Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:23:43.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adapting to Changing Contexts of Choice: The Nation-Building Strategies of Unrecognized Silesians and Rusyns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2008

Magdalena Dembinska
Magdalena Dembinska*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Magdalena Dembinska, Centre for Developing-Area Studies (CDAS), McGill University, 3715 Peel Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1X1, Canada, magdalena.dembinska@mail.mcgill.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The article explores the relationship between institutional constraints and nation-building. Non-recognized Rusyns in Ukraine and Silesians in Poland respond instrumentally to state definitions of “minority.” Moreover, both groups adjust their strategies to European structures and discourses which provide new ways to frame their identity claims. Institutions determine the constraints and incentives of group action. Identity is not only constructed, but is reconstructed in a rational way. Contrary, however, to the rational choice instrumental perspective which would predict an assimilation process, state policies encourage the Rusyns and Silesians to re-imagine and reinforce their distinctiveness.

Résumé. L'article examine le lien qui existe entre les contraintes institutionnelles et l'édification de la nation. Non reconnus, les Ruthènes en Ukraine et les Silésiens en Pologne réagissent instrumentalement aux définitions du terme «minorité» établies par ces États. De plus, les deux groupes adaptent leurs stratégies aux structures et aux discours de l'Europe, qui leur permet de formuler leurs revendications identitaires d'une nouvelle manière. Les institutions établissent les contraintes et les incitatifs à l'action collective. L'identité n'est pas seulement construite, elle est reconstruite de façon rationnelle. Contrairement, toutefois, à la perspective instrumentale du choix rationnel qui aurait prédit un processus d'assimilation, les politiques étatiques incitent les Ruthènes et les Silésiens à ré-imaginer et à renforcer leur identité distincte.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 915 - 934
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arel, Dominique. 2001. “Recreating Majorities.” National Council for Eurasian and East European Research. Washington, DC. http://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/2001-815-01g-Arel.pdf (May 14, 2006).Google Scholar
Baluk, Walenty. 2002. Koncepcje polityki narodowościowej Ukrainy (Conceptions of the Ukrainian Nation-Building Politics). Poland: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
Bartkus, Viva Ona. 1999. The Dynamic of Secession. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batt, Judy. 2000. “Transcarpathia: The Centre of Europe.” Paper presented at the CEES annual conference. http://www.crees.bham.ac.uk/research/transcrees.pdf (December 13, 2007).Google Scholar
Belitser, Natalya. N.d. “Political and Ethno-Cultural Aspects of the Rusyns' Problem.” Research paper. European Academy Bozen/Bolzano (Italy). http://dev.eurac.edu:8085/mugs2/do/blob.pdf?type=pdf&serial=1036425198529 (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Benedek, Andras S. 2001. Gens Fidelissima: The Rusyns. Buffalo: Matthias Corvinus Publishing.Google Scholar
Bialasiewicz, Luiza. 2002. “Upper Silesia: Rebirth of a Regional Identity in Poland.” In Region, State and Identity in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. Batt, Judy and Wolczuk, Kataryna. London and Portland: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bieda, Marcin. 2006. “Naród czy polityczna gra?” (Nation or a Political Game?). Conference paper. http://www.socjologia.ath.bielsko.pl/prace/mbieda_slask.pdf (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Cybula, Adrian and Majcherkiewicz, Tatiana. 2005. “Wielokulturowość regionu Środkowoeuropejskiego a narody i państwa narodowe” (Central European Multicultural Regions, Nations and Nation-States). Sprawy narowodościowe 26: 135–56.Google Scholar
Czesak, Artur. 2004. “Ślązacy w poszukiwaniu języka” (Silesians in Search of a Language). Przegląsd polonijny 30(3): 105–12.Google Scholar
Deets, Stephen. 2002. “Reconsidering East European Minority Policy.” East European Politics and Society 16(1): 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deets, Stephen. 2004. “The Hungarian Status Law and the Specter of Neomedievalism in Europe.” Paper presented at APSA, Chicago. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72487_index.html (December 14, 2005).Google Scholar
Dulichenko, Aleksandr D. and Magocsi, Paul Robert, “Language Question.”http://www.rusyn.org/lanlanguage.html (November 26, 2007)Google Scholar
Gębusia, Jacek. 2006. “Walka o autonomię” (The Battle for Autonomy). In Współczesna wojna (Modern War), ed. Dziewulska, Agata. Varsovie: Centrum Europejskie UW.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Marian G. 1994. “Śląska krzywda” (The Silesian Prejudice). Etnografia polska 38(1–2): 5–21.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Marian G. 2002. “Powoływanie narodu śląskiego” (Claims for Silesian Nation). Etnografia polska 46(1–2): 29–49.Google Scholar
Gurpreet, Mahajan. 2002. The Multicultural Path. New Delhi and London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2004. “Explaining Ethnicity.” Comparative Political Studies 37(4): 458–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Lynn. 2004. “What's It Worth to You? The Questionable Value of Instrumentalist Approaches to Ethnic Identification.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 45(3–4): 253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ieda, Osamu. 2004. “Post-communist Nation Building and the Status Law Syndrome in Hungary.” In The Hungarian Status Law, ed. Kántor, Zoltán, Majtényi, Balázs, Ieda, Osamu, Vizi, Balázs and Halász, Iván. http//src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/coe21/publish/no4_ses/contents.html (November 28, 2007).Google Scholar
Jesse, Neal G. and Williams, Kristen P.. 2005. Identity and Institutions. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kamusella, Tomasz. 1994. “Musisz być Niemcem, albo Polakiem” (You Have to Be Either German or Polish). Sprawy narodowościowe 14–15: 113–23.Google Scholar
Kamusella, Tomasz. 1999. “The Upper Silesians' Stereotypical Perception of the Poles and the Germans.” East European Quarterly 33(3): 395–410.Google Scholar
Kamusella, Tomasz. 2004. “Standardyzacja języka górnośląskiego i jej implikacje społeczno-polityczne” (Silesian Language Standardization and Its Socio-Political Implications). Sprawy narodowościowe 24–25: 113–31.Google Scholar
Kamusella, Tomasz. 2005. “O języku śląskim” (On the Silesian). http://raslaska.aremedia.net/pol/publicystyka/06/06jslaski.html (February 5, 2008).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J. 2001. Modern Hatreds. The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Michael. 2003. “European Integration and Nationalities Question.” http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/euc/PDFs/2005%20Papers/Keating%20IPSA%20paper.pdf (November 16, 2007).Google Scholar
Kochanowicz, Jerzy. 2001. “Gathering Poles into Poland.” In Redrawing Nations, ed. Ther, Phillipp. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kranz, Jerzy. 1998. “A National Minority of Silesians?” The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs 7(4): 61–76.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 2005. “The Rusyn Question in Ukraine.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 32: 1–15.Google Scholar
Laitin, David. 1995. “Marginality.” Rationality and Society 7(1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David. 1998. Identity in Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Hugo. 2001. “Rusyns and Ukrainians Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.” Nationalities Papers 29(4): 689–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linek, Bernard. 2001. “‘De-Germanization’ and ‘Re-Polonization’ in Upper Silesia.” In Redrawing Nations, ed. Ther, Phillipp and Siljak, Ana. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Łodziński, Sławomir. 2005. Wyrównanie czy uprzywilejowanie? (Justice or Priviledges?). Kancelaria Sejmu (Parliament, Poland). Report 232.Google Scholar
Madajczyk, Piotr. 2000. “Les minoritiés nationales dans le processus de réconciliation germano-polonaise.” Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest 31(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. 1992. “Carpatho-Rusyns: Their Current Status and Future Perspectives.” The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs 1(1–2): 95–111.Google Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. 1996. “Another Slavic Language in Making.” Slavonic and East European Review 74(4): 683–86.Google Scholar
Máiz, Ramón and Requejo, Ferran, eds. 2005. Democracy, Nationalism and Multiculturalism. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Makara, M. and Sharga, M.. 2005. “Arguments for Recognizing the Nationality of the Indigenous Subcarpathian Rusyn People in Ukraine.” http://www.rusynmedia.org/Documents/ZakObl/Arguments.pdf (November 28, 2007).Google Scholar
May, Stephen, Modood, Tariq and Squires, Judith, ed. 2004. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michna, Ewa. 1995. “Czy nowy nacjonalizm? Ruch Rusiński na Słowacji, Ukrainie i w Polsce” (New Nationalism? Rusyn Movement in Slovakia, Ukraine and Poland). Przegląd polonijny 21(1): 71–81.Google Scholar
Michna, Ewa. 1998. “Institutionalization of Carpatho-Rusyn Community Life and Its Subjection to Political Conditions.” http://lgi.osi.hu/ethnic/csdb/doc/Amichna.doc (November 29, 2007).Google Scholar
Michna, Ewa. 2004. “Od ‘euroentuzjazmu’ do ‘europragmatyzmu’” (From Euroenthusiam to Europragmatism). In Pogranicza i multikulturalizm w warunkach Unii Europejskiej (Border Regions and Multiculturalism in the EU Context), ed. Krzysztofek, Kazimierz and Sadowski, Andrzej. Białystok, Poland: Instytut Socjologii.Google Scholar
