and phenomenology: Felix Kaufmann. In Stadler, F (ed.) The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism, Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E (1950) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie [1913]. In Husserl, E, Gesammelte Werke, iii. Nijhoff: The Hague.Google Scholar
Husserl, E (1984) Logische Untersuchungen [1900]. In Husserl, E, Gesammelte Werke, XIX-1. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1995) Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können [1783]. In Kants Werke, Akademie Textausgabe, IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, pp. 253–383.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1998) Kritik der reinen Vernuft [1781/1787]. In Kants Werke, Akademie Textausgabe, IV & III. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. [English trans. Critique of Pure Reason, trans., ed. Guyer, P, Wood, AW, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998].Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1940) Phenomenology and logical empiricism. In Farber, M (ed.) Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 124–142.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1941) Strata of experience, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1: 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, F (1978) The Infinite in Mathematics: Logico-Mathematical Writings, ed. by McGuinness, B. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2003) Schlick and Husserl on the essence of knowledge. In Parrini, P, Salmon, M, Salmon, W (eds) Logical Empiricism. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2004) Fenomeno e cosa in sé: tre livelli di impossibilità fenomenologica. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) Fenomenologia applicata. Esempi di analisi descrittiva. Milan: Guerini, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, R (2006a) La nozione fenomenologica di dato. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
Lanfredini, R (ed.) (2006b) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar
Livingston, P (2002) Husserl and Schlick on the logical form of experience, Synthese, 132: 239–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraglia, R (2006) Dove iniziano gli a priori materiali? Schlick, Wittgenstein e le radici di un equivoco. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (1998) Knowledge and Reality. An Essay in Positive Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2002) L’empirismo logico. Aspetti storici e prospettive teoriche. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2006) A priori materiale e forme trascendentali della conoscenza. Alcuni interrogativi epistemologici. In Lanfredini, R (ed.) A priori materiale. Uno studio fenomenologico. Milan: Guerini, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2012) Fenomenologia ed empirismo logico. In Cimino, A, Costa, V (eds) Storia della fenomenologia. Rome: Carocci, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar
Parrini, P (2014) About the parting of the ways: three roads or four? Schlick's reviews for the Viertteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie and Husserl's phenomenology, Philosophical Inquiries, ii(2): 141–177.Google Scholar
Piazza, T (2002) Fenomenologia nell’Aufbau? Carnap, Husserl e la costituzione del mondo. In Lanfredini, R(ed.) Forma e contenuto. Aspetti di teoria della conoscenza, della mente e della morale. Milan: LED, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
Piazza, T (2004) The quest for the synthetic a priori: Husserl's and Schlick's debate revisited. In Chrudzimski, A, Huemer, W (eds) Phenomenology and Analysis. Essays on Central European Philosophy. Heusenstamm: Ontos-Verlag. pp. 233–256.Google Scholar
Preti, G (2002) Écrits philosophiques. Les Lumières du rationalisme italien, Textes choisis et présentés par Scarantino, L. M. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Quine, WVO (1961) Two dogmas of empiricism [1951]. In Quine, WVO, From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, WVO (1977) Truth by convention [1936]. In Quine, WVO, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1969a) Gibt es ein materiales Apriori? [1930]. In Schlick, M, Gesammelte Aufsätze 1926–1936, ed. Waismann, F. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1969b) Form and Content. An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking [1932]. In Schlick, M, Gesammelte Aufsätze 1926–1936, ed. Waismann, F. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, pp. 159–249.Google Scholar
Schlick, M (1979) Philosophical Papers, ed. Mulder, HL, Van de Velde-Schlick, BFB. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shelton, J (1988) Schlick and Husserl on the foundations of phenomenology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48: 557–561.10.2307/2107481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P (1992) Wittgenstein, Schlick and the a priori. In Simons, P, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, F, ed. (1997) Phänomenologie und Logischer Empirismus: Zentenarium Felix Kaufmann. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W (1957) Das Wahrheitsproblem und die Idee der Semantik. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Pitte, M (1984) Schlick's critique of phenomenological propositions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45: 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar