Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.53 Render date: 2022-08-13T16:45:54.078Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

THE POET AND THE EVANGELIST IN NONNUS’ PARAPHRASE OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2020

Fotini Hadjittofi*
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Christian poetry, and biblical epic in particular, is intensely self-conscious. Both Greek and Latin Christian poets begin or end their compositions, paraphrases and centos with poetological reflections on the value and objectives of their works. The fifth-century Paraphrase of the Gospel according to John is an anomaly in this tradition. While Nonnus’ mythological epic, the Dionysiaca, is heavily self-conscious in that it includes a strong authorial voice as well as an extensive prooemium and an interlude, the Christian Paraphrase has no prooemium, epilogue or interlude, and its narrator never identifies himself. This article examines two passages in the Paraphrase where subtle, implicit poetological reflections may be detected, and then explores the reasons why Nonnus may have chosen to deny the Paraphrase a clear (meta)literary identity. It argues that Nonnus’ poem presents itself as the Gospel of John, and that its narrator ‘becomes’ John the Evangelist in a spiritual exercise which is indebted to Origen's views on that Gospel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Philological Society.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments on earlier versions of this article I wish to thank audiences at Lisbon (‘Modulations and transpositions: the contexts and boundaries of “minor” and “major” genres in Late Antique Christian poetry, i’ conference, June 2017; with special thanks to Gianfranco Agosti and Anna Lefteratou) and Salamanca (5th ISLALS conference, ‘Literature squared: metaliterary reflections in Late Antiquity’, October 2017). The two anonymous reviewers for CCJ offered invaluable criticism and bibliographical suggestions. I also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia), Portugal, through the project PTDC/LLT LES/30930/2017 (national funds).

References

Accorinti, D. (1987) ‘Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, canto T (= xix)’, diss. Florence.Google Scholar
Accorinti, D. (1996) Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, canto xx, Pisa.Google Scholar
Accorinti, D. (ed.) (2016a) Brill's companion to Nonnus of Panopolis, Leiden.10.1163/9789004310698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accorinti, D. (2016b) ‘The poet from Panopolis: an obscure biography and a controversial figure’, in Accorinti (2016a) 1153.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2001) ‘L'epica biblica greca nell'età tardoantica. Autori e lettori nel iv e v secolo’, in Stella, F. (ed.), La scrittura infinita: Bibbia e poesia in età medievale e umanistica, Florence, 67104.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2002) ‘I poemetti del codice Bodmer e il loro ruolo nella storia della poesia tardoantica’, in Hurst, A. and Rudhardt, J. (eds.), Le Codex des visions, Geneva, 73114.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2003) Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, canto quinto, Florence.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2004) Nonno di Panopoli. Le Dionisiache. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Volume iii: Canti xxvxxxix, Milan.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2010) ‘Libro della poesia e poesia del libro nella tarda antichità’, CentoPagine 4, 1126.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2015a) ‘Poesia greca nella (e della?) biblioteca Bodmer’, Adamantius 21, 8697.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2015b) ‘Chanter les dieux dans la sociéte´ chre´tienne. Les Hymnes de Proclus dans le contexte culturel et religieux de leur temps’, in Belayche, N. and Pirenne-Delforge, V. (eds.), Fabriquer du divin. Constructions et ajustements de la repre´sentation des dieux dans l'Antiquité, Liège, 183212.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2016) ‘L'epillio nelle Dionisiache? Strutture dell'epica nonniana e contesto culturale’, Aitia 6, available at http://aitia.revues.org/1579?lang=en.Google Scholar
Bär, S. (2009) Quintus Smyrnaeus ‘Posthomerica’ 1. Die Wiedergeburt des Epos aus dem Geiste der Amazonomachie. Mit einem Kommentar zu den Versen 1–219, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2000) ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of genre: authors, canons and society, Cambridge, MA, 167–82.Google Scholar
Boeft, J. den and Hilhorst, A. (eds.) (1993) Early Christian poetry: a collection of essays, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1995) ‘Ancient anagrams’, AJPh 116, 477–84.Google Scholar
Castelli, E. (2017) ‘Il titolo taciuto. Sull'epigramma ix, 198 dell’Anthologia Palatina e la trasmissione dei Dionysiaca di Nonno di Panopoli’, ByzZ 110, 631–44.Google Scholar
Consolino, F. E. (2005) ‘Il senso del passato: generi letterari e rapporti con la tradizione nella “parafrasi biblica” latina’, in Gualandri, I., Conca, F. and Passarella, R. (eds.), Nuovo e antico nella cultura greco-latina di iv–vi secolo, Bologna, 447526.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1984) Virgilio. Il genere e i suoi confini, Milan.Google Scholar
Coşkun, A. (2003) ‘Die Programmgedichte des Prudentius: praefatio und epilogus’, JAC 7, 212–36.Google Scholar
Costanza, S. (2017) ‘Le catalogue des apôtres à la pêche miraculeuse: Nonn., par. Jo., 21, Ev. Petr. 14, 60’, in Bernard-Valette, C., Delmulle, J. and Gerzaguet, C. (eds.), Nihil veritas erubescit. Mélanges offerts à Paul Mattei par ses élèves, collègues et amis, Turnhout, 511–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. (1994) John, the son of Zebedee: the life of a legend, Columbia.Google Scholar
De Stefani, C. (2002) Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, canto i, Bologna.Google Scholar
De Stefani, C. (2016) ‘Brief notes on the manuscript tradition of Nonnus’ works’, in Accorinti (2016a) 671–90.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. (1993) ‘The attitude towards Greek poetry in the verse of Gregory Nazianzen’, in Boeft and Hilhorst (1993) 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisen, U. (2013) ‘Metalepsis in the Gospel of John – narration situation and “Beloved Disciple” in new perspective’, in Eisen, U. and von Möllendorff, P. (eds.), Über die Grenze: Metalepse in Text- und Bildmedien des Altertums, Berlin, 318–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. (2009) ‘Beyond compare: pagan Saint and Christian God in late antiquity’, Critical Inquiry 35, 655–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassina, A. and Lucarini, C. M. (2015) Faltonia Betitia Proba. Cento Vergilianus, Berlin.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2014) ‘The Metaphrasis Psalmorum, Nonnus and the theory of translation’, in Spanoudakis, K. (ed.), Nonnus of Panopolis in context: poetry and cultural milieu in late antiquity, Berlin, 195210.Google Scholar
Fauth, W. (1981) Eidos poikilon: zur Thematik der Metamorphose und zum Prinzip der Wandlung aus dem Gegensatz in den Dionysiaka des Nonnos von Panopolis, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (1985) ‘The seal of Theognis: the politics of authorship in archaic Greece’ in Figueira, T. and Nagy, G. (eds.), Theognis of Megara: poetry and the polis, Baltimore, 8295.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2017) ‘Tarda antichità anacronica: tra storiografia e panegirico’, in Mussini, C. and Rocchi, S. (eds.), Imagines antiquitatis: representations, concepts, receptions of the past in Roman antiquity and the early Italian Renaissance, Berlin, 6586.Google Scholar
Franchi, R. (2016) ‘Approaching the “Spiritual Gospel”: Nonnus as interpreter of John’, in Accorinti (2016a) 240–66.10.1163/9789004310698_013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisz, C. (2018) A study of the narrator in Nonnus of Panopolis’ Dionysiaca: storytelling in late antique epic, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geue, T. (2017) Juvenal and the poetics of anonymity, Cambridge.10.1017/9781108236348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigli Piccardi, D. (1985) Metafora e poetica in Nonno di Panopoli, Florence.Google Scholar
Gigli Piccardi, D. (1993) ‘Nonno, Proteo e l'isola di Faro’, Prometheus 19, 230–4.Google Scholar
Gigli Piccardi, D. (1998) ‘Nonno e l'Egitto’, Prometheus 24, 61–82, 161–81.Google Scholar
Greco, C. (2004) Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, canto xiii, Alessandria.Google Scholar
Green, R. (2006) Latin epics of the New Testament: Juvencus, Sedulius, Arator, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greensmith, E. (2018) ‘When Homer quotes Callimachus: allusive poetics in the proem of the Posthomerica’, CQ 68, 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. (2017) ‘Homer is a dancer (Ὅμηρος ὀρχεῖται): the poet in Choricius’, in Amato, E., Corcella, A. and Lauritzen, D. (eds.), L’école de Gaza: espace littéraire et identité culturelle dans l'Antiquité tardive, Leuven, 151–62.Google Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. (2018) ‘ποικιλόνωτος ἀνήρ: clothing metaphors and Nonnus’ ambiguous Christology in the Paraphrase of the Gospel according to John’, VChr 72, 165–83.Google Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. (forthcoming) ‘Nonnus’ Paraphrase of the Gospel according to John as didactic epic’, in Hadjittofi, F. and Lefteratou, A. (eds.), The genres of late antique Christian poetry: between modulations and transpositions, Berlin.Google Scholar
Harkins, A. K. (2011) ‘The performative reading of the hodayot: the arousal of emotions and the exegetical generation of texts’, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 21, 5571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilhorst, A. (1993) ‘The cleansing of the Temple (John 2,13–25) in Juvencus and Nonnus’, in Boeft and Hilhorst (1993) 6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hose, M. (2004) Poesie aus der Schule: Überlegungen zur spätgriechischen Dichtung, Munich.Google Scholar
Jansen, L. (2014) ‘Introduction: approaches to Roman paratextuality’, in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman paratext: frame, texts, readers, Cambridge, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, H. (2017) ‘Das Ende des mythologischen Epos in der Spätantike’, in Schmitz, C., Jöne, A. and Kortmann, J. (eds.), Anfänge und Enden: narrative Potentiale des antiken und nachantiken Epos, Heidelberg, 293312.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2009) ‘The active reader and the ancient novel’, in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S. and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and writers in the ancient novel, Groningen, 117.Google Scholar
Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2016) Die Alethia des Claudius Marius Victorius: Bibeldichtung zwischen Epos und Lehrgedicht, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2017) ‘“Involved narrating” in Eudocia's Homeric Centos’, Medievalia et Humanistica 43, 6579.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K. (1918) ‘De Nonno Evangelii Johannei interprete’, Mnemosyne 46, 225–70.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, J. and Aujoulat, N. (2004) Synésios de Cyrène. Volume iv: Opuscules i, Paris.Google Scholar
Lefteratou, A. (2016) ‘Jesus’ late antique epiphanies: Healing the Blind in the Christian epics of Eudocia and Nonnus’, in Clauss, J., Cuypers, M. and Kahane, A. (eds.), The gods of Greek hexameter poetry: from the archaic age to late antiquity and beyond, Stuttgart, 268–87.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L. (2007) ‘The Mandatum, the body, and love in Nonnus’ Paraphrase 13’, Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 59, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciver, C. (2012) Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: engaging Homer in late antiquity, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, M. (1989) The poetics of transformation: Prudentius and classical mythology, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (2012) ‘Double, double: two African Medeas’, Ramus 41, 161–89.10.1017/S0048671X00000308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcellus, Comte de (1861) Paraphrase de l'E´vangile selon Saint Jean, Paris.Google Scholar
Markus, R. (1990) The end of ancient Christianity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. (2017) ‘The Early Christian response to Platonist poetics: Boethius, Prudentius, and the Poeta Theologus’, in Elsner, J. and Lobato, J. Hernández (eds.), The poetics of late Latin literature, Oxford, 391423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrine, P. (2017) Biblical epics in late antiquity and Anglo-Saxon England: divina in laude voluntas, Toronto.10.3138/9781487514280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuckin, J. (2006) ‘Gregory: the rhetorician as poet’, in Børtnes, J. and Hägg, T. (eds.), Gregory of Nazianzus: images and reflections, Copenhagen, 191212.Google Scholar
Milovanovic-Barham, C. (1997) ‘Gregory of Nazianzus: Ars poetica (In suos versus, carm. 2.1.39)’, JECS 5, 497510.Google Scholar
Moss, C. (2010) The other Christs: imitating Jesus in ancient Christian ideologies of martyrdom, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The best of the Achaeans: concepts of the hero in archaic Greek poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nodes, D. (1993) Doctrine and exegesis in biblical Latin poetry, Leeds.Google Scholar
O'Daly, G. (2016) ‘Prudentius: the self-definition of a Christian poet’, in McGill, S. and Pucci, J. (eds.), Classics renewed: Reception and innovation in the Latin poetry of late antiquity, Heidelberg, 221–39.Google Scholar
Palmer, A.-M. (1989) Prudentius on the martyrs, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. (1967) ‘From Statius to Ennodius: a brief history of prose prefaces to poems’, RIL 101, 535–67.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2014) ‘“Sealing” the book: the sphragis as paratext’, in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman paratext: frame, texts, readers, Cambridge, 224–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The space that remains: reading Latin poetry in late antiquity, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Pollmann, K. (2001) ‘The transformation of the epic genre in Christian late antiquity’, Studia Patristica 36, 6175.Google Scholar
Pollmann, K. (2013) ‘Establishing authority in Christian poetry of Latin late antiquity’, Hermes 141, 309–30.Google Scholar
Pollmann, K. (2017) The baptized Muse: early Christian poetry as cultural authority, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, L. (1995) ‘The seal of Theognis, writing, and oral poetry’, AJPh 116, 171–84.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2015) ‘Late antique metaphors for the shaping of Christian identity: coins, seals and contracts’, in Amstutz, H. et al. (eds.), Fuzzy boundaries: Festschrift für Antonio Loprieno, ii, Hamburg, 727–44.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1985) Biblical epic and rhetorical paraphrase in late antiquity, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (2017) ‘Lactantius’ Phoenix and late Latin poetics’, in Elsner, J. and Lobato, J. Hernández (eds.), The poetics of late Latin literature, Oxford, 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. (2006) ‘Ancient literary genres – a mirage?’, in Laird, A. (ed.), Ancient literary criticism, Oxford, 421–39.Google Scholar
Scheindler, A. (1881) Nonni Panopolitani Paraphrasis S. Evangelii Joannei, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schembra, R. (2007) Homerocentones, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2005) ‘Nonnos und seine Tradition’, in Alkier, S. and Hays, R. B. (eds.), Die Bibel im Dialog der Schriften: Konzepte intertextueller Bibellektüre, Tübingen, 195216.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, R. (1975) Das Johannesevangelium, iii Teil: Kommentar zu Kap. 13 21, Freiburg.Google Scholar
Schottenius Cullhed, S. (2015) Proba the prophet: the Christian Virgilian Cento of Faltonia Betitia Proba, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) ‘The idea of Godlikeness’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: ethics, politics, religion, and the soul, Oxford Readings in Philosophy, Oxford, 309–28.Google Scholar
Sherry, L. (1996) ‘The Paraphrase of St. John attributed to Nonnus’, Byzantion 66, 409–30.Google Scholar
Shorrock, R. (2011) The myth of paganism: Nonnus, Dionysus and the world of late antiquity, London.Google Scholar
Sieber, F. (2016) ‘Nonnus’ Christology’, in Accorinti (2016a) 308–26.10.1163/9789004310698_016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simelidis, C. (2009) Selected poems of Gregory of Nazianzus: i.2.17; ii.1.10, 19, 32, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2014) Nonnus of Panopolis: Paraphrasis of the Gospel of John XI, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2016) ‘Pagan themes in the Paraphrase’, in Accorinti (2016a) 601–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, C. (1988) The Gospel as epic in late antiquity: the Paschale carmen of Sedulius, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, J. (2003) ‘Origen and Cyril of Alexandria: continuities and discontinuities in their approach to the Gospel of John’, in Perrone, L. (ed.), Origeniana octava: Origen and the Alexandrian tradition, Leuven, 955–65.Google Scholar
Tsuchihashi, S. (2015) ‘The likeness to God and the imitation of Christ: the transformation of the Platonic tradition in Gregory of Nyssa’, in Dunn, G. D. and Mayer, W. (eds.), Christians shaping identity from the Roman Empire to Byzantium: studies inspired by Pauline Allen, Leiden, 100–16.Google Scholar
Urbano, A. P. (2018) ‘Literary and visual images of teachers in late antiquity’, in Gemeinhardt, P., Lorgoux, O. and Munkholt Christensen, M. (eds.), Teachers in late antique Christianity, Tübingen, 131.Google Scholar
Waetjen, H. C. (2005) The Gospel of the Beloved Disciple: a work in two editions, New York.Google Scholar
Waltz, P. (1960) Anthologie grecque. Anthologie Palatine. Volume i: Livres iiv, Paris.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. (2016) ‘Nonnus and biblical epic’, in Accorinti (2016a) 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, M. (2018) ‘Christodorus of Coptus on the statues in the baths of Zeuxippus at Constantinople: text and context’, in Bannert, H. and Kröll, N. (eds.), Nonnus of Panopolis in context ii: poetry, religion, and society, Leiden, 271–88.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2013a) ‘An I for an I: reading fictional autobiography’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.), The author's voice in classical and late antiquity, Oxford, 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2013b) ‘Radical cognition: metalepsis in classical Greek drama’, G&R 60, 416.Google Scholar
Zuenelli, S. (2016) ‘Die Perioche der Dionysiaka als Mittel der Selbstinszenierung’, Mnemosyne 69, 572–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

THE POET AND THE EVANGELIST IN NONNUS’ PARAPHRASE OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

THE POET AND THE EVANGELIST IN NONNUS’ PARAPHRASE OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

THE POET AND THE EVANGELIST IN NONNUS’ PARAPHRASE OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *