Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:53:09.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peasant sexuality in eighteenth-century Hungary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 For the legal history of seigniorial courts see Lajos, Hajdu: Bünlett és bünhödés Magyarországon a XVIII. század utolsó harmadában (Crime and punishment in Hungary in the last three decades of the eighteenth century) (Budapest, 1985)Google Scholar; István, Kállay, Uriszéki biráskodás a XVIll-XIX. században (Seigniorial courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries) (Budapest, 1985)Google Scholar, the two authors having very different ideas about this subject. The statements of Endre Varga in the introduction to Uriszék. XVI-XVII. századi perszövegek (Seigniorial court. Texts of cases from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries) (Budapest, 1958) are still valid.Google Scholar G. R. Quaife used similar sources and came to similar conclusions concerning seventeenth-century Somerset as this present paper: see Quaife, R. G., ‘The consenting spinster in a peasant society: aspects of premarital sex in “puritan” Somerset 1645–1660’, Journal of Social History 11, 2 (1977), 228–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Quaife, G. R., Wanton wenches and wayward wives. Peasants and illicit sex during early seventeenth-century England (London, 1979)Google Scholar. For the literature of infanticide, illicit sex, illegitimate children, etc., see Keith Wrightson, ‘Infanticide in European history’ (off-print) and Keith, Wrightson, ‘Infanticide in earlier seventeenth-century England’, Local Population Studies, 15 (1975), 1022Google Scholar; Jean-Louis, Flandrin, Les amours paysannes (XVIe-XIXe siàcle) (Paris, 1975)Google Scholar. Flandrin, J.-L., ‘Les créantailles troyennes (XVe-XVIIe siàcle)’, in Le sexe et l'Occident (Paris, 1981), 6182Google Scholar; Corra, Cigi Corazzol-Lorenda, Esperimenti d'amore. Fatti di giovani nella Feltre del Cinquecento (Feltre, 1981)Google Scholar; Alain, Lottin, La désunion du couple sous l'Ancien Régime. L'exemple du Nord (Lille, 1975)Google Scholar; Sharpe, J. A., Crime in seventeenth-century England (Cambridge, 1983), 5770Google Scholar; Malcomson, R. W., ‘Infanticide in the eighteenth century’, in Crime in England, ed. Cockburn, J. S.. (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Marie-Claude, Phan, ‘La déclaration de grossesse en France (XVIe-XVIIIe siàcle)’, Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine, XXII (1975), 6188Google Scholar. Alain Lottin, ‘Naissances illégitimes et filles-mères à Lille au XVIIIe siècle’, Ibid., XVII (1970), 278–322. François, Lebrun, La vie conjugate sous l'Ancien Régime (Paris, 1975), 150–1.Google Scholar

2 Hungarian National Archives (HNA), Film 16856. Prolhocollum malefactorum, Nagykörös.

3 HNA P 707. Archives of Zichy family, 449. Lad. 521. Fasc. 280, no. 6.

4 Státny Ustredny Archiv, Bratislava, Pálffy, Panská stolica. Arm. Lad. 9, no 52.

5 Archives of Csongrád county, Szentes, Károlyi, Uriszék, a. 32. 28. October 1766.

6 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Banská Bystrica, comitatus Gömöriensis, Proc. magistr. 680. Fasc. XII, no. 524, 688. Fasc. XVI, no. 627.

7 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Banská Bystrica, comitatus Gömöriensis, Proc. magistr. 681. Fasc. XII, no. 536.

8 NHA P 623. Széchényi, III. 2.N, no. 43. See also Flandrin, J.-L., Families. Parenté, maison, sexualité dans l'ancien Société. (Paris, 1884), 97100Google Scholar; Quaife, G. R., Wanton wenches, 68Google Scholar; Lawrence, Stone, The family, sex and marriage in England 1500–1800 (London, 1977), 255, 519, 605Google Scholar; Michael, Anderson, Approaches to the history of the Western family 1500–1914 (London, 1980), 42.Google Scholar

9 HNA P 1322. Batthyány, 190, p.400.Google Scholar

10 Archives of county Vas, Szombathely, Tiszti pörök, Fasc. 5, no. 13.

11 HNA P 235 136. Festetich, 16 October 1748.

12 HNA P 210. 146. Esterházy, no. 2066, p.111. 20 November 1766.

13 Quaife, , Wanton wenches, 74–6.Google Scholar

14 For example: Archives of Vas county, Szombathely, XI/604-H-1, 12 October, 1799 and 7 January 1798. HNA P 157. Esterházy, 64. XI.12, 3 October 1739.

15 Ibid. P 157 67. XVIII. 8, p. 93, HNA P 707. 429. Zichy. Fasc. 264, no. 5.

16 HNA P 235. 136. Festetich-no. 58. A. 18 August 1738.

17 HNA Film 6871. County of Sopron, no. 505. Fasc. 1, no. 10, 21 May 1770.

18 HNA P 157.67. Esterházy XVIII, 8, 19 May 1752.

19 Ferenc, Schram, (ed.) Magyarországi boszorkányperek (Witchcraft trials in Hungary) (Budapest, 1983), II, 32.Google Scholar

20 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Košice, Proc. crim. Trestné pisom. Fasc. II, no. 32. (353), 6 September 1715.

21 Schram, , Magyarországi, 1, 98.Google Scholar

22 HNA Festetich P 235. Acta juris gladii 136, no. 89.

23 Schram, , Magyarországi, II, 261.Google Scholar

24 HNA R 320/2. 20 June 1716.

25 Schram, , Magyarországi, II, 615.Google Scholar

26 HNA P 235 1336. Festetich. Acta juris gladii, 16 October 1748.

27 HNA Film 6872. No. 42. Fasc. 11./19. 27 December 1776.

28 HNA P 343 40. Kállay, 16 March 1793.

29 Quaife, , Wanton wenches, 107.Google Scholar

30 Archives of Csongrád county, Szentes. Proc. crim. b. 22. 2 July 1777. a. 35. 19 January 1772.

31 Státny Ustredny Archiv, Bratislava, Pálffy, III. 11. XII. 56. 18 February 1778.

32 Archives of Csongrád county, Szentes, Károlyi, IV. A. 53. a. 28. 14 April 1761.

33 HNA P 707/430. Zichy. Fasc. 264 and B. no. 7. 20 November 1737.

34 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Bratislava, Proc. crim. Trestné spisy, A XII.

35 HNA Film 16856. Prothocollum malefactorum, Nagykoros, 23 April 1787.

36 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Kosice, Comitatus Abaujváriensis, Trestné pisomnosti, Fasc. VI, no. 27.

37 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Banská Bystrica, Comitatus Gömöriensis, Proc. magistr. 666. Fasc. VI. no. 335.

38 HNA E 694./24/. Szepesi kamara, Tokaji uradalmi ügyészég, 16 August 1765.

39 Státny Ustredny Archiv, Bratislava, Pálffy, Panská stolica 599. (1838). 2 October 1747.

40 HNA P 707. Zichy (448) Fasc. 280, no. 4. 29 December 1734.

41 Stone, The family, 520Google Scholar; Quaife, , Wanton wenches, 172Google Scholar. Péter Mélius, Herbárium, Kolozsvár (Cluj) (1578, reprint, Bucharest 1979), 137; János Halmai, Kossuth-csillag, Vénusz-sarucska (Popular names of medicinal herbs) Budapest, 1948, 21. Special thanks for his contribution to my friend, Dr Péter Lakatos (Semmelweiss University of Medical Sciences, Budapest).

42 HNA P 157. 62. V. 35. Esterházy, 17 May 1729. and ibid, XIX. 12. (1754).

43 HNA P 707. 435. Zichy. Fasc. 267, no. 378, HNA P 1322. 191. Batthyány p. 552. 5 September 1773, HNA P 707. 430. Zichy Fasc. 265, no. 50, HNA P 623. III. 2. N. no. 43. Széchényi.

44 HNA P 235. 136. Festetich no. 89. 22 November 1756.

45 Státny Oblastny Archiv, Bratislava, Proc. crim. no. 31 16 August 1756.

46 Ibid, no. 124 and 126.

47 HNA R 320. (2). 29 July 1793.

48 Archives of Somogy county, Kaposvár, Processus magistratuales, I. index, no. 521, Péter Tóth, A szexuális deviancia, mint egyéni és társadalmi konfliktusok feloldása a XVIII. században (Sexual deviancy as resolution for personal and social conflicts in the eighteenth century). (Palócföld, 1990 (2) XXIV), 39–44.