Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:52:12.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Hungarian Theologians in the Late Renaissance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Z. J. Kosztolnyik
Z. J. Kosztolnyik
Affiliation:
Mr. Kosztolnyik is professor of history in Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the latter half of the fifteenth century, during the reign of Matthias Corvinus (1458–1490), and in the early sixteenth century, some Hungarian churchmen enhanced religious scholarship in their own country and abroad by their preaching and writing. The writings of these men exemplify the development in Hungary of support for the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. These men also spoke out against the moral and spiritual deficiencies of the court. The activities and writings of these theologians pose a challenge to the chronicler of literature and of intellectual and religious history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 5 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Bonfinis, Antonius de, Rerum Ungaricarum decades IV, ed. Fógel, Joseph, 4 vols. (Leipzig-Budapest, 1936–1941), 3:218–247, 4:1–169,Google Scholar though “unkritisch, nur für die Zeit Matthias glaubwürdig” see Potthast, August, Bibliotheca historica medii aevi, rev. ed., 2 vols. (Berlin, 1896), 1:163.Google ScholarRansanus, Petrus, Epithoma rerum Hungararum, ed. Kulcsár, Peter (Budapest, 1977)Google Scholar, par. 29 37; my review in Austrian history Yearbook 17–18 (1981–1982): 361–362;Google Scholar text also in Schwandtner, lohannes Georgius, ed., Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum veteres ac genuini, 3 vols. (Vienna, 1746–1748), 1:322–412.Google ScholarThurhóz, M. Iohannes, Chronica Hungarorum, 4:63–67 1:39–291;Google Scholar on Thurócz, , compare Hain, L., Repertorium bibliographicum, 2 vols. (Stuttgart-Tübingen, 1826–1838; reprint, 2 vols. in 4, Milan, 1948), 1/2:414,Google Scholar nos. 15516–15518; Mályusz, Elemer, A Thuróczy Krónika és forrásai (The Thurocz Chronicle and its sources) (Budapest, 1967), pp. 124–141.Google ScholarZsilinszky, Mátyás, “Mátyás legrégibb történészei,” (King Matthias's earliest chroniclers) in Sándor Márki, ed., Mátyás király emlékkönyu (Memorial volume to King Matthias) (Budapest, 1902), pp. 241–295;Google ScholarNehring, Karl, “Quellen zur ungarischen Äussenpolitik der zweiten Hälfte des 15 Jahrhunderts,” Levéltᾰi Közlemények 47 (1976): 87–99;Google ScholarKlaniczay, Tibor, “Galeatto Marzio és Mátyás,” Világosság 18 (1977): 32–36;Google ScholarStoll, Béla, ed., A magyar irodalomtörténet bibliográfiája (Bibliography of Hungarian Literature) (Budapest, 1972), pp. 238–239;Google ScholarCsapodi, Csaba, Bibliothaeca Corviniana (New York, 1969)Google Scholar; Gabriel Adriányi, “Die Kirchenpolitik des Matthias Corvinus (1458–1490),” Ungarn Jahrbuch 10(1979): 83–92;Google ScholarHorváth, János, Az irodalmi müveltség megoszlása (Differentiation between religion and secular aspects in Hungarian literature), 2d ed. (Budapest, 1944), pp. 147–159;Google ScholarPintér, Jenö, Magyar irodalomtörténet (Synthesis of Hungarian literature), 8 vols. (Budapest, 1930–1941), 1:453–467.Google ScholarHóman, Bálint and Szekfü, Gyula, Magyar történet (Hungarian history), 6th ed., 5 vols. (Budapest, 1939), 2:467–563;Google ScholarBak, J. M., Königtum und Stände in Ungarn im 14–16 Jahrhundert (Wiesbaden, 1973), pp. 54–61;Google ScholarElekes, Lajos et al. , Magyarország története 1526-ig (History of Hungary to 1526) (Budapest, 1961), pp. 302–306;Google ScholarFraknói, Vilmos, Hunyásdi Mátyás király (King Matthias Hunyadi) (Budapest, 1890), pp. 139–203;Google ScholarCsánki, Dezsö, “Matthias König der Ungarn,” Ungartsche Rundschau 2 (1913): 85–96, 316.Google Scholar

