Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Intersectionality and Gendered Political Behaviour in a Multicultural Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2017

Allison Harell
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Research on gendered political behaviour has been heavily influenced by feminist scholarship in understanding gender inequalities. Yet it has been more difficult to integrate the insights of more recent waves of feminist critics, notably among intersectional scholars. The focus has been on differences between women and men, rather than among differently situated women. This article addresses the difficulties of integrating intersections into large-n style studies of political behaviour using “situated comparisons” (Dhamoon, 2010). It then provides an analysis of gender gaps in turnout and civic engagement across ethnoracial groups in Canada using the Ethnic Diversity Survey (2002).It concludes by arguing that the study of gender and political behaviour must find a place for intersectional feminist approaches.

Résumé

La recherche sur le comportement politique sexospécifique a été fortement influencée par les études féministes sur la compréhension des inégalités entre les sexes. Or, il a été plus difficile d'intégrer les perspectives des vagues les plus récentes des critiques féministes, notamment parmi les chercheurs intersectionnels. L'accent a été focalisé sur les différences entre hommes et femmes, plutôt qu'entre des femmes qui occupent des places différentes. Cet article considère les difficultés d'intégrer des intersections dans de vastes études du comportement politique en utilisant des « comparaisons situées » (Dhamoon 2010). Il présente ensuite une analyse des écarts entre les sexes au regard de la participation et de l'engagement civique dans les groupes ethnoraciaux au Canada à l'aide de l'Enquête sur la diversité ethnique (2002). Il fait valoir en conclusion que l’étude du comportement sexospécifique et politique doit trouver une place pour les approches féministes intersectionnelles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bilodeau, Antoine. 2008. “Immigrants' Voice through Protest Politics in Canada and Australia: Assessing the Impact of Pre-Migration Political Repression.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (6): 9751002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence and Gilliam, Franklin. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Lehman Schlozman, Kay and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1988. “Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980 and 1982.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, ed. Mueller, C.. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chui, Tina W.L., Curtis, James E. and Lambert, Ronald D.. 1991Immigrant Background and Political Participation: Examining Generational Patterns.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 375–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Elizabeth and Stewart, Abigail. 1996. “Meanings of Political Participation among Black and White Women: Political Identity and Social Responsibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1): 130–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Couton, Philippe and Gaudet, Stéphanie. 2008. “Rethinking social participation: The case of immigrants in Canada.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 9 (1): 2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.University of Chicago Legal Forum 1969 (1):139–68.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1994. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Colour.” In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, M.A. and Mykitiul, R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita K. 2009. Identity/Difference Politics: How Difference is Produces, and Why It Matters. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita K. 2010. “Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality.” Political Research Quarterly. 64 (1): 230–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Karen K. and Dion, Kenneth L.. 2004. “Gender, Immigrant Generation, and Ethnocultural Identity.Sex Roles 50 (5–6): 347–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Isabel and Tigar McLaren, Arlene. 2004. “Telling It Like It Is? Constructing Accounts of Settlement with Immigrant and Refugee Women in Canada.” Gender, Place & Culture 11 (4): 513–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Lynda and O'Neill, Brenda. 2002. “The Gender Gap and the Changing Woman Voter in Canada.” International Political Science Review 23 (4): 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, Joanna. 1998. “The Gender Gap in Canada: Now You See It, Now You Don't. Canadian Review of Sociology 35 (2): 191219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine, and Tate, Katherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19 (1): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2007. “Beyond the Gender Gap.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 815–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth and Harell, Allison. 2013. “L'appui des Québécoises aux partis politiques provinciaux.” Les Québécois aux urnes : les partis, les médias & les citoyens en campagne, ed. Bastien, Frédérick, Bélanger, Éric and Gélineau, François. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Guterbock, Thomas and London, Bruce. 1983. “Race, Political Orientation, and Participation: An Empirical Test of Four Competing Theories.” American Sociological Review 48 (4): 439–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.” Politics and Gender 3 (2): 248–54.Google Scholar
Hardy-Fanta, Carol. 1993. Latina Politics, Latino Politics: Gender, Culture and Political Participation in Boston. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Harell, Allison. 2009. “Equal Participation but Separate Paths: Women's Social Capital and Turnout.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 30 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harell, Allison, and Panagos, Dimitrios. 2013. “Locating the Aboriginal Gender Gap: The Political Attitudes and Participation of Aboriginal Women in Canada.” Politics & Gender 9: 414–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell, 1981. Ain't I a Woman? Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzigsohn, José and Giorguli-Saucedo, Silvia. 2006. “Incorporation, Transnationalism, and Gender: Immigrant Incorporation and Transnational Participation as Gendered Processes.International Migration Review 39 (4):895920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Correa, Michael. 1998. “Different Paths: Gender, Immigration and Political Participation.” International Migration Review 32 (2): 326–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowndes, Vivien. 2004. “Getting On or Getting By? Women, Social Capital and Political Participation.British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6:4766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2004. Feminism Without Borders: Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Montoya, Lisa, Hardy-Fanta, Carol and Garcia, Sonia. 2000. “Latina Politics: Gender, Participation, and Leadership.” PS: Political Science and Politics 33 (3): 555–61.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2005. Gender and Social Capital. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prindeville, Diane-Michele and Bretting, John. 1998. “Indigenous Women Activists and Political Participation: The Case of Environmental Justice.” Women and Politics 19 (1): 3958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rublee, Cindy B. and Shaw, Susan M.. 1991. “Constraints on the leisure and community participation of immigrant women: Implications for social integration.” Loisir et société/Society and Leisure 14 (1): 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shingles, Richard. 1981. “Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link.American Political Science Review 75 (1):7691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart Soroka, Richard Johnston and Banting, Keith. 2007. “Ties that Bind: Social Cohesion and Diversity in Canada” In The Art of the State III: Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, ed. Banting, Keith, Courchene, Thomas J. and Leslie Seidle, F.. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1989. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2010. “What do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 1991. “Black Political Participation in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Elections.American Political Science Review 85 (4):1159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 1997. Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Halifax: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1977. “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 711–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 193210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 145
Total number of PDF views: 791 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th June 2017 - 18th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-wd6lz Total loading time: 0.294 Render date: 2021-01-18T15:02:12.544Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Mon Jan 18 2021 14:54:19 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Intersectionality and Gendered Political Behaviour in a Multicultural Canada
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Intersectionality and Gendered Political Behaviour in a Multicultural Canada
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Intersectionality and Gendered Political Behaviour in a Multicultural Canada
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *