Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:16:07.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Cruces in Virgil Re-Considered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. S. Phillimore
J. S. Phillimore
Affiliation:
The University, Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , August 1916 , pp. 146 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 151 note 1 Aelius Donatus, Probus, and the Statian scholiast. All these are witnesses to the scansion tulěrunt, which is, of course, a possible scansion, but unexampled elsewhere in the Eclogues and the Georgics.

page 151 note 2 At the risk of a charge of incertum per incertius, I will confess a suspicion that in Propertius III. xiii. 10 the true reading is: ‘quis toleret fastus, Icarioti, tuos?’

page 152 note 1 Carina scindenda Thilo-Hagen.