2. Horváth, Cyrill, “Michael de Hungaria XIII beszéde,” (Thirteen sermons of Michael of Hungary) Irodalomtörténeti Közlemények 5 (1895): 129–139;Google ScholarHain, , Repertorium bibliographicum, 1:113–116,Google Scholar nos. 9043–9050; Klaniczay, Tibor, A magyar irodalom története 1660-ig (History of Hungarian literature to 1660) (Budapest, 1964), p. 139;Google ScholarMályusz, Elemér, Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon (Structure of the ecclesiastical stratum in medieval Hungary) (Budapest, 1971), pp. 351–357;Google Scholar my review in Austrian History Yearbook 14 (1978): 288–290;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHorváth, Cyrill, A régi magyar irodalom története (History of early Hungarian literature) (Budapest, 1899), pp. 64–66;Google Scholar for a theological analysis of the sermons, see Dám, Ince, A Szeplötelen Fogantatás védelme Magyarországon (Defense of the Immaculate doctrine in Hungary) (Rome, 1955), pp. 18–22, 93–96.Google Scholar

3. L. N., [sic], Radix et origo coenobitarum religionis s. Pauli primi eremiti cum brevissima monasteni s. Cruets in Pilisio territoru Slrigoniensis relatione a beato Kuxebio Strigomensi canonico, postea Ordinis praefati primi in regno Hungariae provincialis erecti (Rome, 1683)Google Scholar; Bene, Mihäly, “Kolostorok a Galga mentén,” (Old monasteries along the Galga stream) Vigilia 46 (1981): 827–829;Google ScholarKisbán, Emil, A magyar Pálosrend története (History of the Hungarian Paulist Order) (Budapest, 1938)Google Scholar, passim.

4. Pintér, , Magyar irodalomtörténet, 1:425;Google ScholarHorváth, János, Az irodalmi müveltség megoszlása, p. 561;Google ScholarIványi, Béla, “A Szent Domonkos rend római központi levéltára,” (Central archives of the Dominican Order in Rome) Levéltári Közlemények 7 (1929): 1–27.Google Scholar

5. Horváth, Cyrill, Régidalorn, p. 65,Google Scholar lists his publications at some length.

6. Dam, Ince, “Andreas Pannonius ferrarai priorságának viszontagságai,” (The eventful conventual priorship of Andreas Pannonius in Ferrara) Civitas Dei 1 (1956): 101–110;Google ScholarAntore, Anton in Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, 15 vols. (Paris, 1908–1950),Google Scholar 2, col. 2312; Abel, Jenö, Analecta nova ad historiam renascentium in Hungaria litterarum spectantia (Budapest, 1903), pp. 158–162;Google ScholarHorváth, Cyrill, “Andreas Pannonius,” Egyetemes Philológiai Közlöny 66 (1946): 257–268;Google ScholarRévész, Mihály, “Andreas Pannonius és Borino de Scala,” Egyetemes Philológiai közlöny 59 (1935): 75–84;Google ScholarVárady, Imre, La letteratura italiana e la sua influenza in Ungheria (Rome, 1934), p. 80;Google Scholar on d'Este, see Hermann, Egyed, A katolikus egyház története Magyarországon 1914-ig (History of the Catholic Church in Hungary to 1914), vol. 1Google Scholar, Dissertationes Hungaricae ex historia Ecclesiae (Munich, 1973), p. 196.Google ScholarBékesi, Emil, “Magyar irók Hunyadi Mátyás korából,” (Hungarian writers in the age of Matthias Corvinus) Katholikus Szemle 16 (1902): 134–144.Google Scholar

7. On Nicolaus de Mirabilibus, see Mályusz, Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, p. 282 n. 28, 358; Pintér, , Magyar irodalomtörténet, 1:426, 494;Google ScholarKöpeczi, Béla et al. , eds., Erdély története (History of Transylvania), 3 vols. (Budapest, 1986), 1:376–377.Google Scholar

8. Békesi, , “Magyar irók,” p. 743;Google ScholarMályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, p. 357.Google Scholar

9. Adalbert wrote poetry about the Mother of God, the angels, and Paul the Hermit; see Békesi, , “Magyar irók,” pp. 861–869;Google ScholarPintér, , Magyar irodalomtörténet, 1:677–681;Google Scholar Tibor Kardos, Középkori kultúra, középkori költészet (Poetry in medieval culture: beginnings of Hungarian literature) (Budapest, n.d.), pp. 236–239.

10. Dézsi, László, Szent Ágoston reguiáinak magyar forditása Caelius (Bánffy) Gergelytöl, 1537 (The 1537 Hungarian translation by Caelius [Bánffy] of the Augustinian Rule) (Budapest, 1900)Google Scholar, passim.

11. Compare his Collectanea in Sacram Apocalypsin divi Joanni Apostoli et Evangeiistae (Paris, 1571), and known previous editions; Stegmüller, F., ed., Repertorium biblicum medii aevi, 4 vols. (Madrid, 1950), 2:363–364, nos. 2623–2624.Google Scholar

12. Benger, N., Annualium eremocenobiticorum Ordinis Fratrum Eremitarum s. Pauli primi eremitae, vol. 1 (Possonii, 1743), pp. 181–184.Google Scholar

13. Dám, , A Szeplötelen Fogantatás védelme Magyarországon, pp. 46–49;Google Scholar I. de Long, , Bibliotheca sacra in binos syllabos distincta (Paris, 1723), p. 892;Google Scholar compare with Hefele, Karl, Der hl. Bernardin von Siena und die franziskanische Wanderpredigt in Italien wáhrend des XV Jahrhunderts (Freiburg, 1912), pp. 75, 91.Google Scholar

14. On Oswald, see Horváth, Richard, Laskai Ozsvát (Budapest, 1932), p. 7;Google ScholarTimár, Kálmán, “Laskai Ozsvát és a bibliográffia,” (Bibliography on Oswald de Laska) Magyar Köyvszemle 18 (1910): 12–132.Google Scholar On Pelbart, , compare Kovács, Sándor V., ed., Temesvári Pelbárt válogatott irásai (Selected writings of Pelbart of Temesvár) (Budapest, 1982), pp. 411–427;Google ScholarSzilády, Áron, Temesváari Pelbárt élete és munkái (Life and works of Pelbart of Temesvár) (Budapest, 1880), p. 3Google Scholar n. 1; Karácsonyi, János, Szent Ferenc rendjének története Magyarországon 1711-ig (History of he Franciscans in Hungary prior to 1711), 2 vols. (Budapest, 1923), 2:571;Google ScholarAdriányi, Gabriel, “Pelbart von Temesvár (ca. 1435–1504) und seine trinitarischen Predigtvorlagen,” Im Gespräch mit dem Dreieinigen Gott: Elemente einer trinitarischen Theologie: Festschrift zum 65 Geburtstag von Wilhelm Breuning, ed. Böhnke, M. and Heinz, H. (Düsseldorf, 1985), pp. 276–286.Google Scholar

15. “Gewardus Ladislai de Themeswar,” in Album studiosorum Universitatis Cracoviensis, 5 vols. (Cracow, 1887–1956), 1:156,Google Scholar in the year 1458, without further comment.

16. Pelbart, of Temesvár, , Sermones pomerii de sanctis (Norimbergae, 1486)Google Scholar, sermo 101; see also Gieysztor, Alexander et al. , History of Poland (Warsaw, 1968), pp. 157–158;Google ScholarHorváth, Cyrill, Pomerius (Budapest, 1894), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar On the religious faculty was Paulus Pyczkowski, a known philosopher-theologian; see Waldapfel, Jenö, “A krakkói egyetem és a magyar-lengyel szellemi élet a renaissance korban,” (Hungaro-Polish intellectual contacts in the renaissance at the University of Cracow) Egyeternes Philológiai Közlöny 69 (1946): 26–35;Google ScholarWaldapfel, , “Le role de l'université de Cracovie dans la culture honroise,” Annales Universitatis Budapestiensis, sec. phil., 5 (1964): 3–1.Google Scholar

17. Pelbart's, ComparePomerium de sanctis (Hagenau, 1499),Google Scholar sermo 39, pars hyemalis; Horváth, Cyrill, Temesvári Pelbárt és beszédei (Pelbart of Temesvár in his sermons) (Budapest, 1899), pp. 25–26;Google ScholarTrencsényi-Waldapfel, Imre, Humanizmus és nemzeti irodalom (Humanism in national literature) (Budapest, 1966), pp. 344–346;Google ScholarSzilády, , Temesvári Pelbárt élete és munkái, p. 33.Google Scholar

18. Wislocki, W., ed., Acta rectoralis Universitatis Cracoviensis (Cracow, 1893)Google Scholar, entries 3215 (10 Feb. 1534) and 3224 (13 Apr. 1534); Békesi “Magyar irók,” p. 332 n. 4; Szalóczi, Pelbárt, “Temesvári Pelbárt,” Vigilia 14 (1949): 721–727.Google Scholar

19 . Gulyás, Pál, A könyu sorsa Magyarországon (History of books in Hungary), 3 vols. (Budapest, 1961–1965), 1:160–169Google Scholar (a revised version of his A könyvnyomtatás Magyarországon a XV és XVI században [The printing press in Hungary during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries] [Budapest, 1931], pp. 17–26)Google Scholar; Fritz, Joseph, “König Matthias und der Buchdruck,” in Humel, Albert, ed., Gutenberg Jahrbuch (Mainz, 1939), pp. 128–139;Google Scholar see also Balogh, Jözsef, ed., A müvészet Mátyás király udvarában (The arts in the court of King Matthias), vol. 1, Adattár (Data) (Budapest, 1966), pp. 644–647.Google Scholar

20 . Borsa, Gedeon, “A budai Hess nyomda új megvilágitaban,” (Recent research on the Hess Press in Buda) Magyar Könyvszemle 89 (1973): 138–149;Google ScholarMrsSoltész, Zoltán, “Milyen tervekkel és felszerelessel jöhetett Budára Hess András?” (What were the plans of Andreas Hess at Buda?) Magyar Könyuszemle 90 (1974): 1–12.Google Scholar

21. Zawart, Antoine, “The History of Franciscan Preaching and Franciscan Preachers,” Franciscan Studies, o.s., 7 (1928): 241–587Google Scholar, esp. 333–335.

22. Dictionnaire catholique, vol. 11, cols. 1657–1658; Timár, Kálmán, “Laskai Osváth és a bibliográfia,” (Bibliographical data on Oswald de Laska) Magyar Könyuszemle 18 (1910: 122–127;Google ScholarHain, , Repertorium bibliographicum, 1:113–115,Google Scholar nos. 9051–9056; Wadding, L., Scriptores ordinis minorum (Rome, 1906), pp. 181, 183–184;Google ScholarHorváth, Richárd, Laskai Osvát (Budapest, 1932), pp. 7–8;Google ScholarBeöthy, Zsolt, A magyar irodalom története (History of Hungarian Literature), ed. Badics, Frigyes, 3d ed. 2 vols. (Budapest, 1901–1903), 1:175–177;Google ScholarMályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, pp. 303, 354–355.Google Scholar

23. Horváth, Richárd, Laskai Osvát, pp. 26–27, 51–57;Google ScholarDám, , A Szeplötelen Fogantatás védelme Magyarországon, p. 102.Google Scholar

24 . “Solemnis praedicator at in theologia non mediocriter imbutus… in conventu Budensi legebat fratribus aptis super Sententiis”; compare B. de Zalka, “Chronica Fratrum Minorum de observantia provinciae Bosniae et Hungariae,” in Ferenc Toldy, ed., Analecta, (Pest, nd.), 1:250.Google Scholar Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12548, states that Pelbart's first book was published in 1483. On the educational background of the clergy in Hungary, see Békefi, Remig, A káptalani iskolák története Magyarországon 1540-ig (History of cathedral schools in Hungary prior to 1540) (Budapest, 1910), pp. 344–364.Google Scholar

25. Karácsonyi, , Szent Ferenc rendje, 2:567–570;Google Scholar Ferenc Toldy's university lectures, A magyar nemzeti irodalom története (History of Hungarian national literature), 4th ed. (Budapest, 1878), pp. 31–32;Google ScholarDomonkos, L. S., “Bildung und Wissenschaft,” in Klaniczay, Tibor and Stangler, Georg, eds., Schallaburg '82: Matthias Corvinus und die Renaissance in Ungarn, 1458–1541, Landmuseum of Lower Austria Catalogue, n.s., no. 118 (Vienna, 1982), pp. 48–52.Google Scholar

26. “Litterarum divinarum professor eximissimus,” reads the reference to the 1498 edition of Pelbart's sermons; compare Copinger, W. A., ed., Supplement to Hain's Repertorium bibliographicum, 2 vols., (1895; reprint, 2 vols. in 3, Milan, 1950)Google Scholar, 2, no. 4665. Pelbart was a professor at the Franciscan house of studies and not at the “gymnasium generale” supported by the court; see Pray, Georgius, Annales regum Hungariae, 5 vols. (Vienna, 1764–1770), 3:315–319.Google Scholar On Pray, see Horváth, Cyrill, Irodalom, pp. 696–697.Google Scholar On schools of higher learning, see Ábel, Jenö, Egyetemeink a középkorban (Medieval Hungarian universities) (Budapest, 1881), p. 64Google Scholar n. 31; Békefi, , Káptalani iskolák, pp. 290–323;Google ScholarElekes, , Magyarország története 1526-ig, pp. 353–354;Google ScholarDomonkos, L. S., “The Origins of the University of Pozsony,” The New Review: Journal of East-European History 9 (1969): 270–279;Google ScholarDenifle, Henrik, Die Entstehung der Universitäten des Mittelalters (1885; reprint, Graz, 1956), pp. 418–422;Google ScholarBalogh, , Mátyás király, pp. 150–151.Google Scholar

27. “Qauasi subridendo obdormivit in Domino”; compare Orban, F., Historia, seu compendiosa decretorum provinciae Ordinis Minorum s. P. Francisci (Kassoviae, 1759), p. 16.Google Scholar

28. “Et Pelbartus plebians; artus nomine miles; docuit plebem, vicit et hostem, obtinet nomen; …tu nostrae decus gentis, to gloria nobis iam credita cernis, et coelum te patria tenet; et Deum cum patre Seraphico nobis ora”; quoted by Szilády, who gives the date of his death as 19 January 1504, Temesvári Pelbát élete és munkái, pp. 16, 17.

