Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:14:17.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Screening of congenital heart disease in the second trimester of pregnancy: current knowledge and new perspectives to the clinical practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

Luciane Alves Rocha ,
Edward Araujo Júnior ,
Liliam Cristine Rolo ,
Fernanda Silveira Bello Barros ,
Karina Peres Silva ,
Luis Henrique Martinez ,
Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza  and
Antonio Fernandes Moron
Luciane Alves Rocha
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Edward Araujo Júnior*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Liliam Cristine Rolo
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Fernanda Silveira Bello Barros
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Karina Peres Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Luis Henrique Martinez
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Antonio Fernandes Moron
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Cardiology Unit, São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence to: Prof E. Araujo Júnior, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Carlos Weber, 956 apto. 113 Visage, Alto da Lapa, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05303-000, Brazil. Tel/Fax: +55 11 37965944; E-mail: araujojred@terra.com.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Congenital heart diseases are common in foetuses, with an incidence greater than six times that of chromosomal abnormalities; however, experts in cardiac anatomy have evaluated only the foetuses of pregnant women with increased risk for congenital heart disease. Over the years, it has become clear that congenital heart disease occur in foetuses of low-risk women. In the mid-1980s, a proposal to expand the assessment of cardiac anatomy was presented to obstetricians in order to improve prenatal screening. With the aim to systematise and improve the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in foetuses, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology established an ultrasound heart examination guideline. In this review, we have described the important features of this guideline and discussed the applications of this tool in clinical practice.

Methods

We performed a literature search of the National Library of Medicine for publications released between 2000 and 2012; we used search terms pertinent to congenital heart disease, such as foetal echocardiography, foetal heart and cardiac screening examination.

Results

The guidelines serve as a standard and help to systematise the screening for congenital heart diseases, but we think that some topics may be added to design the most appropriate screening method. However, we cannot expand the topics to be evaluated in this examination without good training of sonographers who undergo this screening.

Conclusion

Although the screening standardisation is a good tool to be used in day-to-day practice, the increment of aortic and ductal archs and colour Doppler to heart screening could be useful to detect further cardiac defects.

