Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00991625/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00991625a.jpg)
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1905
References
1 Surely the conjecture in Amph. 1042, me agam for me ducam, hardly deserves a place (p. 1372) in the Thesaurus.
2 Priscian (vol. i. p. 392 H.) ascribes to the ‘vetustissimi’ the use of ludifico for ludificor. On ludificatus sum see the (defective) passage in Nonius (p. 476 Me.).
- 1
- Cited by