Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T01:51:39.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclops and the Euripidean tetralogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Matthew Wright
Matthew Wright
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article develops a suggestion which I made tentatively elsewhere: that Euripides' Cyclops was first produced in 412 BC, as part of a tetralogy which also included Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia among the Taurians. Given the paucity of the available evidence, it may be thought that there is little to be gained from further discussion of Euripidean production dates, or from yet more unprovable guesswork. Nevertheless, I think that it is worth raising the question of dating again, in order to explore a couple of related, and somewhat more interesting, subjects. First of all, there is the matter of the relationship between satyr-plays and the tragic trilogies with which they were produced. Secondly, this discussion may cast some new light on another old problem: the nature of Helen and other Euripidean plays whose generic status as ‘tragedies’ has often been doubted.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 52 , 2006 , pp. 23 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arrowsmith, W (1974) Euripides, Alcestis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brommer, F (1959) Das Satyrspiele, Berlin.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1987) ‘The dramatic synopses attributed to Aristophanes of Byzantium’, CQ 37, 427–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1971) Catastrophe survived: Euripides' plays of mixed reversal, Oxford.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. (1973) ‘A pro-satyric Helen? Addendum’, RSC 21, 412.Google Scholar
Collard, C., Cropp, M.J., and Gibert, J (eds.) (2004) Euripides: Selected fragmentary plays, vol. 2, Oxford.Google Scholar
Conacher, D. J. (ed.) (1988) Euripides, Alcestis, Warminster.Google Scholar
Cropp, M. J. (2005) ‘Lost tragedies: a survey’, in Gregory, J. (ed.) Companion to Greek tragedy, Oxford, 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropp, M. J. and Fick, G (1985) Resolutions and chronology in Euripides, BICS Suppl. 43, London.Google Scholar
Dale, A. M. (ed.) (1954) Euripides, Alcestis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dale, A. M. (1956) ‘Seen and unseen on the Greek stage’, WS 69, 99–106.Google Scholar
Davies, M (1988) ‘Stesichorus' Geryoneis and its folk-tale origins’, CQ 38, 277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delebecque, E (1951) Euripides et la guerre du Péloponnèse, Paris.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. (1954) The Greek particles (revised by K. J. Dover), Oxford.Google Scholar
Dunn, F. M. (1996) Tragedy's end: closure and innovation in Euripidean drama, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (1994) ‘Euripides outside Athens: a speculative note’, ICS 19, 73–80.Google Scholar
Fischer, I. M. (1958) Typische Motive im Satyrspiel, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Garvie, A. (1969) Aeschylus' Suppliants, play and trilogy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibert, J (ed.) (2004) Euripides, Andromeda.Google Scholar
in Collard, C., Cropp, M. and Gibert, J. (eds.) Euripides, selected fragmentary Plays, vol. 2, Oxford, 133–68.Google Scholar
Grégoire, H. (1948) ‘La date du Cyclope d'Euripide’, AC 17, 269–86.Google Scholar
Grégoire, H. (ed.) (1968) Euripide, vol 4 (Budé), Paris.Google Scholar
Griffith, M (2002) ‘Slaves of Dionysos: satyrs, audience, and the ends of the Oresteia’, CW 21, 195–258.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. (1961) The tragedies of Euripides (2nd edn.), London.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1971) The sophists, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. (1997) ‘Introduction’, in Morwood, J. (tr.) Euripides, Medea and other plays, Oxford, ix–xliv.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. (1998) ‘Ithyphallic males behaving badly; or, satyr drama as gendered tragic ending’, in Wyke, M. (ed.) Parchments of gender: deciphering the body in antiquity, Oxford, 13–37.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. J. (1991) ‘Comic satire and freedom of speech in classical Athens’, JHS 111, 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaibel, G (1895) ‘Kratinos' Odysses und Euripides' Kyklops’, Hermes 30, 71–89.Google Scholar
Koniaris, G (1973) ‘Alexander, Palamedes, Troades, Sisyphus–a. connected trilogy?’, HSCP 77, 85–112.Google Scholar
Konstan, D (1990) ‘An anthropology of Euripides' Kyklops’, in Winkler and Zeitlin (1990), 201–27.Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1979) ‘Euripidean comedy’, in (id.) Word and action: essays on the ancient theater, Baltimore, 250–74.Google Scholar
Ley, G (1991) ‘Scenic notes on Euripides' Helen’, Eranos 89, 25–34.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (2000) ‘Alcestis and the problem of prosatyric drama’, CJ 95, 229–38.Google Scholar
Masqueray, P (1904) ‘Agamemnon, Ménélas, Ulysse dans Euripide’, REA 6, 181–95.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, K (1964) Elektra, Taurische Iphigenie und Helena: Untersuchungen zur Chronologic und zur dramatischen Form im Spätwerk des Euripides, Hypomnemata 4, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, G. S. (1994) ‘“Where is the glory of Troy?” Kleos in Euripides' Helen’, ClAnt 13, 234–55.Google Scholar
Murray, G. (1932) ‘The Trojan trilogy of Euripides’, Mélanges Glotz 2, 645–56.Google Scholar
Patin, H (1894) Études sur les tragiques grecs: Euripide, vol. 2, Paris.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1930) ‘Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making’, HSCP 41, 73–147.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. (ed.) (1997) Greek tragedy and the historian, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, M (1968) A history of classical scholarship, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. (1988) The dramatic festivals of Athens (3rd edn., rev. Gould, J. and Lewis, D. M.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Propp, V (1968) The morphology of the folktale (tr. Scott, L.), Texas.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. (2003) ‘Nothing to do with democracy: Athenian drama and the polls’. JHS 123, 104–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. C. (1988) ‘Sophoclean endings: another story’, Arethusa 21, 177–94.Google Scholar
Schlegel, A. W. (1846) Lectures on dramatic ait and literature (tr. Black, J.), London.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W and Stählin, O. (1940) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Munich.Google Scholar
Scodel, R (1980) The Trojan trilogy of Euripides, Hypomnemata 60, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. A. S. (1982) ‘The date of Euripides' Cyclops’, JHS 102, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. A. S. (ed.) (1984) Euripides, Cyclops, Oxford.Google Scholar
Segal, C (1971) ‘The two worlds of Euripides' Helen’, TAPA 102, 553–614Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B (1979) ‘Das Satyrspiel’, in Seeck, G. A. (ed.), Das griechische Drama, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B (1982) Palintonos Harmonia: Studien zu komischen Elementen in der griechischen Tragödie, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M (1993) ‘Aristophanic paratragedy’, in Sommerstein, A. H. et al. (eds.) Tragedy, comedy, and the polis, Bari, 477–504.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F (1934) ‘Onoma and pragma in Euripides' Helen’, CR 48, 119–21.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1996) Aeschylean drama, Bari.Google Scholar
Steiger, H (1908) ‘Wie enstand die Helena des Euripides?’, Philologus 67, 202–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, H (1912) ‘Euripides: seine Dichtung und seine Persönlichkeit’, in Das Erhe der Alten 5, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1971) ‘The relation between tragedies and fourth-place plays in three instances’, Arethusa 4, 55–72.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1972) ‘Satyric qualities in Euripides' Iphigenia in Tauris and Helen’, RSC 20, 321–30.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1973) ‘Satyric elements in the Alcestis’, RSC 21, 384–91.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1974) The date of Euripides' Kyklops, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1980) The Greek satyr play, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. P. (1986) ‘Fifth-century comedy and tragedy: a synkrisis’, JHS 106, 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ussher, R. G. (ed.) (1978) Euripides, Cyclops, Rome.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. (1967) The tragedies of Euripides, London.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1983) ‘Tragica VI’, BICS 30, 63–82.Google Scholar
Wiesmann, P (1939) Das Problem der tragischen Tetralogie, Zurich.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1867) Valediktionsarbeit, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1875) Analecta Euripidea. Berlin.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.) (1990) Nothing to do with Dionysos? Athenian drama in its social context, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1969) ‘Euripides, poietes sophos’, Arethusa 2, 127–42.Google Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2005) Euripides' escape-tragedies: a study of Helen, Andromeda and Iphigenia among the Taurians, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2006) ‘Orestes, a Euripidean sequel’, CQ 56, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, T (1925) Tragodumenon libri tres, vol. 2: de trimetri Euripidei evolutione, Cracow.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G (1955) The political plays of Euripides, Manchester.Google Scholar