Keywords

Screeningcongenital heart diseaseechocardiographyguidelines
Type
Review Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 388 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hoffman, JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol 1995; 16: 155–165.Google Scholar
2. Hoffman, JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: I. Postnatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol 1995; 16: 103–113.Google Scholar
3. Friedberg, MK, Silverman, NH, Moon-Grady, AJ, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2009; 155: 26–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Yu, Z, Xi, Y, Ding, W, et al. Congenital heart disease in a Chinese hospital: pre- and postnatal detection, incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes. Pediatr Int 2011; 53: 1059–1065.Google Scholar
5. Ozkutlu, S, Akça, T, Kafali, G, Beksaç, S. The results of fetal echocardiography in a tertiary center and comparison of low- and high-risk pregnancies for fetal congenital heart defects. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2010; 10: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lee, JE, Jung, KL, Kim, SE, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: trends in pregnancy termination rate, and perinatal and 1-year infant mortalities in Korea between 1994 and 2005. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36: 474–478.Google Scholar
7. Galindo, A, Herraiz, I, Escribano, D, Lora, D, Melchor, JC, de la Cruz, J. Prenatal detection of congenital heart defects: a survey on clinical practice in Spain. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 287–295.Google Scholar
8. Clur, SA, Van Brussel, PM, Mathijssen, IB, Pajkrt, E, Ottenkamp, J, Bilardo, CM. Audit of 10 years of referrals for fetal echocardiography. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1134–1140.Google Scholar
9. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 107–113.Google Scholar
10. Lee, W, Allan, L, Carvalho, JS, et al. ISUOG consensus statement: what constitutes a fetal echocardiogram? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 239–242.Google Scholar
11. Allan, L, Hornberger, L, Sharland, G. Textbook of fetal cardiology. Greenwich Medical Media, London, 2000: 3–13.Google Scholar
12. Allan, LD, Tynan, M, Campbell, S, Wilkinson, JL, Andersen, RH. Echocardiographic and anatomical correlates in the fetus. Br Heart J 1980; 44: 444–451.Google Scholar
13. Sahn, DJ, Lange, LW, Allen, HD, et al. Quantitative real-time cross-sectional echocardiography in the development of normal human fetus and newborn. Circulation 1980; 62: 588–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Kleinman, CS, Donnerstein, RL, DeVore, GR, et al. Fetal echocardiography for evaluation of in utero congestive heart failure. New Engl J Med 1982; 306: 568–575.Google Scholar
15. Viñals, F, Poblete, P, Giuliano, A. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): a new tool for the prenatal screening of congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 388–394.Google Scholar
16. Gonçalves, LF, Lee, W, Chaiworapongsa, T, et al. Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart with spatiotemporal image correlation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1792–1801.Google Scholar
17. DeVore, GR, Falkensammer, P, Sklansky, MS, Platt, LD. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 380–387.Google Scholar
18. Allan, L. Prenatal diagnosis of structural cardiac defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145C: 73–76.Google Scholar
19. Carvalho, JS, Mavrides, E, Shinebourne, EA, Campbell, S, Thilaganathan, B. Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects. Heart 2002; 88: 387–391.Google Scholar
20. Ferencz, C, Rubin, JD, McCarter, RJ, et al. Congenital heart disease: prevalence at live birth. The Baltimore–Washington infant study. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 31–36.Google Scholar
21. Meberg, A, Otterstad, JE, Froland, G, Lindberg, H, Sorland, SJ. Outcome of congenital heart defects – a population-based study. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 1344–1351.Google Scholar
22. Cuneo, BF, Curran, LF, Davis, N, Elrad, H. Trends in prenatal diagnosis of critical cardiac defects in an integrated obstetric and pediatric cardiac imaging center. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 674–678.Google Scholar
23. Rosano, A, Botto, LD, Botting, B, Mastroiacovo, P. Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 660–666.Google Scholar
24. Eggebo, TM, Heien, C, Berget, M, Ellingsen, CL. Routine use of color Doppler in fetal heart scanning in a low-risk population. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012; 2012: 496935.Google Scholar
25. Huhta, JC, Smallhorn, JF, Macartney, FJ. Two dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of situs. Br Heart J 1982; 48: 97–108.Google Scholar
26. Kirk, JS, Riggs, TW, Comstock, CH, Lee, W, Yang, SS, Weinhouse, E. Prenatal screening for cardiac anomalies: the value of routine addition of the aortic root to the four-chamber view. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 427–431.Google Scholar
27. Vinals, F, Heredia, F, Giuliano, A. The role of the three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in the diagnosis of congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 358–367.Google Scholar
28. Yagel, S, Arbel, R, Anteby, EY, Raveh, D, Achiron, R. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 340–345.Google Scholar
29. Vettraino, IM, Lee, W, Bronsteen, RA, Comstock, CH. Sonographic evaluation of the ventricular cardiac outflow tracts. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 566.Google Scholar
30. Xu, Y, Hu, YL, Gu, Y, Yang, Y, Dai, CY. Importance of “Guidelines for performing fetal cardiac scan” in prenatal screening for fetal congenital heart disease. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2009; 44: 103–107.Google Scholar
31. Hikoro, M, Mats, M, Michael, R, Hana, J, Helena, MG Morphological and physiological predictors of fetal aortic coarctation. Circulation 2000; 118: 1793–1801.Google Scholar
32. Koenig, P, Hijazi, ZM, Zimmerman, F. Essential pediatric cardiology. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, 2004: 131–136.Google Scholar
33. Chaoui, R, McEwing, R. Three cross-sectional planes for fetal color Doppler echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 81–93.Google Scholar
34. Head, CEG, Jowett, VC, Sharland, GK, Simpson, JM. Timing of presentation and postnatal outcome of infants suspected of having coarctation of the aorta during fetal life. Heart 2005; 91: 1070–1074.Google Scholar
35. Hornberger, LK, Sahn, DJ, Kleinman, CS, Copel, J, Silverman, NH. Antenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta: a multicenter experience. Pediatric Cardiol 1994; 23: 417–423.Google Scholar
36. Allan, LD, Chita, SK, Anderson, RH, Fagg, N, Crawford, TDC, Tynan, M. Coarctation ofthe aorta in prenatal life: an echocardiographic, anatomical, and functional study. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 356–360.Google Scholar
37. Sharland, GK, Chan, KY, Allan, LD. Coarctation ofthe aorta: difficulties in prenatal diagnosis. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 70–75.Google Scholar
38. Vinãls, F, Mandujano, L, Vargas, G, Giuliano, A. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease using four-dimensional spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) telemedicine via an internet link: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 25–31.Google Scholar
39. Gonçalves, LF, Romero, R, Espinoza, J, et al. Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart using color Doppler spatiotemporal image correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 473–481.Google Scholar
40. Gonçalves, LF, Espinoza, J, Lee, W, Mazor, M, Romero, R. Three- and four-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic and ductal arches using inversion mode: a new rendering algorithm for visualization of fluid-filled anatomical structures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 696–698.Google Scholar
41. Gonçalves, LF, Espinoza, J, Lee, W, et al. A new approach to fetal echocardiography: digital casts of the fetal cardiac chambers and great vessels for detection of congenital heart disease. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 415–424.Google Scholar
42. Espinoza, J, Gonçalves, LF, Lee, W, Mazor, M, Romero, R. A novel method to improve prenatal venous connections using three- and four-dimensional ultrasonography and “inversion mode”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 428–434.Google Scholar
43. Ghi, T, Cera, E, Segata, M, Michelacci, L, Pilu, G, Pelusi, G. Inversion mode spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) echocardiography in three-dimensional rendering of fetal ventricular septal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 679–686.Google Scholar
44. Pooh, PK, Korai, A. B-flow and B-flow spatio-temporal image correlation in visualizing fetal cardiac blood flow. Croat Med J 2005; 46: 808–811.Google ScholarPubMed
45. Garne, E, Berghold, A, Johnson, Z, Stoll, C. Different policies on prenatal ultrasound screening programmes and induced abortions explain regional variations in infant mortality with congenital malformations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 153–157.Google Scholar