29. Pelbart, , Pomerium de sanctis, pars hyemalis (Hagenau, 1499)Google Scholar, sermo 8; Mályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, pp. 355–356.Google Scholar

30. See his Christmas sermon in Pomerium de sanctis, pars hyemalis, sermo 17, or sermo 69 for Good Friday; see also Toldy, Ferenc, ed., Magyar szentek legendái a carthausi névtelentöl (Lives of Hungarian saints by the Anonymous Carthusian) (Pest, 1859), pp. 3–32, 33–58.Google Scholar

31. Compare his Pomerium de sanctis, pars aestivalis, sermo 52; Vida, Teodor, “Temesvari Pelbárt kapcsolatai kora társadalmával,” (Pelbart's social contacts with his contemporaries) Vigilia 41 (1976): 671–677.Google Scholar

32. See his Pomerius de sanctis, pars aestivalis, sermo 17; Békesi, , “Magyar irók,” pp. 331–332;Google Scholar1 Stegmüller, , Repertorium biblicum medii aevi, 4:213–214Google Scholar, no. 6371, 1–4, though confusing him with Oswald de Laska!

33. Szalóczi, “Temesvári Pelbárt,” 721.

34. See Pelbart's, Pomerium de tempore (Hagenau, 1498)Google Scholar, pars paschalis, sermo 35, or his sermon on Gerard of Csanád (d. 1046) in Frigyes Brisits, ed., Temesvári Pelbárt müveiböl (Selections from the works of Pelbart of Temesvár), vol. 6, Magyar irodalmi ritkaságok (Rare pieces of Hungarian literature), ed. László Vajthó (Budapest, 1931), p. 108,Google Scholar and compare with Bole, J. and Polivka, G., Anmerkungen zu den Kinder- und Huasmärchen der Brüder Grimm, rev. ed., 5 vols. (Leipzig, 1915—), 5:176–180.Google Scholar On Gerard of Csanád, see Kosztolnyik, Z. J., Five Eleventh Century Hungarian Kings (New York, 1981), pp. 46–55, 161–167.Google Scholar

35. Compare Brisits, , Temesvári Pelbárt müveiböl, pp. 94–97;Google ScholarPüskely, Mária, Arpádházi Szent Erzsébet (St. Elizabeth of Hungary) (Rome, 1981), pp. 38–39;Google ScholarIjjas, Antal, Szentek élete (Lives of the saints), 2 vols. (Budapest, 1976), 2:111–120.Google Scholar

36. The Hagenau, 1498 edition, cited by Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12563 (also no. 12566), or the Argentinae, 1496 edition, ibid., no. 12565. Zolnai, G., Nyelvemlékeink a könyunyomtatäs koráig (Hungarian linguistic remains prior to the age of printing) (Budapest, 1894), pp. 495–498.Google Scholar

37. His Stellarium (Hagenau, 1498), prologus; Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12566, an earlier version is no. 12562; Dám, Ince, “Kegyosztó társa Krisztusnak,” (Mother of Christ; Co-redeemer) Vigilia 13 (1948); 1–5.Google Scholar

38. Kudora, János, A magyar katolikus egyházi beszéd irodalmának története (The development of Hungarian sermon literature) (Budapest, 1902), pp. 68–74;Google Scholar Lajos Katona and Szinnyei, Ferenc, Geschichte der ungarischen Literatur (Leipzig, 1911), pp. 16–23;Google ScholarMályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, p. 355;Google ScholarKlaniczay, , Irodalom, pp. 139–140.Google Scholar

39. See Horváth, János, Magyar irodalmi müveltség kezdetei (Origins of Hungarian literary culture), 2d ed. (Budapest, 1944), pp. 57–62;Google ScholarSzinnyei, József, Magyar irók élete és munkái (Lives and works of Hungarian writers), 14 vols. (Budapest, 1891–1914)Google Scholar, 10, cols. 720–730.

