Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T00:45:33.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TRICHOGRAMMA SPP. (HYMENOPTERA: TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE) AS EGG PARASITOIDS OF SEPEDON FUSCIPENNIS (DIPTERA: SCIOMYZIDAE) AND OTHER AQUATIC DIPTERA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Steven A. Juliano
Steven A. Juliano
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At least two species of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) parasitize the eggs of Sepedon fuscipennis Loew (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) in freshwater habitats of central New York. Trichogramma julianoi Platner and Oatman parasitizes S. fuscipennis and Elgiva sundewalli Fries (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Trichogramma sp. near californicum Nagaraja and Nagarkatti parasitizes S. fuscipennis, E. sundewalli, Tetanocera spp. (Diptera: Sciomyzidae), and pyralid moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). T. julianoi was most active in early and late summer. T. sp. near californicum was most active in mid- and late summer. Another undescribed species, similar to Trichogramma semblidis (Aurivillius), occurs in the same habitats but does not parasitize S. fuscipennis. Its primary hosts are Stratiomyidae (Diptera). Mortality of S. fuscipennis eggs due to Trichogramma varied significantly over the summer and reached 43.6% in late July and early August. A list of parasitoids reared from eggs of insects collected in fresh-water habitats is given.

Résumé

Au moins deux espèces de Trichogramma (Hymenoptera : Trichogrammatidae) parasitent les œufs de Sepedon fuscipennis Loew (Diptera : Sciomyzidae) dans des milieux d’eau douce au centre de New-York. Trichogramma julianoi Platner et Oatman parasite S. fuscipennis et Elgiva sundewalli Fries (Diptera : Sciomyzidae). Trichogramma sp. près de californicum Nagaraja et Nagarkatti parasite E. sundwalli, Tetanocera spp. (Diptera : Sciomyzidae), et des pyrales (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae). L’acivité de T. julianoi a été maximale au début et la fin de l’été. L’activité de T. sp. près de californicum a été maximale au milieu et à la fin de l’été. Une autre espèce, non-décrite et semblable à Trichogramma semblidis (Aurivillius), occupe les mêmes habitats mais ne parasite pas S. fuscipennis. Ses hôtes primaires sont des Stratiomyidae (Diptera). La mortalité des œufs de S. fuscipennis due à Trichogramma a varié considérablement au cours de l’été, atteignant un sommet de 43.6% à la fin de juillet et au début d’août. Une liste des parasitoides obtenus à partir d’œufs d’insectes recueillis dans des habitats d’eau douce est présentée.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 4 , April 1981 , pp. 271 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, S. L. 1978. Field and simulation studies of the population dynamics of Sepedon fuscipennis (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University. xiii + 201 pp.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. K. 1976 a. The ecology of Sepedon fuscipennis Loew (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) with special reference to the significance of temperature in its population ecology. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University. vii + 75 pp.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. K. 1976 b. Effect of temperature on development, survival, oviposition, and diapause in laboratory populations of Sepedon fuscipennis (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Environ. Ent. 5: 1089–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, D. P. 1979. The function of enlarged hind legs in oviposition and aggression by Chalcis canadensis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae). Great Lakes Ent. 12: 133–136.Google Scholar
Foote, B. A. 1961. Biology and immature stages of the snail-killing Diptera of the genus Tetanocera (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University. vi + 190 pp.Google Scholar
Klomp, H. and Teerink, B. J.. 1962. Host selection and number of eggs per oviposition in the egg-parasite Trichogramma embryophagum Htg. Nature, Lond. 195: 1020–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, L. and Berg, C. O.. 1964. Biology and immature stages of snail-killing flies: The genus Elgiva (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kot, J. 1964. Experiments in the biology and ecology of species of the genus Trichogramma Westw. and their use in plant protection. Ekol. pol. (A) 12: 234–303.Google Scholar
Marston, N. and Ertle, L. R.. 1973. Host influence on the bionomics of Trichogramma minutum. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66: 1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Nagaraja, H.. 1971. Redescription of some known species of Trichogramma showing the importance of the male genitalia as a diagnostic character. Bull. ent. Res. 16: 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Nagaraja, H.. 1977. Biosystematics of Trichogramma and Trichogrammatoidea species. A. Rev. Ent. 22: 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, S. E. and Berg, C. O.. 1966. Biology and immature stages of malacophagous Diptera of the genus Sepedon (Sciomyzidae). Bull. Va agric. Exp. Stn 566. 113 pp.Google Scholar
Platner, G. R. and Oatman, E. R.. 1978. Effects of mass releases of Trichogramma pretiosum against lepidopterous pests on processing tomatoes in southern California, with notes on host egg population trends. J. econ. Ent. 77: 896–900.Google Scholar
Platner, G. R. and Oatman, E. R.. 1981. Description of a new species of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae) from New York. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 83: 164–167.Google Scholar
Pollack, V., M., 1975. Aspectos biologicos de tres especies de Trichogramma en Paramonga. Revta peru. Ent. agric. 18: 59–64.Google Scholar
Ram, A. and Sharma, A. K.. 1977. Laboratory assessment at different combinations of temperature and humidity of the efficiency of a strain of Trichogramma fasciatum (Perkins) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) selected for high fecundity. J. ent. Res. 1: 47–54.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, R. L. and Vinson, S. B. (Eds.). 1977. Biological Control by Augmentation of Natural Enemies: Insect and Mite Control with Parasites and Predators. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. W. 1935. Experimental studies of insect parasitism III. Host selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 117: 413–435.Google Scholar
Salt, G. W. 1938. Experimental studies of insect parasitism VI. Host suitability. Bull. ent. Res. 29: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulten, G. G. M. and Feijen, H. R.. 1978. Two new species of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) from Malawi: Egg parasitoids of Diopsis macrophthalma Dalman (Diptera: Diopsidae). Ent. Ber. Deell. 38: 25–29.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. and Stern, V. M.. 1971. Host preference studies with the parasite Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 1381–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valley, K. and Berg, C. O.. 1977. Biology, immature stages, and new species of the snail-killing Diptera of the genus Dictya (Sciomyzidae). Search (Cornell University) 7 (2): 1–44.Google Scholar
Weseloh, R. M. 1972. Influence of gypsy moth egg mass dimensions and microhabitat distribution on parasitization by Ooencyrtus kuwanai. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasumatsu, K. 1967. Distribution and bionomics of natural enemies of rice stem borers (Research on natural enemies of rice stem borers). Mushi 39(Suppl.): 33–44.Google Scholar