Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T03:41:34.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frazer's Adonis, Attis, Osiris - Adonis, Attis, Osiris: Studies in the History of Oriental Religion. By J. G. Frazer, D.C.L., LL.D., Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. London: Macmillan & Co.; New York: The Macmillan Company, 1906. 8vo. One Vol. Pp. xvi + 339. 8s. 6d.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

James Hope Moulton
James Hope Moulton
Affiliation:
Didsbury College, Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 1907 , pp. 52 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 52 note 1 A brief catalogue of misprints may render a humble service. P. 11 shows us Bend-Hadad. P. 17, 1. 7, has a semi-colon for a comma. P. 46 misspells ‘hoopoe.’ P. 154, n2, ὡσιοῦν, and 170, n3, ἐδοκοῦν, are wrongly accented. Finally, on pp. 240 and 296 the Egyptian month Phamenoth gets its m and n transposed.

page 53 note 1 Cf. the letter of Eumenes II to the high priest Attis in Dittenberger's Orientis Graeci Inscr. Select. 315 (163 B.C.) and the editor's note.

page 53 note 2 This bald statement needs expanding: see my art. in Hastings' Dict, of the Bible iv. on ‘Zoroastrianism,’ p. 990. It is not, moreover, absolutely certain that the Magi of Matt. ii. were Zoroastrians.

page 53 note 3 See my paper, ‘It is his Angel,’ in Journ. of Theol. Studies, 1902, pp. 514 ff., esp. 520–527.1