Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:48:52.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeschylus, Persae 611 ff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

A. D. Fitton Brown
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 References in Pauly–Wissowa, s.v., and Daremberg–Saglio, s.v. (I take εὔποτον and ποτ⋯ν to imply only that the ghost would consume the offerings.) No doubt βο⋯τυρον got its name from the mistaken belief that it differed from τυρ⋯ς only in being made with cow's milk and not in method of preparation.

2 References in Haarhoff, , ‘The Bees of Virgil’ (Greece and Rome, vii [1960], 155 ff.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 I am inclined to agree with Wilamowitz and Groeneboom, comparing ξανθῷ τ' ⋯λα⋯ῳ in the somewhat similar passage, Eur. I.T. 633.

4 This statement is confirmed by Hyams, , Illustrated London News, 7 Jan. 1961.Google Scholar

5 So Forbes in History of Technology, i. 275.