40. Horváth, Cyrill, “Temesvári Pelbárt beszédei,” (Sermons of Pelbart of Temesvár) Egyetemes Philológiai Közlöny, Supplementum 1 (1899); 145–164;Google ScholarMenczer, Béla, Commentary on Hungarian Literature (Castrop-Rauxel, 1956), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

41. Stellarium (Hagenau, 1498), 7:3:2; Teetaert, A., in Dictionnaire catholique, 12,Google Scholar cols. 715–718.

42. Stellarium, 5;3; Dám, , A Szeplötelen Fogantatás védelme Magyarországon, pp. 24–32;Google ScholarDám, , “Repertorium ex operibus Pelbarti de Temesvár, O.F.M., aliorumque ab Angelo Elli Mediolanensi collectum, ” Scientiae artesque (reprint, Rome, n.d.), pp. 105–120;Google ScholarAmeri, H., Doctrina theologorum de Immaculata B. M. V. Conceptione tempore Concilii Basiliensis (Rome, 1954)Google Scholar; Aldássy, Antal, “Mária ünnepek kérdése a bázeli zsinaton,” (Questions concerning the feasts of Mary raised at the Synod of Basel) Katholikus Szemle 44 (1930); 661–669;Google Scholar Hóman and Szekfü, , Magyar történet, 4;122–123,Google Scholar on Pelbart's influence in the Baroque age.

43. de tempore, Pomerium (Hagenau, 1498)Google Scholar, pars aestiva, sermo 20; pomerii, Sermones (Norimbergae, 1486)Google Scholar; Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12549.

44. Compare Pomerium de sanctis, pars hyemalis, sermo 29; Sermones de tempore, pars hyemalis et paschalis; Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12550.

45. Pelbart, Pomerium de sanctis, pars aestivalis, sermo 52; Höman and Szekfü, , Magyar történet, 2:562.Google Scholar

46. Pomerium de tempore (Hagenau, 1498), pars paschalis, sermo 8; Sermones (Norimbergae, 1483); Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12548.

47. Pomerium de tempore, pars aestiva, sermo 42; Pintér, , Magyar irodalomtörténet, 1:433–440;Google Scholar Waldapfel, “A krakkói egyetem és a magyar-lengyel szellemi élet a renaissance korban”; exchange of letters between King Matthias and Rome, in Fraknoi, Vilmos, ed., Mátyás király levelei (Correspondence of King Matthias), 2 vols. (Budapest, 1893–1895), 1:259–260, 335–336.Google Scholar

48. Pomerium de sanctis, pars hyemalis, sermo 29; Ferenc Galla, “Mátyás király és a Szentszék” (King Matthias and the Holy See), in Lukinich, Imre, ed., Mátyás király emlékkönyu születésének ötszázéves fordulójára (King Matthias memorial volume on the 500th anniversary of his birth), 2 vols. (Budapest, 1940), 1:95–169.Google Scholar Elmer Mályusz, “Matthias Corvinus,” in P. R. Rohden and Ostrogorsky, Georg, eds., Menschen die Geschichte machten, 2 vols. (Vienna, 1931), 2:187–191.Google Scholar

49. The monarch used the church as a political tool; he wrote to Pope Sixtus IV that if his Holiness were to name the new bishop of Modrus (thereby to ignore the privilege, “ius nostrum regium,” of the Hungarian king), he and the realm would secede from the church; see Marczali, Henric et al. , eds., Enchiridion fontium historiae Hungarorum (Budapest, 1901), pp. 275–276;Google Scholar compare with Bonfini, , Rerum Ungaricarum decades IV, 4:40–41,Google Scholar and with Thurócz, , Chronica, 4:67;Google Scholar and Mályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, pp. 296–299.Google Scholar

50. Pelbart, Sermones de tempore, pars aestiva, sermo 42; see his sermon for the feast of Ladislas I of Hungary, in Brisits, , Temesvári Pelbárt müveiböl, p. 59.Google Scholar The monarch's letters may throw some light upon his relations with the Franciscans; see Fraknói, , Mátyás levelei, 2:2–5, 229–230;Google Scholar or Monumenta Vaticana Hungariae: Matthiae Corvini epistolae ad Romanos Pontifices et ab eis acceptae, ser. 1, vol. 6 (Budapest, 1891), p. 105.Google Scholar The report of papal legate Bishop Bertrand Marasch of Castello about the policies and the glory of the court of King Matthias has a definite renaissance coloring (dated Fall, 1483); see Marczali, , Enchiridion, pp. 277–279.Google Scholar

