Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:11:31.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Constituency Associations and the Service, Policy and Symbolic Responsiveness of Canadian Members of Parliament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Royce Koop
Royce Koop*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
Royce Koop, Department of Political Studies, University of Manitoba, 532 Fletcher Argue, Winnipeg MB, R3T 5V5, royce.koop@ad.umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Effective representation requires that representatives learn of the needs and preferences of their constituents and communicate their representative accomplishments back to those constituents. This article demonstrates how Canadian political parties, specifically their constituency associations in the ridings, assist MPs in their representative functions by facilitating communication between MPs and constituents. Representatives of local “sectors” on constituency association executives provide a means for focused communication between MPs and constituents. The result is that constituency associations enhance the service, policy and symbolic responsiveness of many MPs in their ridings. This article therefore elucidates the largely unrecognized role of Canadian parties' constituency organizations as important democratic and representational actors in the ridings.

Résumé. Pour être efficace, il faut que les élus (1) comprennent les besoins et les préférences de leurs électeurs et (2) communiquent leurs activités en tant que parlementaires. Cet article montre à quel point les partis politiques canadiens, surtout les comités au niveau des comtés individuels, sont importants comme instrument pour réaliser ces tâches. Les comités organisent la communication entre un député et les groupes locaux qui s'intéressent au sujet en question. Pour résumer, les comités de militants fournit un element crucial au succès d'un politicien dans son comté. C'est une dimension de l'activité que les politiologues ont tendance à ignorer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 359 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Dobrzynska, Agnieszka, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2003. “Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36: 657–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. K. 1991. Canadian Political Parties in the Constituencies. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. K. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 723–45.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth, Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2000. Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R.K. and Cross, William. 2010. “Political Parties and the Practice of Brokerage Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics, ed. Courtney, John C. and Smith, David E.. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. K. and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Alistair. 2004. “The Continued Relevance of Local Parties in Representative Democracies.” Politics 24: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William. 2007. “Policy Study and Development in Canada's Political Parties.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Howlett, Michael and Laycock, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. 2007. Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Docherty, David C. 1997. Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2: 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm Edwin. 1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2010. “Professionalism, Sociability, and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43: 893–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2011. Grassroots Liberals: Organizing for Local and National Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65: 682–93.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Peter. 2006. “How to Organize an Effective Constituency Office.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 29: 9–12.Google Scholar
Malloy, Jonathan. 2003. “High Discipline, Low Cohesion? The Uncertain Patterns of Canadian Parliamentary Party Groups.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 9: 116–29.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mays, Nicholas and Pope, Catherine. 2000. “Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research.” British Medical Journal 320: 50–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMenemy, John. 1989. “Getting to Know the Parties by the Company We Keep: Local Sources of Party Imagery.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tanguay, A. Brian. Toronto: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard G. and Mancuso, Maureen. 1995. “Ties that Bind: Members and Their Constituencies.” In Introductory Readings in Canadian Government and Politics, ed. Krause, Robert M. and Wagenberg, R.H.. Toronto: Copp Clark.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, Margarete. 1994. “Focus on Qualitative Methods: The Use of Quotes in Qualitative Research.” Research in Nursing Health 17: 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, Anthony M. 1999. Parties, Candidates and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1996. Parties and Their Members: Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Mario Luis. 2009. “How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10: 5–38.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael A. 2003. Bringing Representation Home: State Legislators among Their Constituencies. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, Penner, Erin and Blidook, Kelly. 2009. “Constituency Influence in Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42: 563–91.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul and Seyd, Patrick. 2003. “How to Win a Landslide by Really Trying: The Effects of Local Campaigning on Voting in the 1997 British General Election.” Electoral Studies 22: 301–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 2007. “Cycles and Brokerage: Canadian Parties as Mobilizers of Interest.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tanguay, A. Brian. Peterborough ON: Broadview.Google Scholar