Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:12:48.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-Observer Agreement in Assessing Comatose Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Shashi S. Seshia ,
Jerome Y. Yager ,
Bruce Johnston  and
Philip Haese
Shashi S. Seshia*
Affiliation:
Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, Winnipeg University of Manitoba and Children's Hospital, Winnipeg
Jerome Y. Yager
Affiliation:
Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, Winnipeg University of Manitoba and Children's Hospital, Winnipeg
Bruce Johnston
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Winnipeg
Philip Haese
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Winnipeg
*
Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, University of Manitoba and Children's Hospital, 840 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Canada R3A 1S1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Inter-observer agreement was evaluated for twelve items used in the neurological assessment of comatose children. Data were obtained prospectively on fifteen patients examined independently by two observers in a double-blind fashion. Observer variability was measured by using the Disagreement Rate and Kappa statistic. The Disagreement Rate ranged from 0.01 to 0.12 for all items. Values for Kappa statistic were generally in accordance with those for Disagreement Rate. The data suggest fair to almost perfect inter-observer agreement for the items used to assess comatose children in this study.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , November 1991 , pp. 472 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Plum, F, Posner, JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Contemporary Neurology Series, Philadelphia: EA. Davis Co. 1966.Google Scholar
2.Plum, F, Posner, JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma; Edition 3: Contemporary Neurology Series, Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co. 1980.Google Scholar
3.Bates, D, Caronna, JJ, Cartlidge, NEF, et al. A prospective study of non-traumatic coma: Methods and results in 310 patients. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Levy, DE, Bates, D, Caronna, JJ, et al. Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. AnnIntern Med 1981; 94: 293–301.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Seshia, SS, Seshia, MMK, Sachdeva, RK. Coma in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 1977; 19: 614–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Seshia, SS, Johnston, B, Kasian, G. Non-traumatic coma in childhood: clinical variables in prediction of outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol 1983; 25: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Van Den Berge, JH, Schouten, HJA, Boomstra, S, et al. Interobserver agreement in assessment of ocular signs in coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979; 42: 1163–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Teasdale, G. Knill-Jones, R, Van der Sande, J. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978; 41: 603–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Cohen, J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37–46.Google Scholar
10.Cohen, J. Weighted Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Fleiss, JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981, 212–236.Google Scholar
12.Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977; 33: 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Feinstein, AR. Clinimetrics. Yale University Press: New Haven and London, 1987: 188,215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Reilly, PL, Simpson, DA, Sprod, R, et al. Assessing the conscious level in infants and young children: a pediatric version of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Child’s Nerv Syst 1988; 4: 30–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Yager, JY, Johnston, B, Seshia, SS. Coma scales in pediatric practice. Am JDisChild 1990; 144: 1088–1091.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Koran, LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 642–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Koran, LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 695–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Department of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Clinical disagreement: I. How often it occurs and why? Can Med Assoc J 1980; 123: 499–504.Google Scholar
19.Department of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Clinical disagreement: II. How to avoid it and how to learn from one’s mistakes? Can Med Assoc J 1980; 123: 613–617.Google Scholar