Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:10:28.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Home and Community-Based Care: The U.S. Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Robert F. Clark
Robert F. Clark
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1985 there were about 5.5 million functionally disabled elderly persons (65 +) in the United States (U.S.) living in the community and an additional 1.3 million in nursing homes. By 2020, these figures are expected to almost double to 10.1 million and 2.5 million respectively. The long-term care system (LTC) in the U.S. is large and complex. Fundamentally, it consists of: (a) informal care, provided voluntarily by one's family, friends, neighbours, and community organizations; (b) home and community based care, covering formal (paid) services provided in one's own home or other community based settings; and (c) nursing homes, which provide specialized medical, nursing, and social services in an institutional setting. Home and community based care includes a variety of services and financing streams, including (a) Medicare home health care, (b) Medicaid home health services, (c) Medicaid home- and community-based services, (d) programs and services under the Older Americans Act, (e) state sponsored social services funded by the Social Services Block Grant, (f) Supplemental Security Income payments, and (g) a range of supportive housing arrangements. Data on the LTC system are available from several key sources: national surveys, administrative records, inventories, state and local data systems, and demonstration programs. The LTC system remains decentralized. The frail elderly want dignity and independence in the latter years, plus access to needed services and an acceptable quality of life. In policy terms, their caregivers and the taxpaying public continue to struggle to find the appropriate mix of public and private support to meet the needs of the LTC population.

Résumé

En 1985, il y avait quelque 5, 5 millions d'aînés souffrant d'un handicap fonctionnel, âgés de 65 ans ou plus qui vivaient dans la communauté, plus 1,3 million d'entre eux qui résidaient dans des centres d'hébergement. D'ici l'an 2020, ces chiffres devraient pratiquement doubler, passant respectivement à 10,1 millions et à 2.5 millions. Le système des soins de longue durée aux États-Unis est vaste et complexe. Il comprend essentiellement: (a) les simples soins prodigués bénévolement par un membre de la famille, par des amis, par des voisins et par des organismes communautaires; (b) les soins communautaires et les soins à domicile, comprenant les services (payés) officiellement donnés au domicile des bénéficiaires ou dans des établissements communautaires; (c) les services médicaux, infirmiers et sociaux spécialisés en milieu institutionnel fournis par les centres d'hébergement. Les soins à domicile et les soins communautaires comprenent une diversité de services et de sources de financement, dont: (1) les soins de santé à domicile de Medicare; (2) les services de santé à domicile de Medicaid; (3) les services à domicile et les services communautaires de Medicaid; (4) les programmes et les services en vertu du Older Americans Act; (5) les services sociaux parrainés par chaque état et financés par le Social Services Block Grant (SSBG); (6) les indemnités de supplément de revenu (SSI); (7) un éventail de logements avec services de soutien. Les données sur le système de soins de longue durée proviennent de diverses sources dont les principales sont les enquêtes nationales, les dossiers administratifs, les inventaires, les systèmes de données des états et les systèmes de données locales ainsi que les programmes-pilotes. Le système de soins de longue durée est encore largement décentralisé. Les aînés fragiles souhaitent, dans leurs vieux jours, vivre dans la dignité et l'autonomie; ils désirent aussi avoir accès aux services dont ils ont besoin et jouir d'une bonne qualité de vie. En ce qui a trait aux mesures à envisager, leurs soignants et les contribuables poursuivent leur recherche du juste équilibre entre le soutien public et le soutient privé qui permettra de répondre aux besoins de la population exigeant des soins de longue durée.

Keywords

Long-term CareHome and Community Based CareMedicareMedicaidOlder Americans ActHome Health Care.Soins de longue duréesoins à domicile et soins communautairesMedicaireMedicaidOlder Americans Actsoins de santé à domicile.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 15 , Issue S1 , Automne/Fall 1996 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging (AAHSA) and Ernst & Young. (1991). Continuing care retirement communities: An industry in action. Washington, DC: AAHSA.Google Scholar
Clark, R.F., Turek-Brezina, J., Chu, C.W., & Hawes, C. (1994, April 11). Licensed board and care homes: Preliminary findings from the 1991 National Health Provider Inventory. Revised version of paper presented at 1992 annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. (1988). Medicaid source book: Background data and analysis. A report prepared for the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Gilford, D. (Ed.). (1988). The aging population in the twenty-first century: Statistics for health policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Kane, R.A., & Wilson, K.B. (1993). Assisted living in the United States: A new paradigm for residential care for frail older persons? Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.Google Scholar
Manton, K. (1989). Epidemiological, demographic and social correlates of disability among the elderly. The Milbank Quarterly, 67(2,1), 13–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (1996, May). Servicing elders at risk: National evaluation of the elderly nutrition programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Rivlin, A.M., Wiener, J.M., Hanley, R.J., & Spence, D.A. (1987). Caring for the disabled elderly: Who will pay? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Spiegel, A.D. (1987). Home health care. Owings Mills, MD: Rynd Communications.Google Scholar
Struyk, R., Page, D.B., Newman, S., Carroll, M., Ueno, M., Cohen, B., & Wright, P. (1989, June). Providing supportive services to the frail elderly in federally assisted housing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1994). Cost estimates for the long-term care provisions of the health security act. Washington, DC: USDHHS.Google Scholar
U.S. Health Care Financing Administration. (1995). Health care financing review: Medicine and medical statistical supplement, 1995. Baltimore, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Health Care Financing Administration.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. (1990, June 5). Overview ofentitlement programs -1990 green book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. (1994, July 15). Overview of entitlement programs — 1994 green book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Special Committee on Aging. (1991, March 22). Developments in aging: 1990, Volume 2 — Appendices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Van Nostrand, J.F. (1996). The focus of long-term care in the United States: Nursing home care, Canadian Journal on Aging, 15(suppl. 1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J.M., Hanley, R.J., Clark, R., & Van Nostrand, J.F. (1990). Measuring the activities of daily living: Comparisons across national surveys. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45(6), S229–S237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed