Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:59:57.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bishops and Puritans in Early Jacobean England: A Perspective on Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Ogbu U. Kalu
Ogbu U. Kalu
Affiliation:
Mr. Kalu is lecturer in reliqion inthe University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

King James I's reign was a landmark in the history of the Anglican Church. His religious settlement included the codification of the canons which gave definition and cohesion to the church and reformed her adminstrative machinery. But this touched off a pamphlet war as puritan propaganda sought to force a reappraisal of the settlement. They alleged that bishops harassed and deprived hard-working, conscientious, loyal clergymen who merely rejected the ceremonies. The bishops employed young apologists to discredit the opposition and plead for conformity. They claimed that only thirty to sixty puritan clerics were deprived.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 469 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Usher, Roland G., The Pilgrims and Their History (New York: Macmillan Co., 1918), pp. 24–25Google Scholar; idem, The Reconstruction of the English Church, 2 Vols. (London and New York: D. Appleton Co., 1910).Google Scholar

2. Babbage, Stuart P., Puritanism and Richard Bancroft (London: SPCK, 1962), p. 217.Google Scholar

3. The evidence for the existence of such a committee is the Sloane MS, 271, British Museum, London.

4. See Kalu, Ogbu U., “The Jacobean Church and Essex Puritans,” pt. 2 (Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto, 1972),Google Scholar for a discussion of this topic. Cf. Jenkins, C. (ed.), The Act Book of the Archdeacon of Taunton, vol. 43 (Somerset Record Society, 1928)Google Scholar; Emmison, F. G. (ed.), Abstracts of the Act Book of the Archdeacon of Huntingdon's Court, vol 8 (East Hertfordshire Archeological Society, 1930)Google Scholar; Johnstone, Henry (ed.), Churchwarden's Presentments, Archdeaconry of Chichester, 1621–70, vol 49, pt. 1 (Sussex Record Society, 1947).Google Scholar

5. Greater London Record Office (hereafter GLRO), DL/C/336–43 Vicar General's Books.

6. Harvey, R., “The Problem of Social-Political Obligation for the Church of England in the 17th Centutry”, Church History 40 (1971): 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Owen, Gareth H., “The Episcopal Visitation: Its Limits and Limitations in Elizabethan London,” Journal of EcclesiasLical History 40 (1960): 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. The distinction is deliberately drawn between a court whose routine complied with canonical requirements but which failed to be effective in ferreting out nonconformists.

9. An operational definition of “puritans” includes those who wanted a church which was more spiritually alert, evangelical, extremely protestant, and bereft of ceremonies with Roman Catholic notions. Their cases could be sifted out of various considerations: (1) their plea to charge(s) of nonconformity; (2) evidence from extra-court sources, e.g., wills, assize files, parish registers, etc.; (3) the type of offence; (4) testimonies of others, puritans and parish officials; (5) frequent arraignment. See Kalu, Ogbu U., “Who is a Puritans,” “The Jacobean Church and Essex Puritans,” Appendix 5 (Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto, 1972).Google Scholar

10. On Vaughan, see Dictionary of National Biography, s.v.; An Abridgement of that Booke… Lincoln Diocese (London, 1605).Google Scholar

11. Jacobs, Henry, A Christian and Modest Offer (London, 1606)Google Scholar; Lambeth Palace Library (hereafter LPL), MS 933, no. 11.

12. On Ravis see DNB; LPL, MS 933 no. 41; Bodl. Oxford, Tanner MS 282.

13. DNB; Welsby, Paul A., Abbot, George, The Unwanted Archbishop (London: SPCK, 1962)Google Scholar; Trevor-Roper, Hugh, “James I and His Bishops,” Histoncal Essays (NewYork, 1957), pp. 130Google Scholar ff; LPL, , Abbot's Register, 1:224–292.Google Scholar

14. Benfield, Sebastian, A Sermon Preached at Wotton Under Edge in the Diocese Gloucester (Oxford, 1613)Google Scholar; Gardiner, Samuel, A Dialogue Between Irsnseus and Antimachus (London, 1605)Google Scholar; Abbot, George, Cheapside Cross Censured and Condemned (London, 1614).Google Scholar

15. Seaver, Paul, The Puritan Lectureships (California: Stanford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

16. However, it is possible that some cases reached the Consistory Court earlier and are contained in GLRO, DL/C/618, Secundus Liber Actorum in negotiis pro Com. Essex et parte Herts. This volume is in an unfit condition for public examination.

17. GRLO, DL/C/304 f. 128v.

18. For Lynce, GLRO, DL/C/304 f. 354; for others, see DL/C/305 f. 206v, 189, 178, 196v, 211 in that order.

19. GLRO, DL/305 f. 158, 237.

20. Suspended Acquitted No Decision Arthur Grames Ralph Hawden Derrick Heldon William Negaa William Kettle Richard Car John Gawden Ezekiel Culverwell

John Huckles John Eaton Steven Beamont John Gulson Jeffrey Josselin

21. GLRO, DL/C/338 f. 203v.

22. Dr. Williams's Library, London (hereafter DWI1), Baxter MS 61.13.17.

23. SirHarrington, John, A Briefe Viewe of the State of the Church of England (London, 1608 [1653 edition]), pp. 29–31.Google Scholar

24. It is possible that some cases concerning laymen may be contained In GLRO, DL/C/307 (March 1607–1608-May 1609). This volume is in an unfit condition for public use.

25. This interrogation exposed “intruders”like John William of Nettleswell. Guildhall, London, MS 9537/10 f. 13.

26. Ibid., f. 16.

27. John Rogers, DL/O/305 f. 317; Richard Rogers, DL/C/306 f. 18v; George Chope, ibid., 132v; Negus, Culverwell, Rusticen, ibid., f. 31v.

28. Winthrop Papers (Massachusetts Historical Association, 1929), vol. 1, pp. 155, 229–30, 234–5, 334.Google Scholar

29. DWL, Morrice MS 1. 589. 10–12 and Baxter MS 61. 13. 17.

30. GLRO, DL/C/309 f. 50v.

31. Essex Record Office, Chermsford (hereafter ERO), (Joehester Gaol List, Assize Files 35/51A/ f. 11 7 Jas I.

32. ERO, Assize Files 35/53A/T, f. 10; 35/54/H f. 38, 35/56/H f. 101, 35/45/T f. 35. Abbot confessed his failure with separatists in a letter to the Bishop of Norwich in 1612. See The Registrum Vagum of Anthony Harrison (Norfolk Record Society, 1964), vol 32 pt. 2, p. 267.Google Scholar

33. Murriel, curate of Cold Norton, who did not read the Book of Constitution, may not have been a puritan.

34. See Table 11A.

35. Elton, Geoffrey R., Tudor Constitution (Cambridge, 1966), p. 125Google Scholar; Kenyon, John P., The Stuarts (London: B. T. Batsford Ltd., 1958), p. 22Google Scholar; McGrath, Patrick, Papists and Puritans Under Elizabeth I (London: Blandford Press, 1967), pp. 337 ffGoogle Scholar; Clark, Henry W., History of Nonconformity, 2 vols. (London, 1911–1912), 1:252.Google Scholar

36. Hacket, John, Sernia Reserata (London, 1692), pt. 2, pp. 45 ff.Google Scholar

37. DWL, Quick MS, “The Life of … Samuel Hieron of Modbury,”recounts how the bishop's fear for his popularity saved Hieron.

38. See the conversation between the Old Protestant and the New Formalist In Hieron, Samuel A., A Short Dialogue (London, 1605)Google Scholar; Bradshaw, William, A myld and just defence of certyne argument, (London, 1606)Google Scholar; Powell, Gabriel, A Rejoynder unto the Mild Defence (London, n.d.).Google Scholar