Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:45:30.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Languaging in Creating Zones of Proximal Development (ZPDs): A Long-Term Care Resident Interacts with a Researcher*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Sharon Lapkin ,
Merrill Swain  and
Paula Psyllakis
Sharon Lapkin*
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto
Merrill Swain
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto
Paula Psyllakis
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Sharon Lapkin, Ph.D., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6 (sharon.lapkin@utoronto.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the question: What is the role of languaging – the shaping and organizing of higher mental processes through language – in emerging zones of proximal development (ZPDs) co-created by two adults? The two adults are a resident in a long-term care facility (Mike) and a researcher. A ZPD is an ongoing cognitive/affective activity in which learning and development occur as participants interact. This process is mediated by languaging. Through a microgenetic analysis of selected representative excerpts from 11 one-on-one sessions, we illustrate how the interactions between Mike and the researcher create a positive affective context which affords multiple opportunities for ZPDs to emerge. During the emergent ZPDs, we observe how languaging brings together the cognitive and affective components essential for the participant’s continued development. Over time, Mike reclaims lost expertise and takes on new complex cognitive challenges. Outcomes for Mike include both cognitive development and enhanced self-esteem.

Résumé

“Cet article traite de la question: Quel est le rôle du <languaging> (la mise en mots) – l’élaboration et l’organisation des processus mentaux supérieures par la langue – dans les zones émergents de développement proximales (ZDPs) co-crée par deux adultes ? » Les deux adultes sont Mike, un résident dans un établissement de soins de longue durée, et un chercheur. Un zone proximale de développement (ZPD) est un processus continu cognitive/affective dans lequel l’apprentissage et le développement se produisent quand les participants interagissent. Ce processus est medié par le langage. Grâce à une analyse microgénétique d’extraits representatifs selectionnés à partir de 11 seances, nous illustrons comment les interactions entre Mike et le chercheur ont crée un contexte affectif et positif qui offre des possibilités multiples de ZDPs à émerger. Comme les ZDPs émergent, nous observons comment le <languaging> rassemble les composantes cognitives et affectives essentielles afin que le développement du participant peut continuer. Au fil du temps, Mike récupère l’expertise perdu et entreprend de nouveaux défis cognitivement complexes. Les résultats pour Mike comprennent à la fois le développement cognitif et un meilleur amour-propre.

Keywords

(mise en mots)communicationpersonnes âgéeszone proximale de développementaffect positifamélioration des fonctions cognitiveslanguagingcommunicationolder adultszone of proximal developmentpositive affectcognitive improvement
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 477 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was made possible by a grant to Merrill Swain and Sharon Lapkin from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (No. 410-04-2099). We are grateful to the participant and staff of the long-term care facility for their collaboration. We also wish to acknowledge, with thanks, feedback on earlier drafts of this article from Jim Lantolf, Iryna Lenchuk, Kyoko Motobayashi, Linda Steinman, and Nancy Wise.

References

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, K., Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (in press). Examining the quality of measures of change in cognition and affect for older adults: Two case studies. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(2).Google Scholar
Candlin, C.N., & Candlin, S. (2003). Health care communication: A problematic site for applied linguistics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 134–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattan, M., White, M., Bond, J., & Learmouth, A. (2005). Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: A systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing and Society, 25, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1991). Language, society and the elderly discourse, identify and ageing. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J.P. & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 6, New Series, Part 2: The ethnography of communication, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B.F. (1981). Foreigner talk, baby talk, native talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 19–39.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. (1994). Elderspeak: Speech accommodations to older adults. Aging and Cognition, 1, 17–28.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Ahmed, M. (1989). Psycholinguistic perspectives on interlanguage variation: A Vygotskian analysis. In Gass, S.M., Selinker, L., & Preston, D. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 93–108). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lenchuk, I., & Swain, M. (2010). Alise’s small stories: Indices of identity construction and of resistance to the discourse of cognitive impairment. Language Policy, 9, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Petrick-Steward, E. (1995). Beginning writers in the zone of proximal development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language and Communication, 6(1/2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Meredith, S.D., MacLean, M.J., & Orange, J.B. (1995). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41, 89–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In Byrnes, H. (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2010). Talking it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batstone, R. (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on second language learning and use (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (forthcoming). Sociocultural theory and second language education: An introduction through narratives. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2008). Evidence of cognitive change: Languaging with an older adult. Paper presented at the AAAL conferenceWashington, DC.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Reiber, R.W. & Carton, A.S. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J.V., & Hickman, M. (1987). Problem-solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In Hickman, M. (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, K. (2006). Improving outcomes of nursing home interactions. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed