Last updated 20/06/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
1 Except where noted, all references below to this work are to the English translation, The Principle of Federation by P.-J. Proudhon (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979),Google Scholar cited as The Principle.
2 The Principle, 5.
3 O'Malley, Joseph (ed.), Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 29–30Google Scholar.
4 The German Ideology (English translation; New York: International, 1979), 86Google Scholar.
5 The Principle, 16.
6 Ibid., 58.
7 Ibid., 49.
8 See, for example, Bernstein, Eduard, Evolutionary Socialism (English translation; New York: Schocken, 1961), 157–59Google Scholar.
9 Lenin, V. I., The Slate and Revolution (English translation; Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973), 60–64Google Scholar.
10 See especially Connolly, William, “Note on Freedom under Socialism,” Political Theory 5 (1977), 468CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 The Principle, 49.
12 German Ideology, 86.
13 In The Democratic and the Authoritarian State (New York: Free Press, 1957), 216–32Google Scholar.
14 Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Boston: Little, Brown, 1964), 139–45Google Scholar.
15 In Benewick, Robert et al. (eds.). Knowledge and Belief in Politics (London: Allen & Unwin, 1973), 151–76Google Scholar.
16 Aron, Raymond, An Essay on Freedom (New York: World Publishing, 1970), 47Google Scholar.
17 King, “Against Federalism,” 161.
18 ”Theory of the Federal State,” 161.
19 The Principle, 40.
20 Ibid., 48.
21 Ibid., 20.
22 De 'esprit des his, Vol. 1 (Paris: Gamier,. 1961), 138Google Scholar (IX.i.)
23 The Principle, 51.
24 Ibid., 31.
25 Ibid., 32.
26 Ibid., 60.
27 Ibid., 47–48, 68.
28 Ibid., 14–16.
29 Ibid., 30.
30 See Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975)Google Scholar.
31 The Principle, 78.
32 Ibid., 66.
33 Ibid., 17, 51.
34 Ibid., 16,33.
35 Idée général de la Révolution au XIXe siècle (Paris: Internationale, 1851) , IIGoogle Scholar.
36 The Principle, 78–81.
37 See especially On Revolution (New York: Viking, 1963), 217–85Google Scholar.
38 The Principle, 22.
39 Ibid., 62.
40 Ibid., 34.
41 Ibid., 61.
42 Ibid., 28.
43 Du Principe federatif (Paris: Dentu, 1863) 313Google Scholar; not included in English translation.
44 Compare, however, Hoffmann's, Stanley view, in Maass, A. (ed.), Area and Power (Glencoe: Free Press, 1959), 133Google Scholar, where the economic is treated as primary, the political as a means.
45 For this distinction see Pocock's, J. G. A. discussion in Parel, Anthony and Flanagan, Thomas (eds.), Theories of Property (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1979)Google Scholar.
46 The Principle, 59.
47 Ibid., 49.
48 Ibid., 47.
49 Macpherson, Leviathan C. B. (ed.) (Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), 266–68Google Scholar.
50 Riker, Federalism, 141–44.
51 In Four Essays on Liberty (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), 118–72Google Scholar.
52 MacCallum, Gerald C., “Negative and Positive Freedom,” in Laslett, Peter et al. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society (4th series; Oxford: Blackwell, 1972), 174–93Google Scholar. For a comment on this view, see Kocis, Robert A., “Reason, Development and the Conflict of Human Ends,” American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
53 For a sustained analysis of the themes of this paragraph, see Aron, Essay on Freedom, Parts 2 and 4.
54 Ibid., 157.
55 Ibid.
56 De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières (new ed.; Paris: Riviere, 1924), 207Google Scholar.
57 Masters, Roger D.(ed-), “Political Economy,” in On the Social Contract (New York: St. Martin's, 1978), 213Google Scholar.
58 See for example The Principle, 61, where it is suggested (though not required) that the federal centre be composed of delegates from provincial governments.
59 See Barnard, F. M. and Vernon, R. A., “Socialist Pluralism and Pluralist Socialism,” Political Studies 25 (1977), 474–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for the view that the pluralization of socialist regimes may require the abandonment of the “withering away” thesis.
