Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:36:01.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Posidippus and Delphi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

C. A. Trypanis
Affiliation:
Exeter College, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Now published by Klaffenbach in I.G. ix. 1, no. 16 A, ll. 24 f.: .

2 ll. 9–10:

Σελε⋯κωι [c. 14 l.] Ποσειδ⋯ππωι

7 vac. Ἀσκληπι⋯ππωι 11 vac. Each line consists of abour forty letters.

3 See Flacelière, , Les Aitoliens à Delphes, pp 179f.Google Scholar

4 See bibliography in Page, D. L., Greek Literary Papyri, i, p. 470Google Scholar. All details on the hand and readings in Schubart, , Symbolae philologicae O. A. Danielsson octogenario dicatae, Upsala, 1932, pp. 290 f.Google Scholar

5 Schubart reads: φ⋯μη, τῇ νιφ⋯εντ' οἰκ⋯α το⋯ Παρ⋯ου and Diels φ⋯μην, τ⋯ν ἠφ⋯εντ' οἰκ⋯α το⋯ Παρ⋯ου. Both are unconvincing.

6 Κρ⋯σης Trypanis: Tablet: ⋯κχρ⋯σαις … καναχ⋯σαις Schubart.

7 Schubart suggests: ; Diels . Both are impossible. I should like to suggest . The Doric form of πρ⋯ς (ποτ⋯) is tenable, because Posidippus occasionally uses Doric forms. See also Weinreich, op. cit., p. 439. ὦ ἄνα was suggested by Beazley.