Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:56:42.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plato on Priests and Kings in Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

J. Gwyn Griffiths
J. Gwyn Griffiths
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1965 , pp. 156 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. H. Kees, Das Priestertum im ägyptischen Stoat vom Neuen Reich bis zur Spätzeit (Leiden, 1953), 1: ‘Priestertum ist in Ägypten Königsdienst.’

2 I owe this reference to Dr. Dieter Müller.

3 Die politische Geschichte Ägyptens vom 7. bis zum 4. Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1953), 49 ff. Ĉerný in Parker, A Säite Oracle Papyrus from Thebes in the Brooklyn Museum (Providence, 1962), 36, describes it as ‘a sacerdotal state with Amon-re' as its head and his High Priest in a position not much below that of a real king’.

4 Geschichte des Altertums, ii. a (Stuttgart, 1931), 42 ff.

5 There is no valid reason why a still earlier tradition may not be implicated. Both Meyer and Kienitz assume, by the way, that Diodorus is following Hecataeus of Abdera. W. Spoerri, Spathellenistische Berichte über Welt, Kultur und Götter (Basel, 1959) has shown that this is unlikely; cf. the present writer's review in J.H.S. lxxxii (1962), 182 f.

6 A. D. Nock in A.J.A. liii (1949), 283, n. 40, wondered whether the Achaemenids in a Persian background were not behind the description (‘a reflection of what was now believed of the Persian king’).