51. Pomerium de sanctis, pars aestiva, sermo 17, and sermo 15; Ransanus, Epithoma, par. 37. For Matthias's reply to Rome, see Fraknoi, , Mátyás levelei, 2:26, 49–50;Google ScholarBalogh, , Mátyás udvara, pp. 662–667.Google Scholar

52. Hain, Compare, Repertorium bibliographcum, 2:50–54,Google Scholar nos. 12548–12560; Dám, , A Szeplötelen Fogantatäs védelme Magyarországon, pp.98–100;Google ScholarThienemann, Tivadar, “Temesvári Pelbárt német kortársai,” (Pelbart's German contemporaries) Egyetemes Philológiai Közlóny 44 (1920): 73–85;Google ScholarRozsondai, Márta, “Temesvári Pelbárt népszerüsége Europában: miröl vallanak a könyvkötések?” (Do the bindings of his works bear witness to the popularity of Pelbart in Europe?) Magyar Könyvszemle 100 (1984): 300–312;Google ScholarWeferich, E., “Bio-bibliographische Notizen über Franziskanerlehrer des 15 Jahrhunderts,” Franziskanische Studien 29 (1942): 190–201.Google Scholar The publishing record of Hungarian theologians seems to be unique by Hungarian standards only; see Welter, J. T., L'exemplum dans la littérature et didactique de moyen age (Paris-Toulouse, 1927), pp. 409, 457–458.Google Scholar

53. Szilády, , Temesvári Pelbárt élete és munkái, pp. 55–56,Google Scholar mentions editions of 1504 and 1513; Hain, Repertorium bibliographicum, no. 12561, records an Argentinae, 1487 edition.

54. For detail, see Szabó, Károly et al. , eds., Régi magyar könytár (Old Hungarian library), 3 vols. in 4 (Budapest, 1879–1898), 2:832–834.Google Scholar

55. See Kovács, , Temesvári Pelbárt, pp. 415–416;Google ScholarDám, , A Szeplötelen Fogantatás védelme Magyarországon, p. 99;Google Scholar and Mályusz, , Egyházi társadalom a középkori Magyarországon, pp. 356–357;Google Scholar and compare with Goetz, Wilhelm, “Franz von Assisi und die Entwicklung der mittelalterlichen Religiösität,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 17 (1927): 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. On Ricardus de Mediavilla (Richard of Middletown), see Friedrich Ueberweg and Geyer, Bernhard, Die patristische und scholastische Philosophie, 11th ed. (Berlin, 1928), pp. 489, 762–763.Google Scholar

57. Pelbart, , Stellarium (Venice, 1586)Google Scholar, 81b, 4:1:1; 33cd, 4:2:2.

58. Ibid., 91bc, 4:2:3. Turmel, Joseph, “Immaculate Conception,” in Encylopaedia for Religion and Ethics, ed. Hastings, James, 13 vols. (1908–1926; reprint, New York, 1961), 7, cols. 165–167.Google Scholar If the year began with 25 March, however, then the actual date ought to have been 1476; see Brandt, A. von, Werkzeug des Historikers, 2d ed. (Stuttgart, 1960), p. 38.Google Scholar

59. Pelbart, , Rosarium, pars viii (Venice, 1589), 106a–107c.Google Scholar

60. Compare Montefortino, Hieronimus de, ed., lohannis Duns Scoti Summa Theologica, 6 vols. (Rome, 1900–1904) 5:294–299,Google Scholar qu. 26, aa. 1–6, 5:310–316; and Leff, Gordon, Medieval Thought (Baltimore, 1958), pp. 194–206.Google Scholar

61. See his Sumrna Theologiae, ed. Petrus Caramello, 4 vols. (Turin-Rome, 1950–1954)Google Scholar, pars 3, qu. 27, aa. 1–2.

62. Commentarium in IV Libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi, in Moos, M. F., ed., Scriptum super Senteniis Magistri P. Lombardi, 4 vols. (Paris, 1947)Google Scholar, Sent. 1:44:1:3.

63. Pelbart, , Stellarium (Venice, 1586), 90bc,Google Scholar 4:2:2.

64. In Friedberg, Aemilius, ed., Corpus luris Canonici, rev. ed., 2 vols. (1879; reprint, Graz, 1959)Google Scholar, 2, cols. 1285–1286; or in Batthyány, Ignatius de, ed., Leges ecclesiasticae regni Hungariae, 3 vols. (Claudipoli, 1827), 3:609–629, 650–656Google Scholar (text from a Csik manuscript).

