Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T05:15:32.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trust and Reciprocity: Foundational Principles for Human Subjects Imaging Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

J. Illes  and
V. Chin
J. Illes
Affiliation:
Palo Alto, California, USA
V. Chin
Affiliation:
Palo Alto, California, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 3 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2007

References

1. Seelig, BJ, Dobelle, WH. Altruism and the volunteer: psychological benefits from participating as a research subject. ASAIO J. 2001;47:3–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Moseley, ME, Glover, GH. Functional MR imaging. capabilities and limitations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1995;5:161–91.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Bangert, BA. Magnetic resonance techniques in the evaluation of the fetal and neonatal brain. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2001;8:74–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Glenn, OA, Barkovich, J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(pt 2):1807–14.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Illes, J, Kirschen, MP, Edwards, E, et al. Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science. 2006;311:783–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Edwards, A, Elwyn, G, Gwyn, R. General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study. BMJ. 1999;319:749–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar