Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T16:45:57.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protestant Solidarity in the Eighteenth Century: Relief Efforts of the Walloons for the Polish Reformed Churches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Kazimierz Bem
Kazimierz Bem
Affiliation:
researcher at the Faculty of Law at the Free University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The connections between the Polish Reformed Churches and the Dutch Eglises Wallonnes have never been properly examined. Apart from a few notes in articles from the beginning of the twentieth century, no attempt has been made to describe them in an integrated manner, taking into account the Walloon archives in the Bibliotheque Wallonne, as well as other Walloon sources. The aim of this publication is to examine Walloon–Polish communications in the eighteenth century, a time important for both the Walloons and the Polish Reformed. While for the former it was a period of growth and expansion, for the latter it was quite the opposite. This difference allowed the Walloon to help the Poles in their plight, strengthening the Walloon's position as supporters of endangered Protestant communities worldwide.

Type
Articles
Information
Church History , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 90 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Perk, M. A., La charité wallonne, discours d'ouverture de la Réunion wallonne, Bulletin de La Commission de L'Historie des Eglises Wallonnes, (hereafter BCHEW), (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1902), 18Google Scholar; Munier, P. J. J., Les Églises Wallonnes des Pays-Bas et les Églises soeurs d l'etranger; discours d'ouverture de La Réunion de La Haye, août 1852, BCHEW, (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1909), 68–70Google Scholar; Poujol, D. F., Histoire et influence des Eglises Wallonnes dans les Pays-Bas (Paris: Fishbacher, 1902), 319Google Scholar; Les Eglises Wallonnes des Pays-Bas (Amsterdam: Edition de l'Echo des églises wallonnes, 1963), 38.Google Scholar

2. Now at the Univeristy Library in Leiden, Netherlands.

3. Bolckmans, W. and Prevenier, W., The Promised Lands: The Low Countries under Burgundian Rule 1369–1530 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), 121–22.Google Scholar

4. Cornu, F. Le, Origine des Eglises réformées Wallonnes des Pays-Bas, 2nd ed. (Utrecht: Van Boekhoven, 1949?), 33–39.Google Scholar

5. Parker, G., The Dutch Revolt (London: Lane, 1977)Google Scholar; Israel, J. I., The Dutch Republic. Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998), 137–97.Google Scholar

6. Ibid., 205–20, 307–15.

7. Knetsch, F. R. J., The National Synod of Dordrecht, 1578, and the Position of the Walloon Churches. Acta Historiae Neerlandicae 13 (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1980), 40–50.Google Scholar

8. Munier, , Les Eglises Wallonnes des Pays-Bas, 13.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., 14.

10. Ibid., 14.

11. Ibid., 16–17.

12. For a detailed account of their legal position, see Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy i litewscy w epoce saskiej (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 1996), 19–50.Google Scholar

13. Styled “dyssydents” in Polish law.

14. Though as one author pointed out, the law only mentioned that being a member of the Lower House (Izba Poselska) was barred to Protestants. Thus, in theory, they retained the right to be nominated for senatorial positions and to sit in the Senate. However, since the last Protestant senator died in 1666, and no new nominations were made, this right was indeed illusionary. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy, 47.Google Scholar

15. For literature on the Toruń Tumult, see Salomonowicz, S., O toruńskim tumulcie z roku 1724. Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce 18 (Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1973), 161–84 (hereafter OiRwP)Google Scholar; “Sprawa Torunska z 1724 roku. Geneza i przebieg wydarzeń,” in Szkice toruńskie z XVII–XVIII wieku, ed. Salomonowicz, S. (Toruń: Tow. Nauk. w Toruniu, 1992), 77–115.Google Scholar

16. Though the Lithuanian Brethren did indeed have a considerable following among the ethnic Lithuanian peasants, it was completely dominated by the Polish nobility and clergy, as were the other two Brethren. Following World War I and the creation of a separate Lithuanian state, the Lithuanian Brethren in Poland was now predominantly Polish, and the only reason to remain separate church entities was purely historical. Yet, despite repeated unification attempts by the Warsaw consistory, these were resisted by both the Lithuanian Brethren, as well as the former Greater Poland Brethren, now in the United Church. Kosman, M., Litewska Jednota ewangelicko—refor-mowana od potowy XVII w. do 1939 r. Studia i Monografie WSP w Opolu, no. 121 (Opole: Wyzsza Szkola Pedagogiczna im. Powstanców Slaskich w Opolu, 1986).Google Scholar

17. Dworzaczkowa, J., Bracia czescy w Wielkopolsce w XVI i XVII w. (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 1997)Google Scholar; Kreigseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy, 79–88.Google Scholar

18. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy, 34–35.Google Scholar

19. Wundrack, A., “Zur Geschichte der Deutschen Ansiedlungen in ehemaligen Polen,” Historische Monatsblätter für die Provinz Posen 7 (1906): 81–86.Google Scholar

20. Konarski, S., Szlachta kalwiéska w Polsce (Warsaw: Semper, 1932), throughoutGoogle Scholar; Kwilecki, A., Ziemiaństwo Wielkopolskie (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo “Pax,” 1998), 393–406Google Scholar; Bem, K., “Żychlińscy herbu Szeliga,” Jednota 6 (1999).Google Scholar

21. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy, 84–85.Google Scholar

22. It was only in 1781, after the First Partition of Poland, and with Krokowa now in Prussia, that the Krokowski family reintroduced a Reformed minister. Ibid., 84.

23. Ibid., 57–68.

24. Ibid., 64–65; Bem, K., Zarys dziejów zboru ewangelkko-reformowanego w Piaskach Luterskich (Wielkich) koto Lublina 1563–1649–1849. OiRwP 43 (1999), 85–98.Google Scholar

25. Konarski, S., Szlachta, throughout.Google Scholar

26. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy. 60.Google Scholar

27. Ibid., 23; Darowski, R., Szczepanowice nad Dunajcem. Dzieje wsi, parafii katoiickiej i gminy kalwińskiej (Kraków: Wydział Filozoficzny Towarzystwa Jezusowego, Instytut Kultury Religijnej, 1993), 117–22.Google Scholar

28. Kriegseisen, W., “Polski kwestarz ewangelicki w Niemczech i Holandii w końcu XVIII wieku,“ in Ludzie—Kościót—Wierzenia. Studia z dziejów kultury i spoteczeństwa Europy Środkowej (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo “DIG,” 2001), 407–16.Google Scholar

29. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy. 88–116Google Scholar; Kosman, M., Litewska Jednota, throughout.Google Scholar

30. S. Konarski, Szlachta, throughout; Bem, K., “Kielmy na Żmudzi. Dzieje zboru oraz pewnej rodziny,” Jednota 3–4 (2001)Google Scholar; see also http: / / www.szlachta.org.pl/Kielmy.htm.

31. Fijałkowski, P., Polska wspólnota ewangelicko—reformowana w Królewcu. OiRwP 45 (2001), 133–53.Google Scholar

32. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy polscy, 100–107.Google Scholar

33. Klemp, A., Protestanci w dobrach prywatnych w Prusach Królewskich od drugiej połowy XVII do drugiej potowy XVIII wieku (Gdańsk: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1994)Google Scholar; Arndt, P., Geschichte der evangelisch—reformierten Geminde in Torn (Torn: n.p., 1904)Google Scholar; Kerstan, E. G., Die evangelische Kirche des Stadt—und Landfreises Ebling (Ebling: n.p., 1917).Google Scholar

34. Due to the lack of records it is difficult to point to an exact date, but the first separate treasurer of the Warsaw Reformed is known in 1712, which indicates that the congregation must have had its own elders before then. Kriegseisen, W., “Ewangelicy warszawscy w epoce saskiej,” Rocznik Warszawski 28:15–31.Google Scholar

35. Wyszomirski, T., Z przeszlości zboru protestanckiego w Wegrowie w XVII i XVIII wieku. OiRwP 4 (1959), 137–54Google Scholar; Stegner, T., Ewangelicy warszawscy 1815–1914 (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 1993), 10Google Scholar; Diehl, E., Wiadomości historyczne o cmentarzu ewangelicko—reformowanym w Warszawie (Warsaw: Konsystorz Kościoła Ewangelicko-Reformowanego w Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, 1867), 8.Google Scholar