Niewiadomski, Andrzej. 1995. “Rusini walczą o niepodległość” (Rusyns' Battle for Independence). Rzeczpospolita. February 28.Google Scholar
Poland. State Security Department. 2000. Tajne dokumenty UOP. Raport dotyczący zagrożzeń dla bezpieczeństwa państwa (SSD Secret Documents. Report on State Security Threats). http://www.videofact.com/mark/uop/uop1.html (November 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Pozun, Brian J. 2000. “Multi-Ethnic Outpost.” Central Europe Review 2: 40.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh. Forthcoming. “Majority-Minority Relations in Ukraine.” In An Ever Diverse Union? ed. Waller, Marc. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pustułka, Agata, Roczniok, A., Adamus, R.. 2008. “Śląski wśród języków świata” (Silesian Among World Languages). Dziennik Zachodni, June 20, 22–23.Google Scholar
RAŚ (Ruch Autonomii Śląska). 2007. “O zasadności kodyfikacji słów kilka” (On the Need of Codification). http://www.raslaska.aremedia.net (March 15, 2007).Google Scholar
Regional Parliament of Subcarpathian Rusyns. 2004. Letter to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. http://www.rusynmedia.org/Documents/Misc/CouncilEur.pdf (January 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Ross, Marc Howard. 2007. Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusinko, Elaine. 1998. Review article: “Rusynsky/Russky pysni. Ed. Natalija Dudash, 1997” and “Muza spid Karpat. Ed. Anna Plishkova, 1996.” The Slavic and East European Journal 42(2): 348–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruszczewski, Jacek. 1995. “Etnicznosć a konflikty społeczne na Śląsku Opolskim” (Ethnicity and Social Conflicts in Opole Silesia). Przegląd polonijny 21(1): 101–13.Google Scholar
Rygjou, Adam. 2008. “Śląskość ciąsgle gości na marginesie kultury” (Slesian Still on the Marge of Cuture). Gazeta Wyborca–Katowice, January 12,2.Google Scholar
Safran, William. 2004. “Introduction: The Political Aspects of Language.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaap, Andrew. 2005. Political Reconciliation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schöpflin, George. 2000. Nations, Identity, Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seriot, Patrick. 2006. “Droit au nom et droit du nom: les Ruthènes sont-ils une minorité?” Slavica Occitania 22: 207–33.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1957. “Primordial, Personal, Sacred, and Civil Ties.” British Journal of Sociology 8: 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1999. Myths and Memories of the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solchanyk, Roman. 1994. “The Politics of State-Building: Centre-Periphery Relations in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 46(1): 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Committee of Ukraine dealing with Nationalities and Emigration. 1996. “Plan of measures in respect to resolution of problems of Ukrainian-Rusyns.” http://www.lemko.org/rusyn/kurasen.html (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Stivell, Alan. 2003. “Besoins et enjeux de la reconnaissance.” In Identité et démocratie, ed. Le Coadic, Ronan. Nantes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Subcarpathian Rusyns. 2004. Letter to Kuchma, President of Ukraine, http://www.rusynmedia.org/Documents/Misc/Kuchma.pdf (January 15, 2008).Google Scholar
Szmeja, Maria. 1998. “Grupa pogranicza i jej identyfikacja narodowa” (Border Group and Its National Identification). Przegląd polonijny 24(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
Szmeja, Maria. 2002. “Identyfikacja narodowa Ślązaków na Opolszczyźnie” (Silesian National Identification in Opole Region). Przegląd polonijny 28(2): 43–53.Google Scholar
Thaler, Peter. 2001. “Fluid Identities in Central European Borderlands.” European History Quarterly 31(4): 519–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Transcarpatian Rusyns Want Official Recognition.” 2006. RFE/RL. September 26. http://www.rferl.org/reports/pbureport/2006/09/33-260906.asp (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 2001. “Primordialism Lives!” APSA-CP 12(1): 20–22.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2003. “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and Rationality.” American Political Science Association 1(1): 85–99. http://www.apsanet.org.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2004. Politics and Passion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. 2004. “Rival Versions of the East Slavic Idea.” In The Lagacy of the Soviet Union, ed. Slater, Wendy and Wilson, Andrew. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. “Self-Determination and Global Democracy.” In Multiculturalism in Contemporary Societies, ed. Breinig, Helmbrecht, Gebhardt, Jurgen and Losch, Klaus, Erlangen, Germany: Universitatsbund Erlangen.Google Scholar
ZLNŚ (Association of National Silesians). 2005. Appellation letter to the Katowice Court. http://zlns.republika.pl (March 17, 2008)Google Scholar