Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:12:37.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Income, neural executive processes, and preschool children's executive control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2016

Erika J. Ruberry
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Liliana J. Lengua*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Leanna Harris Crocker
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Jacqueline Bruce
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
Michaela B. Upshaw
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Jessica A. Sommerville
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Liliana Lengua, Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195; E-mail: liliana@uw.edu.

Abstract

This study aimed to specify the neural mechanisms underlying the link between low household income and diminished executive control in the preschool period. Specifically, we examined whether individual differences in the neural processes associated with executive attention and inhibitory control accounted for income differences observed in performance on a neuropsychological battery of executive control tasks. The study utilized a sample of preschool-aged children (N = 118) whose families represented the full range of income, with 32% of families at/near poverty, 32% lower income, and 36% middle to upper income. Children completed a neuropsychological battery of executive control tasks and then completed two computerized executive control tasks while EEG data were collected. We predicted that differences in the event-related potential (ERP) correlates of executive attention and inhibitory control would account for income differences observed on the executive control battery. Income and ERP measures were related to performance on the executive control battery. However, income was unrelated to ERP measures. The findings suggest that income differences observed in executive control during the preschool period might relate to processes other than executive attention and inhibitory control.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blair, C. (2010). Stress and the development of self-regulation in context. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 181188. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00145.x Google Scholar
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624652. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 Google Scholar
Buss, K. A., Dennis, T. A., Brooker, R. J., & Sippel, L. M. (2011). An ERP study of conflict monitoring in 4-8-year-old children: Associations with temperament. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 131140. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2010.12.003 Google Scholar
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529553. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.529 Google Scholar
Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179193. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.179 Google Scholar
D'Angiulli, A., Herdman, A., Stapells, D., & Hertzman, C. (2008). Children's event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status. Neuropsychology, 22, 293300. http://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.293 Google Scholar
Davis, E. P., Bruce, J., Snyder, K., & Nelson, C. A. (2003). The X-trials: Neural correlates of an inhibitory control task in children and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 432443.Google Scholar
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 921. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135168. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Google Scholar
Dowsett, S. M., & Livesey, D. J. (2000). The development of inhibitory control in preschool children: Effects of “executive skills” training. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 161174. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200003)36:2<161::AID-DEV7>3.0.CO;2-0 3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluğ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9F16. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00235 Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Shepard, S. A., et al. (2004). The relations of effortful control and impulsivity to children's resiliency and adjustment. Child Development, 75, 2546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59, 7792. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.77 Google Scholar
Evans, G. W., & Schamberg, M. A. (2009). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 65456549. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811910106 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340347. http://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886 Google Scholar
Farah, M. J., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., et al. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Research, 1110, 166174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.072 Google Scholar
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152170. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x Google Scholar
Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3.5–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129153. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X Google Scholar
Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 6573. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003 Google Scholar
Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 651659. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2897 Google Scholar
Hackman, D. A., Gallop, R., Evans, G. W., & Farah, M. J. (2015). Socioeconomic status and executive function: Developmental trajectories and mediation. Developmental Science, 18, 686702. http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12246 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233253. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00921.x Google Scholar
Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2010). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 2036. http://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903325691 Google Scholar
Jonkman, L. M. (2006). The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: A go/nogo ERP study. Brain Research, 1097, 181193.Google Scholar
Kerns, K. A., Eso, K., & Thomson, J. (1999). Investigation of a direct intervention for improving attention in young children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16, 273295. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1602_9 Google Scholar
Kishiyama, M. M., Boyce, W. T., Jimenez, A. M., Perry, L. M., & Knight, R. T. (2008). Socioeconomic disparities affect prefrontal function in children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 11061115. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21101 Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., Jacques, T. Y., Koenig, A. L., & Vandegeest, K. A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Development, 67, 490507. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01747.x Google Scholar
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (1998). NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Bush, N. R., Long, A. C., Kovacs, E. A., & Trancik, A. M. (2008). Effortful control as a moderator of the relation between contextual risk factors and growth in adjustment problems. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 509528. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000254 Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Kiff, C., Moran, L., Zalewski, M., Thompson, S., Cortes, R., et al. (2014). Parenting mediates the effects of income and cumulative risk on the development of effortful control. Social Development, 23, 631649.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Moran, L., Zalewski, M., Ruberry, E., Kiff, C., & Thompson, S. (2014). Relations of growth in effortful control to family income, cumulative risk, and adjustment in preschool-age children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 705720. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9941-2 Google Scholar
Li-Grining, C. P. (2007). Effortful control among low-income preschoolers in three cities: Stability, change, and individual differences. Developmental Psychology, 43, 208221. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.208 Google Scholar
Lipina, S. J., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The impact of poverty on the development of brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 238. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00238 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. (2010). ERPLAB. Davis, CA: University of California at Davis, Center for Mind and Brain.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 432440. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01545-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75, 13731386. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00746.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8, 7487. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00394.x Google Scholar
Ponitz, C. E. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141158. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raver, C. C., Blair, C., & Willoughby, M. (2013). Poverty as a predictor of 4-year-olds’ executive function: New perspectives on models of differential susceptibility. Developmental Psychology, 49, 292304. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028343 Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C., Zhai, F., Bub, K., & Pressler, E. (2011). CSRP's impact on low-income preschoolers’ preacademic skills: Self-regulation as a mediating mechanism. Child Development, 82, 362378. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01561.x Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2007). Temperament. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., & Posner, M. I. (2007). Executive attention and effortful control: Linking temperament, brain networks, and genes. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 27.Google Scholar
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2004). Development of the time course for processing conflict: An event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 39. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-39 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978986. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978 Google Scholar
Stevens, C., Lauinger, B., & Neville, H. (2009). Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: An event-related brain potential study. Developmental Science, 12, 634646. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00807.x Google Scholar
Tamm, L., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2002). Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 12311238. http://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiersema, J. R., & Roeyers, H. (2008). ERP correlates of effortful control in children with varying levels of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 327336. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9288-7 Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3, Serial No. 274), 1155.Google Scholar
Zordan, L., Sarlo, M., & Stablum, F. (2008). ERP components activated by the “GO!” and “WITHHOLD!” conflict in the random Sustained Attention to Response Task. Brain and Cognition, 66, 5764. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.005 Google Scholar