Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T12:37:19.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. D. Denniston
Affiliation:
Hertford college, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 164 note 1 Mr. Thomson meets this difficulty by suggesting πντων μετασχὼν δ τετολμηκώς τ' μο, which is attractive (or, alternatively, στα τολμσας: but I doubt δτα): but objection (I) remains.

page 165 note 1 I had overlooked E. Supp. 908; ‘i.e. δκαιον,’ Murray: but both reading and interpretation seem to me highly doubtful (see Grégoire in the Budé edition).