36. Kriegseisen, W., Ewangelicy Polscy, 155–62.Google Scholar

37. For more on Mennonites in Poland, see Klzik, E., Mennonici w Gdańsku, Elblagu i na Żulawach Wiślanych w drugiej połowie XVII i XVIII wieku. Studium z dziejów małej społeczności wyznaniowej (Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Gdańskie, 1994)Google Scholar; Klassen, P., A Homeland for Strangers: an Introduction to Mennonites in Poland and Prussia (Fresno, Calif.: Center for Mennonite Bretheren Studies, 1989).Google Scholar

38. Wansink, H., Politieke wetenschappen aan de Leidse Universiteit 1575–1650 (Utrecht: n.p., 1981)Google Scholar; Israel, J. I., The Dutch Republic., 572–73Google Scholar; de Leeuw, R. and Thijssen, L., Związki między Holandią a Polską w XVI i XVII wieku. Katalog wystawy (Gdańsk: Muzeum Morskie, 1978).Google Scholar

39. Poujol, D. F., Les Eglises Wallonnes, 122–23.Google Scholar

40. Bibliotheque Wallonne (hereinafter BW), Dousa Kamer (hereinafter vD) 596, Leeuwarden Synod of 1710, Article 35.

41. Ibid.

42. BW, vD 596, Hague Synod of 1715, Article 54. Perhaps it was brought to the attention of Walloons by Dawid Cassius and Marcil Teofil Woide, who in 1714 were touring the Netherlands seeking aid for the Greater Lithuanian Brethren; see Kriegseisen, W., Polski kwestarz, 409.Google Scholar

43. BW, vD 596, Hague Synod of 1715, Article 54.

44. Ibid.

45. BW, vD 597, Leiden Synod of 1719, Article 33.

46. The king of Poland, Augustus II the Strong, was also the hereditary elector of Saxony (as Frederic Augustus II). This union continued under his son Augustus III (as Frederic Augustus III).

47. BW, vD 597, Breda Synod of 1721, Article 63.

48. For more on the Gdańsk Huguenot congregation, see Szultka, Z., “W sprawie obecności uchodźcźw religijnych z Francji w Gdańsku w XVI–XVIII wieku,” Rocznik Gdański 1007 (1987):251–60Google Scholar; Komaszyński, M., “Dziaialność kupców francuskich w Gdańsku w XVII–XVIII wieku,“ Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych 16 (1954): 239–80Google Scholar; Muret, E., Geschichte der Französische Colonie in Brandenburg-Preussen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Berliner Geminde (Berlin: Büxenstein, 1885), 211–12Google Scholar; Bern, K., Huguenots in 18th Century PolandGoogle Scholar. Refuge in a Catholic Country of Limited Tolerance. Proceedings of the Third International Huguenot Conference, Huguenot Society of South Africa, September 2002.

49. Kriegseisen, gives his name as “Pering.” Ewangelicy polscy, 143.Google Scholar

50. On Mennonite aid in that period see “Danzig Mennonite Church,” Mennonite Encyclopedia, (Hillsboro, Kans.: Mennonite Brethren Publishing House, 1956–1996), 2:9–11Google Scholar; see also “Poland,” 4:199–200, 5:707; “Lithuania,” 3:374–75; “West Prussia,” 4:20–26, 5:927–28; Gemeente Archief Amsterdam (hereinafter GAA), 379, (Archives of the Mennonite congregation in Amsterdam); On the double function of foreign aid collections, see Kriegseisen, W., “Podróże i projekty pastora Boguslawa Jelitko Kopijewicza,” in Ludzie-Kontakty—Kultura XVI–XVII w. Prace ofiarowane Marii Boguckiej, eds. Kawecki, J. and Tazbir, J. (Warsaw: Semper, 1997), 246–52.Google Scholar

51. Their mission to the Dutch synods managed to obtain for the Lithuanian Brethren a yearly donation off 526. Kriegseisen, W., Polski kwestarz, 409.Google Scholar

52. Jean Royer was a Walloon Pastor in Leeuwarden (1728–31) and in the Walloon church in The Hague (1731–79), as well as the court chaplain of the Prince William V of Orange. See van der Aa, J., Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederland (Amsterdam: B. M. Israël, 1969), 6:166–67Google Scholar; Gagnebin, M. F. H., Liste des Eglises Wallonnes des Pays-Bas et des pasteurs qui les ons desserivies, BCHEW (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1888), 3 54, 58.Google Scholar

53. Jean Brutel de La Rivière was a Walloon pastor in Vree (1695–1702), Rotterdam (1702–20), and in Amsterdam (1720–42). van der Aa, J., Biographisch Woordenboek 6:114Google Scholar; Gagnebin, M. F. H., Liste des églises, 26, 112, 333.Google Scholar

54. BW, vD 598, Maastricht Synod of 1737, Article 52.

55. Ibid.

56. According to the family history and papers, the Delprats had an office in Elblag by the end of the eighteenth century. It is not clear if the office existed there earlier, but given the extensive enterprise of the two Delprat brothers, this is possible. Furthermore, Jacques Delprat had spent some time in Berlin and even married his spouse, Cathérine Benezet, there. The Berlin Huguenots kept close contacts with the Huguenots of Gdańsk, and it is possible that Jacques Delprat had some contacts in Poland through his former colleagues and his wife's family. Delprat, M. D. H., Généalogie de la famille Delprat, BCHEW (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1888), 3:364–67Google Scholar; see also note 48.

57. BW, vD 598, Naarden Synod of 1737, Articles 42–43.

58. Ibid., Article 42.

59. Ibid., Article 43.

60. BW, vD 598, Breda Synod of 1738, Article 43.

61. BW, vD 598, Goes Synod of 1741, Article 43.

62. Under strong pressure from the Greater Poland Brethren, he declined, though he later returned to the Netherlands as a political representative of Polish Protestants (1765) before finally moving to Great Britain, where he settled down and became a well-known professor of Oriental languages. Kriegseisen, W., “Karol Godfryd Woide—polityczna geneza kariery uczonego doby Oświecenia,” in Kultura staropolska—Kultura europejska. Prace ofiarowane Januszowi Tazbirowi w siedemdziesiątą rocznicę urodzin, (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 1997), 249–57.Google Scholar

63. Algemeen Rijksarchief den Haag, Eerste Afdelig, Collectie Fagel 1673, [not paginated].

64. BW, vD 600, Rotterdam Synod of 1776, Article 32.

65. The text attached at the end of the Synod's proceedings, Ibid.; BW Actes Wallonnes (hereinafter AW) 452, “Memoire concernant les Eglises reformées dans la Royaume de Pologne par. M. H. P. Cassius, Ministre du St. Evengelie” [not dated]. On the same year the Lesser Poland organized its own collection in the Netherlands conducted by the Rev. Jan Daniel Klaudian and the nobleman Grzegorz Pakosz, though they did not seem to have contacted the Walloons. Kriegseisen, W., Polski kwestarz, 410.Google Scholar

66. BW, vD 600, Synod of Rotterdam of 1776, Article 32.

67. BW, vD 600, 's Hertogenbosch Synod of 1777, Article 44.

68. Unfortunately the letters have not survived in the Walloon archives.

69. BW, vD 600, 's Hertogenbosch Synod of 1777, Article 44.

70. This was later reaffirmed in 1784. BW vD 601, Amsterdam Synod of 1784, Article 41.

71. BW, vD 600, Kampen Synod of 1777, Article 32.

72. BW, vD 600, Tholen Synod of 1778, Article 31.

73. BW, vD 600, 601, throughout.

74. BW, AW 453. “Balance de Recette et de Debours de gestion dess dons et contributions recus en faveur des Eglise de Pologne 1777–1801” (hereinafter Balances).

75. Gemeente Archief Leiden (hereinafter GAL), Inventaris van de Archieven van de Waalse Gemeente (hereinafter WG) 535:47.

76. GAL WG 535:47 k. 497–98.

77. BW vD 601, Article 51.

78. BW, AW 453, Balances. Though if we take into account the Leiden records, that must be plainly wrong; see note 72.

79. Ibid.; The Acts of the Leiden consistory also do not give any indication to which congregations the money was sent. GAL WG 535:47, 48, 49, 59.

80. BW, vD 601, Amsterdam Synod of 1784, Article 41.

81. Kiec, O., Protestantyzm w Poznańskiem 1815–1918 (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 2001), 105.Google Scholar

82. BW vD 601, Dordrecht Synod of 1788, Article 43.

83. BW vD 601, Naarden Synod of 1787, Article 17. No such letter is in the archives of the Leiden congregation, GAL WG 535:48.

84. BW vD 601, Gouda Synod of 1789, Article 37. No such letter is in the archives of the Leiden congregation, GAL WG 535:48.

85. Kriegseisen, W., Polski kwestarz, 414–15.Google Scholar

86. BW, vD 601, Leeuwarden Synod of 1790, Article 42.

87. A copy at the end of the Synod'xss proceedings, Ibid.

88. BW, vD 601, Leeuwarden Synod of 1790, Article 42.

89. BW, AW 453, Balances.

90. GAL WG 535:48 k. 265, 269–70.

91. BW, vD 601, Arnhem Synod of 1791, Article 35.

92. Ibid., at the end of the proceedings.

93. Jan Teofil Woide, Jan Samuel Stock, Jan Daniel Mullack, Jan Daniel Kuntze. Interestingly, these names indicate that it was only elders of the German congregation that signed the letter, and the Polish did not, which seems odd, Ibid.

94. General superintendent Frederick Kloze (Leszno), Chrystian Teofil Cassius (Leszno), George Wilhelm Behr (Orzeszkowo), Jan Ludwik Cassius (Leszno), Bogusław Dawid Cassius (Leszno), Jan Samuel Cassius (Waszkowo), and Karol Bogumił Diehl (Poznań), Ibid.

95. BW, vD 601, Arnhem Synod of 1791, Articles 36.

96. BW, vD 601, Rotterdam Synod of 1793, Article 36.

97. BW, vD 601, Tholen Synod of 1795, Article 48.

98. BW, vD 601, Hague Synod of 1795, Article 42. No copy of that letter survives in the Leiden congregation papers or in the minutes of the congregation's consistory, GAL WG 535:48–49.

99. BW vD 601, Utrecht Synod of 1796, Article 40.

100. BW, vD 601, Heusden Synod of 1796, Article 40.

101. BW, vD 601–2, throughout.

102. BW, AW 453, Balances.

103. BW, vD 602, Nijmegen Synod of 1804, Article 46.

104. A bill for a letter sent to Leszno in the Dutchy of Warsaw. BW, AW 454, “Livre de Cassie du Consistoire a Leyde 1777–1822 concernant les Eglises Reformees de Pologne et de Franeker,” k. 29.

105. BW, AW 485, “Administartion des Fondes des Eglises de Pologne et de Franeker 1838–1867.”

106. On the history and doctrine of the Waldensians, see Audisio, G., The Waldensian Dissent. Persecution and Survival C.1170–C.1570 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

107. BW vD 598, Article 44; Poujol, D. F., Les Eglises Wallonnes., 294–96.Google Scholar

108. BW vD 598–602, throughout; Poujol, D. F., Les Eglises Wallonnes., 296Google Scholar; Rieu, W. N. du, Essai bibliographicjue concernant tout ce qui a parus dans les Pays-Bas, au suject et en faveur des Vaudois, BCHEW, (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1890), 105–38.Google Scholar

109. Poujol, D. F., Les Eglises Wallonnes., 314–15.Google Scholar

110. Ibid., 393–94.

111. This is a general observation. The Dutch Mennonite aid to their Polish brothers and sisters in faith is still waiting for its historian, and the material is vast: see GAA 565; also see note 50.

112. On the help of the Dutch Reformed Church to the Polish, see GAA 379; W. Kriegseisen, Ewangelicy polscy, throughout.

113. See note 1.