Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:00:42.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tizanidine Versus Baclofen in the Treatment of Spasticity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

B. Bass ,
B. Weinshenker ,
G.P.A. Rice ,
J.H. Noseworthy ,
M.G.P. Cameron ,
W. Hader ,
S. Bouchard  and
G.C. Ebers
B. Bass*
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
B. Weinshenker
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
G.P.A. Rice
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
J.H. Noseworthy
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
M.G.P. Cameron
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
W. Hader
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
S. Bouchard
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
G.C. Ebers
Affiliation:
University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
*
MS Clinic, 70P33, University Hospital, P.O. Box 5339, Postal Station A, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tizanidine (Sirdalud) was compared to baclofen (Lioresal) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Each medication was introduced over a three week titration period and then maintained at the highest tolerated dose for five weeks. The two treatment phases were separated by a one week drug withdrawal and a two week washout period. Sixty-six patients entered the trial and forty-eight completed both treatment phases. At the end of the trial, neurologists and physiotherapists thought that baclofen was superior on the basis of perceived efficacy and tolerance (p≤0.05). Although the efficacy of tizanidine or baclofen was judged as good to excellent by 24 and 39% of patients respectively, this difference was not statistically significant. Muscle weakness was the most common adverse effect. This was significantly more troublesome in patients treated with baclofen. Somnolence and xerostomia were more common in patients treated with tizanidine. Both baclofen and tizanidine appear to be useful adjuncts in the treatment of spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Preference of either drug is tempered principally by side-effects.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 15 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Young, RR and Delwaide, PJ. Drug therapy - spasticity. Engl J Med 1981; 304: 28–33.28-33; 96–99.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Sachais, BA, Logue, JN and Carey, MS. Baclofen, a new antispastic drug. Arch Neurol 1977; 34: 422–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Coward, DM. Selective muscle relaxant properties of tizanidine and an examination of its mode of action. Triangle 1981; 20: 151–158.Google Scholar
4.Ringwald, E, Campian, SJ, Gerstenbrand, F, et al. Klinische erfahrungen mit einem neuartigen myotonolytikum (DS 103-282 Sandoz). Nervenarzt 1977; 48: 355–358.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Rinne, UK. Tizanidine treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis and chronic myelopathy. Curr Ther Res 1980; 28: 827–836.Google Scholar
6.Poser, CM, Paty, DW, Scheinberg, L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis; guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Kurtzke, JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Siegel, S. Non parametric statistics for behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
9.Pederson, E.A. rating system for neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1965; 41; (suppl 13): 557–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hassan, N, and Mclellan, DL. Double blind comparison of single doses of DS-103-282, baclofen and placebo for suppression of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43: 1132–1136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Smolenski, C, Muff, S, Smolenski-Kautz, S. A double blind comparative trial of a new muscle relaxant, tizanidine and baclofen in the treatment of chronic spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 1981; 7: 374–383.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Delwaide, PJ. Electrophysiological analysis of the mode of action of muscle relaxants in spasticity. Ann Neurol 1985; 17: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed