Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:46:41.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Quality of Life in Epilepsy Surgery Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Samuel Wiebe  and
Paul A. Derry
Samuel Wiebe
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western, Ontario, London, ON Canada
Paul A. Derry
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western, Ontario, London, ON Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Treatment of chronic conditions often entails trade-offs between benefits and risks or side effects. This is of particular importance in epilepsy. Consequently, assessment of effectiveness must incorporate this trade-off as perceived by the recipient of the intervention, ie., the patient. Measurement of health related quality of life (HRQOL) aims at capturing such patient-centred effects of therapy. Conceptual aspects of HRQOL are described and issues relevant to outcomes of epilepsy surgery are addressed. Finally, practical aspects of measurement in the context of epilepsy surgery are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue S1: Canadian Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery Workshop , May 2000 , pp. S111 - S115
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2000

References

1. Vickrey, BG, Hays, RD, Graber, J, et al. A health-related quality oflife instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. Med Care 1992; 30: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Gill, TM, Feinstein, AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA 1994; 272: 619–626.Google Scholar
3. Cramer, JA, Smith, DB, Mattson, RH, et al. A method ofquantification for the evaluation of antiepileptic drug therapy. Neurology 1983; 33(Suppl 1): 26–37.Google Scholar
4. Baker, GA, Smith, DF, Dewey, M, Jacoby, A, Chadwick, DW. Theinitial development of a health-related quality of life model as an outcome measure in epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 1993; 16: 65–81.Google Scholar
5. O'Donoghue, MF, Duncan, JS, Sander, JW. The National HospitalSeizure Severity Scale: a further development of the Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lennox, W, Lennox, M. Epilepsy and Related Disorders. Vols. 1 and 2., Boston: Little, Brown 1960.Google Scholar
7. Taylor, DC. The components of sickness: disease, illness, andpredicaments. Lancet 1979; 1: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dodrill, C, Batzel, LW, Queisser, HR, Temkin, NR. An objectivemethod for the assessment of psychological and social problems among epileptics. Epilepsia 1980; 21: 123–135.Google Scholar
9. Cramer, JA. Quality of life for people with epilepsy. Neurol Clin 1994; 12(S1): 1–13.Google Scholar
10. Trostle, JA, Hauser, WA, Sharbrough, FW. Psychologic and socialadjustment to epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota. Neurology 1989; 39: 633–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wiebe, S, Rose, K, Derry, PA, et al. Outcome assessment in epilepsy:comparative responsiveness of quality of life and psychosocialinstruments. Epilepsia 1997; 38: 430–438.Google Scholar
12. Chaplin, JE, Yepez, R, Shorvonq, S, Floyd, M. A quantitative approachto measuring the social effects of epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology 1990; 9: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hermann, BP. Quality of life in epilepsy. J Epilepsy 1992; 5: 153–165.Google Scholar
14. Chaplin, JE, Yepez, R, Shorvon, SD, Floyd, M. National generalpractice study of epilepsy: the social and psychological effects of a recent diagnosis of epilepsy. Br Med J 1992; 304: 1416–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kendrick, AM, Trimble, MR. Repertory grid in the assessment of quality of life in patients with epilepsy: the quality of life assessment schedule. In: Trimble, MR, Dodson, WE, eds. Epilepsy and Quality of Life. New York: Raven Press Ltd., 1994: 151–163.Google Scholar
16. Chadwick, D. Measuring antiepileptic therapies: the patient vs thephysician viewpoint. Neurology 1994; 44: S24-S28.Google Scholar
17. Bergner, M, Bobbitt, RA, Carter, W, Gilson, BS. The sickness impactprofile: development and final revision of a health statusmeasure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Hunt, SM, McEwen, J, McKenna, SP. Measuring health status: a newtool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1985; 35: 185–188.Google Scholar
19. Ware, JE Jr., Sherbourne, CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form HealthSurvey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–482.Google Scholar
20. Devinsky, O, Cramer, JA. Assessing quality of life in epilepsy:development of a new inventory. Epilepsia 1993; 34(Suppl 4):S1-S44Google Scholar
21. Guyatt, GH, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten, SJO, Feeny, DH, Patrick, D. Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review. Can Med Assoc J 1989; 140: 1441–1448.Google ScholarPubMed
22. Guyatt, G, Patrick, D, Feeney, D. Postscript. Control Clin Trials 1991;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Weinstein, MC, Siegel, JE, Gold, MR, Kamlet, MS, Russell, LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1253–1258.Google Scholar
24. Gafni, A. The Standard Gamble method: what is being measured andhow it is interpreted. Health Serv Res 1994; 29: 207–224.Google Scholar
25. Torrance, GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related qualityof life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Torrance, GW, Feeny, DH, Furlong, WJ, et al. Multi-attribute utilityfunction for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 1996; 34: 702–722.Google Scholar
27. Kaplan, RM, Bush, JW. Health-related quality of life measurementfor evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol 1982; 1: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Brazier, J, Jones, N, Kind, P. Testing the validity of the Euroqol andcomparing it with the SF- 36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Torrance, GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economicappraisal: a review. J Health Economics 1986; 5: 1–30.Google Scholar
30. Wagner, AK, Keller, SD, Kosinski, M, et al. Advances in methods forassessing the impact of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy on patients’ health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Vickrey, BG, Hays, RD, Engel, J Jr., et al. Outcome assessment forepilepsy surgery: the impact of measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 158–166.Google Scholar
32. Cramer, JA, Perrine, K, Devinsky, O, et al. Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-item quality of life in epilepsyinventory. Epilepsia 1998; 39: 81–88.Google Scholar
33. Cramer, JA, Perrine, K, Devinsky, O, Meador, K. Abrief questionnaireto screen for quality of life in epilepsy: the QOLIE-10. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 577–582.Google Scholar
34. Kirshner, B, Guyatt, GH. A methodologic framework for assessinghealth indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 27–36.Google Scholar
35. Jacoby, A. Epilepsy and the quality of everyday life. Findings froma study of people with well-controlled epilepsy. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Baker, GA, Jacoby, A, Smith, D, et al. Quality of life in epilepsy: theLiverpool initiative. In: Trimble, MR, Dodson, WE, eds. Epilepsy and Quality of Life. New York: Raven Press Ltd., 1994: 135–150.Google Scholar
37. Wiebe, S, Derry, PA, Rose, K, McLachlan, RS. In search of aminimum clinically important change in epilepsy-specific qualityof life instruments. Epilepsia 1997; 38: S83-S84.Google Scholar
38. McDowell, I, Newell, C. Measuring Health: AGuide to Rating Scalesand Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press 1987;Google Scholar
39. Nunnally, JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill 1978.Google Scholar
40. Guyatt, GH, Walter, S, Norman, G, Guyatt, G. Measuring change overtime: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171–178.Google Scholar
41. Jaeschke, R, Singer, J, Guyatt, GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407–415.Google Scholar
42. Guyatt, GH, Feeney, D, Patrick, D. Issues in quality of lifemeasurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12: 81S-CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Wiebe, S, Derry, P, Gilmore, B, Foster-Janzen, L. Does the time frameof quality of life (QOL) questionnaires affect the results? Epilepsia 1997; 38: S135.Google Scholar