Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:52:22.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle school peer reputation in high-achieving schools: Ramifications for maladjustment versus competence by age 18

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Alexandria S. Curlee ,
Leona S. Aiken  and
Suniya S. Luthar
Alexandria S. Curlee
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Leona S. Aiken
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Suniya S. Luthar*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Suniya S. Luthar, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 950 S. McAllister Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104; E-mail: Suniya.Luthar@asu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an upper-middle class setting, we explored associations between students’ peer reputation in Grades 6 and 7 with adjustment at Grade 12. With a sample of 209 students, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of peer reputation dimensions supported a 4-factor model (i.e., popular, prosocial, aggressive, isolated). Structural equation models were used to examine prospective links between middle school peer reputation and diverse Grade 12 adjustment indices, including academic achievement (Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and grade point average), internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Prosocial reputation was connected to higher academic achievement levels and fewer externalizing symptoms. Both prosocial and isolated reputations were negatively associated with dimensions of substance use, whereas popularity was positively associated. Implications for future research and interventions are discussed.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 683 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by NIH grant DA014385.

We are grateful to the children and families who have participated in this research, and thank Yu Liu, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, for her assistance with the quantitative modeling.

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar
Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., … Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 635–652.Google Scholar
Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (1984). Drug use among young adults: The impacts of role status and social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 629–645.Google Scholar
Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280–305.Google Scholar
Barber, B. L., Stone, M. R., Hunt, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Benefits of activity participation: The roles of identity affirmation and peer group norm sharing. In Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 185–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social preference: Contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 117–144.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Stulp, G., & Ormel, J. (2014). Parental social status and intrasexual competitiveness among adolescents. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 1022–1037.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G., … Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 386–396.Google Scholar
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Wilkinson, J. L., & Beal, S. J. (2011). The longitudinal relationships between rural adolescents’ prosocial behaviors and young adult substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1192–1202.Google Scholar
Casiglia, A. C., LoCoco, A., & Zappulla, C. (1998). Aspects of social reputation and peer relationships in Italian children: A cross-cultural perspective. Developmental Psychology, 34, 723–730.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Wang, L., & Cao, R. (2011). Shyness-sensitivity and unsociability in rural Chinese children: Relations with social, school, and psychological adjustment. Child Development, 82, 1531–1543.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Yang, F., & Wang, L. (2013). Relations between shyness-sensitivity and internalizing problems in Chinese children: Moderating effects of academic achievement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 825–836.Google Scholar
Chung-Hall, J., & Chen, X. (2010). Aggressive and prosocial peer group functioning: Effects on children's social, school, and psychological adjustment. Social Development, 19, 659–680.Google Scholar
Ciciolla, L., Curlee, A. S., Karageorge, J., & Luthar, S. S. (2017). When mothers and fathers are seen as disproportionately valuing achievements: Implications for adjustment among upper-middle class youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1–19.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (Eds). (2011). Popularity in the peer system. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Coley, R. L., Sims, J., Dearing, E., & Spielvogel, B. (2017). Locating economic risks for adolescent mental and behavioral health: Poverty and affluence in families, neighborhoods, and schools. Child Development, 89, 360–369. doi:10.1111/cdev.12771Google Scholar
de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627.Google Scholar
Department of Economic and Community Development, State of Connecticut (2016). Connecticut 2014 income statistics. Retrieved June 4, 2018, from http://www.ct.gov/ecd/cwp/view.asp?a=1106&q=250652Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). The family check-up with high-risk young adolescents: Preventing early-onset substance use by parent monitoring. Behavior Therapy, 34, 553–571. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80035-7Google Scholar
Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency: The collective management of reputation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O'Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39, 992.Google Scholar
Fite, P. J., Colder, C. R., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2007). Pathways from proactive and reactive aggression to substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 355–364.Google Scholar
Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625.Google Scholar
Gest, S. D., Sesma, A. Jr., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (2006). Childhood peer reputation as a predictor of competence and symptoms 10 years later. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 509–526.Google Scholar
Grant, B. F., & Dawson, D. A. (1998). Age of onset of drug use and its association with DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 10, 163–173.Google Scholar
Guyll, M., Madon, S., Spoth, R., & Lannin, D. G. (2014). Popularity as a predictor of early alcohol use and moderator of other risk processes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 919–928.Google Scholar
Hall-Lande, J. A., Eisenberg, M. E., Christenson, S. L., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 265–286.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Jester, J. M., Nigg, J. T., Buu, A., Puttler, L. I., Glass, J. M., Heitzeg, M. M., … Zucker, R. A. (2008). Trajectories of childhood aggression and inattention/hyperactivity: Differential effects on substance abuse in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 1158–1165.Google Scholar
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., & Bachman, J.G. (2005). Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975-2005: Vol. 1. NIH Publication No. 06-5883. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Killeya-Jones, L., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitudinal study. Prevention Science, 8, 11–23.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. A., & Vaquera, E. (2011). Who is really doing it? Peer embeddedness and substance use during adolescence. Sociological Perspectives, 54, 37–58.Google Scholar
