Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:28:06.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Footnotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1964 , pp. 13
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dio (liv. 3. 4) records the conspiracy under 22, but scholars have proposed 23 in view of the entry for that year in the Fasti Capitolini. The matter is still controversial: cf. J. P. V. D. Balsdon, Gnomon, xxxiii (1961), 395.

2 Aly, op. cit., p. 112, col. 2, line 38.