65. See Wadding, , Scriptores ordinis minorum, pp. 181, 183–184;Google Scholar and Sbaralea, J. H., Supplementum et castigatio ad scriptores trium ordinum s. Francisci, ed. Wadding, L., 2 vols. (Rome, 1906–1908), 2:316–317.Google Scholar

66. Hóman, and Szekfü, , Magyar történet, 2:600;Google ScholarHorváth, Sándor, Mulier amicta sole (Budapest, 1948), pp. 53–59;Google ScholarHorváth, János, Irodalom kezdetei, pp. 229–233.Google Scholar On Sándor Horváth, see Szennay, Andras, “Horváth Sándor, O.P.,” Vigilia 49 (1984): 596–597.Google Scholar

67. Horváth, Cyrill, “Kodexeink skolasztikus elemei,” (Scholastic features of the Hungarian codexes) Irodalomtörténeti Közlemények 42 (1932): 121, 139, 233, 315.Google ScholarHorváth, Cyrill, “Temesvári Pelbárt és kódexeink,” (Pelbart of Temesvár and Hungarian codex literature) Budapesti Szemle, parts 1, 2, 65 (1891): 383–399, 66 (1892): 21–43;Google ScholarZolnai, Nyelvemlékeink a könyvnyomtatás koráig pp. 239–250;Google ScholarMadas, Edith, “Az Érdy kódexröl,” (Some remarks on the Érdy codex) Vigilia 50 (1985): 635–638.Google Scholar

68. The material of 39 codexes has been edited and published by Volf, György, Nyelvemléktár: régi magyar kódexek és nyomtatványok (Old Hungarian codexes and books), 15 vols. (Budapest, 1874–1908)Google Scholar, passim; Timár, Kálmán, “Magyar kódex családok”, (Hungarian codex families) Irodalomtörténeti Közlemények, parts 1, 2, 37 (1927): 60–74, 38 (1928): 52–66;Google ScholarPintér, , Magyar irodalomtö;rténeti, 1:636–666.Google Scholar

69. Hóman and Szekfü, , Magyar történet, 2:647;Google ScholarBeöthy, , A magyar irodalom története, 1:169–172;Google ScholarKovács, , Temesvári Pelbárt, pp. 419–423.Google Scholar

70. King Matthias complained about the archbishop of Esztergom, and he had difficult relations with Janus Pannonius, bishop of Várad; see Monumenta Vaticana, 1:158; Bonfini, , Rerum Ungaricarum decades IV, 4:3;Google Scholar and Voigt, George, Die Wiederbelebung des classischen Alterturns, 2d ed., 2 vols. (Berlin, 1880–1881), 2:323;Google ScholarTakáts, Gábor, “Janus Pannonius,” Virgilia 13 (1948): 660–666;Google ScholarKardos, , Humanizmus kora, pp. 150–201.Google Scholar

71. Horváth, Cyrill, Régi irodalom, pp. 148–160;Google ScholarPintér, , Magyar irodalomtörténet, 1:480–492;Google ScholarHorváth, János, Irodalom megoszlása, pp. 75–103;Google ScholarBékesi, , “Magyar irók,” pp. 242–253;Google ScholarZolnay, László, Ünnep és hétköznap a középkori Budáan (Everyday life in medieval Buda), 2d ed. (Budapest, 1975), pp. 205–207.Google Scholar

72. See the Chronicles of the Reigns of Henry II and Richard 1 (1169–92), ed. Stubbs, William, 2 vols. (London, 1867), 1:285, 207;Google Scholar Henry II had kept the Hungarian envoy waiting, ibid., 1:346; Eckhardt, Andreas, ldquo;Das Ungarnbild in Europa,” Ungarische Jahrbücher 22 (1942): 152–161.Google Scholar

73. Brisits, Compare, Temesvári Pelbárt müueiböböl, pp. 3–57, 59–68;Google Scholar and Kosztolnyik, , Hungarian Kings, pp. 14–21, 92–104.Google Scholar

74. See Hermann, , A katolikus egyház története Magyarországon 1914-ig, pp. 138, 139;Google ScholarCsánki, Dezsö, “A renaissance és Mátyás király,” (King Matthias, the renaissance monarch) Budapesti Szemle 65 (1891): 393–405;Google ScholarBeöthy, , A magyar irodalom története, 1:140–142.Google ScholarZamba, L., Bibliotheca Corvina: le bibliotheca di Mattia Corvino re di Ungheria (Budapest, 1937), pp. 7–10;Google ScholarKardos, Tibor, “Deákmüveltség és magyar renaissance,” (Latin culture and Hungarian renaissance) Századok 72 (1939): 295–309.Google Scholar