Kovacs, M. (1992). Children's Depression Inventory Manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Kwon, K., Lease, A. M., & Hoffman, L. (2012). The impact of clique membership on children's social behavior and status nominations. Social Development, 21, 150–169.Google Scholar
Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533.Google Scholar
López-Romero, L., & Romero, E. (2010). Goals during adolescence and their relationship with antisocial behavior. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 166–177.10.1017/S1138741600003759Google Scholar
López-Romero, L., & Romero, E. (2011). Reputation management of adolescents in relation to antisocial behavior. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 172, 440–446. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2010.549156Google Scholar
Ludwig, K. B., & Pittman, J. F. (1999). Adolescent prosocial values and self-efficacy in relation to delinquency, risky sexual behavior, and drug use. Youth & Society, 30, 461–482.Google Scholar
Lund, T.J., Dearing, E., & Zachrisson, H. D. (2017). Is affluence a risk for adolescents in Norway? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 628–643. doi:10.1111/jora.12304Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S. (1995). Social competence in the school setting: Prospective cross-domain associations among inner-city teens. Child Development, 66, 416–429.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S. (2017). Doing for the greater good: What price, in academe? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1153–1158. DOI 10.1177/1745691617727863Google Scholar
Luthar, S.S. & Barkin, S.H. (2012). Are affluent youth truly “at risk”? Vulnerability and resilience across three diverse samples. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 429–449. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000089Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., Barkin, S. H., & Crossman, E. J. (2013). “I can, therefore I must”: Fragility in the upper-middle classes. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1529–1549.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., & D'Avanzo, K. (1999). Contextual factors in substance use: A study of suburban and inner-city adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 845–867.Google Scholar
Luthar, S.S., & Kumar, N.L. (In press). Youth in high-achieving schools: Challenges to mental health and directions for evidence-based interventions. In Leschied, A. W.,, Saklofske, D. H., and Flett, G. L. (Eds.), Handbook of school-based mental health promotion: An evidence-informed framework. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., Lyman, E. L., & Crossman, E. J. (2014). Resilience and positive psychology. In Lewis, M. & Rudolph, K. D. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (3rd ed.) (pp. 125–140). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581–603.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., Small, P. J., & Ciciolla, L. (2018). Adolescents from upper-middle class communities: Substance misuse and addiction across early adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 30, 1–21.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523–533.Google Scholar
Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74.Google Scholar
Morison, P., & Masten, A. S. (1991). Peer reputation in middle childhood as a predictor of adaptation in adolescence: A seven-year follow-up. Child Development, 62, 991–1007.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Obradović, J., Burt, K. B., & Masten, A. S. (2009). Testing a dual cascade model linking competence and symptoms over 20 years from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 90–102.Google Scholar
Oh, W., Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., Booth-LaForce, C., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Laursen, B. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 553–566.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1983). Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 805–824.Google Scholar
Pitkänen, T., Lyyra, A., & Pulkkinen, L. (2005). Age of onset of drinking and the use of alcohol in adulthood: A follow-up study from age 8-42 for females and males. Addiction, 100, 652–661.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J. (2007). Assessment of adolescents' preference- and reputation-based peer status using sociometric experts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 243–261.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls' externalizing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 103–112.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Guerry, J. D., & Browne, C. B. (2009). Peer reputations and psychological adjustment. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. (pp. 548–567) New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.Google Scholar
Realmuto, G. M., August, G. J., & Hektner, J. M. (2000). Predictive power of peer behavioral assessment for subsequent maladjustment in community samples of disruptive and nondisruptive children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 181–190.Google Scholar
Reef, J., Diamantopoulou, S., van Meurs, I., Verhulst, F. C., & van der Ende, J. (2011). Developmental trajectories of child to adolescent externalizing behavior and adult DSM-IV disorder: Results of a 24-year longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46, 1233–1241.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1985). Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They're cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175–204Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R., Chen, X., Bowker, J., & McDonald, K. L. (2011). Peer relationships in childhood. In Bornstein, M. H. & Lamb, M. E. (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (6th ed.) (pp. 519–570). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Life after high school: Adjustment of popular teens in emerging adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 474–499.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. E., Meisenhelder, J. B., Yusheng, A., & Reed, G. (2003). Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 778–785.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976–2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 883–897.Google Scholar
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524–536.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2000). Income in 1999 by selected household, family, and individual characteristics: 2000 Census. Retrieved June 4, 2018, from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_00_SF4_QTP33&prodType=tableGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222.Google Scholar
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Yang, F., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2014). Relations between aggression and adjustment in Chinese children: Moderating effects of academic achievement. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 656–669.Google Scholar
Yu, C. Y., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Zeller, M., Vannatta, K., Schafer, J., & Noll, R. B. (2003). Behavioral reputation: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 39, 129.Google Scholar