Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Stroke Rehabilitation in Ontario: An Opportunity for Health Care Transformation

  • Matthew J Meyer (a1), John P Meyer (a2), Norine Foley (a1), Katherine Salter (a1) (a3), J Andrew McClure (a1) (a4) and Robert Teasell (a1) (a5)...

Abstract

In this article, Ontario's stroke rehabilitation system is used to exemplify the challenges faced by rehabilitation and healthcare systems across Canada who are attempting to provide quality care to patients in the face of increasing demands. Currently, Ontario's rehabilitation system struggles in its efforts to provide accessible and comprehensive care to patients recovering from stroke. We begin our exploration by identifying both the primary stakeholders and the underlying factors that have contributed to the current challenges. The framework put forward in the Canadian Medical Association's recommendations for transformation is then used to suggest a vision for a more patient-focused system incorporating three key principles: a broader perspective, a patient-first approach, and greater unity. The use of health information technology, proper incentives, and greater accountability are discussed as mechanisms to improve the quality and efficiency of care.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Stroke Rehabilitation in Ontario: An Opportunity for Health Care Transformation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Stroke Rehabilitation in Ontario: An Opportunity for Health Care Transformation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Stroke Rehabilitation in Ontario: An Opportunity for Health Care Transformation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

The Lawson Health Research Institute, ARGC Parkwood Hospital, 801 Commissioners Rd. E Ste B-3019a, London, Ontario, N6C 5J1, Canada.

References

Hide All
1.Canadian Medical Association. Health care transformation in Canada: Change that works. Care that lasts [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; c1995-2011 [cited 2011 May 22]. Available from: http://www.cma.ca/multimedia/CMA/Content_Images/Inside_cma/Advocacy/HCT/HCT-2010report_en.pdf
2.Canadian Institute for Health Information. Alternate level of care in Canada [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; c1996-2011 [cited 2011 May 25]. Available from: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/ALC_AIB_FINAL.pdf
3.Hall, R, O’Callaghan, C, Bayley, M, et al.Ontario stroke evaluation report 2010: technical report [Internet]. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; c2011 [cited 2011 May 22]. Available from: http://www.ices.on.ca/file/OSS_TechReport_Final_interactive_April%2021_update1.pdf
4.Chan, B, Hayes, B.Cost of stroke in Ontario, 1994/95. CMAJ. 1998;159(6):s28.
5.Lewis, M, Trypuc, J, Lindsay, P, O’Callaghan, C, Dishaw, A.Has Ontario’s stroke system really made a difference? Healthc Q. 2006;9(4):509.
6.Canada Health Act [Internet]. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada [updated 2011 May 18; cited 2011 May 22]. Available from: http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/pdf/Statute/C/C-6.pdf
7.Willems, D, Bryant, D, O’Callaghan, C.Are stroke survivors getting the rehabilitation services they need? Stroke. 2011;42(3):e337.
8.Lindsay, P, Bayley, M, McDonald, A, Graham, ID, Warner, G, Phillips, S.Toward a more effective approach to stroke: Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care. CMAJ. 2008;178(11):141825.
9.Salter, K, Jutai, J, Hartley, M, et al.Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(2):1137.
10.Musicco, M, Emberti, L, Nappi, G, Caltagirone, C.Early and longterm outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation, and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):5518.
11.Maulden, SA, Gassaway, J, Horn, SD, Smout, RJ, DeJong, G.Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12 Supp 2):S3440.
12.De Wit, L, Putman, K, Schuback, B, et al.Motor and functional recovery after stroke: a comparison of 4 European rehabilitation centers. Stroke. 2007;38(7):21017.
13.Kwakkel, G, van Peppen, R, Wagenaar, RC, et al.Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):252939.
14.Kwakkel, G, Wagenaar, RC, Koelman, TW, Lankhorst, GJ, Koetsier, JC.Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28(8):15506.
15.Sonoda, S, Saitoh, E, Nagai, S, Kawakita, M, Kanada, Y.Full-time integrated treatment program, a new system for stroke rehabilitation in Japan: comparison with conventional rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(2):8893.
16.Aprile, I, Stasio, ED, Romitelli, F, et al.Effects of rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with chronic stroke. Brain Inj. 2008;22(6):4516.
17.Olsson, BG, Sunnerhagen, KS.Functional and cognitive capacity and health-related quality of life 2 years after day hospital rehabilitation for stroke: a prospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;16(5):20815.
18.Studenski, S, Duncan, PW, Perera, S, Reker, D, Lai, SM, Richards, L.Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke. 2005;36(8):176470.
19.Mayo, NE, Wood-Dauphinee, S, Cote, R, et al.There’s no place like home : an evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(5):101623.
20.Teng, J, Mayo, NE, Latimer, E, et al.Costs and caregiver consequences of early supported discharge for stroke patients. Stroke. 2003;34(2):52836.
21.Smit, P.Pathways for people with stroke to live fully in the community [Internet]. Toronto; Queen’s printer for Ontario; c2006 [updated 2011 May 25; cited 2011 May 25] Available from: http://www.eriestclairlhin.on.ca/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=3916
22.Walker, JD, Morris, K, Frood, J.Alternative level of care in Canada: a summary. Healthc Q. 2009;12(2):213.
23.Kerr, S.On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive. 1995;9(1):714.
24.Hultman, K.Making change irresistible. Palo Alto, CA: Davies Black Publishing; 1998.
25.Ilett, PA, Brock, KA, Graven, CJ, Cotton, SM.Selecting patients for rehabilitation after acute stroke: are there variations in practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):78893.
26.Conroy, BE, DeJong, G, Horn, SD.Hospital-based stroke rehabilitation in the United States. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(1):3443.

Stroke Rehabilitation in Ontario: An Opportunity for Health Care Transformation

  • Matthew J Meyer (a1), John P Meyer (a2), Norine Foley (a1), Katherine Salter (a1) (a3), J Andrew McClure (a1) (a4) and Robert Teasell (a1) (a5)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed