Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:59:31.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terentiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. S. Phillimore
J. S. Phillimore
Affiliation:
Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , May 1920 , pp. 57 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 58 note 1 For this phrase cf. Quis uideor? in And. 702.

page 58 note 2 MSS. are cited according to Umpfenbach throughout.

page 59 note 1 Vulg. SY. Quern? CH. Istunc seruolum. But Syrus asks, ‘Whom do you mean by that?’ which is Quern istunc?

page 60 note 1 To be read as a troch. dim. Catal. Like v. 191.

page 60 note 2 Needlessly mispunctuated in Umpfenbach.

page 62 note 1 ‘In compositis dictionibus unus accentus est non minus qmm in una parte orationis ut malesanus interealoci’, Diomed. Keil 1, p. 433, [Prise] de Accent. Keil 3, p. 520; cf. Priscian viii. 88, Keil 2, p. 440, mágisterequitum. It is enough to refer to Professor Lindsay's writings on the subject.